Sex and the City writer regrets putting career over family

You’ll be seeing a lot more of this with this generation.

Her best-selling book and the racy TV series it inspired taught a generation of women that they could ‘have it all’.

But Sex and the City creator Candace Bushnell, 60, has admitted that she regrets choosing a career over having children as she is now ‘truly alone’.

The TV series starred Sarah Jessica Parker as a writer in New York who famously chooses her independence over motherhood.

Miss Bushnell, pictured, divorced her husband – ballet dancer Charles Askegard – in 2012 and said it made her realise the importance of starting a family.

The former sex columnist, who is worth around £18million, told the Sunday Times: ‘When I was in my thirties and forties, I didn’t think about it.

‘Then when I got divorced and I was in my fifties, I started to see the impact of not having children and of truly being alone. I do see that people with children have an anchor in a way that people who have no kids don’t.’

The article neglects to mention if this woman has any regret whatsoever about glamorizing a vapid and ultimately empty lifestyle to an entire generation of women.  Culture is upstream from politics.  Who knows how many women were affected subconsciously to live the single, NYC, YOLO life because of this show.  We can say with a certainty though that the ones who decided to not have children because of it will most certainly regret it when they get older too.  It is less certain how many will realize it was because of the people they chose to follow and the choices they made.  No doubt some will just blame men.  The evil one tempts with material, temporary pleasure in the moment.  The more people pull away from God and traditional Western values the worse society will become.

Do you know what your children are being taught in school?

I’m sure many of the parents who had to sign a permission slip for their child to go on this field trip (are permission slips still a thing?) thought that going to a museum to see an art exhibit would be harmless enough.  And herein lies the problem.  Many parents today assume that school today is mostly like what they were doing and seeing when they were in school a generation ago.  It is not.

Whale.png

I’m sure most of them didn’t expect their children to be subjected to a obsese woman blatantly flashing their children.  Seriously, how is this not indecent exposure?  Exposing yourself to children?  This is not art.  To call it art and to force children to look at this and accept it as art is a travesty as it is.  Couple that with the fact that IT IS A GROWN WOMAN EXPOSING HERSELF TO CHILDREN and it is wildly unacceptable.

Our society is broken.  Our children are being indoctrinated to think like they want them to think.  Worse, our children are being shown “art” that is utterly hideous.  Kids that grow up not recognizing or experiencing the good, the beautiful, and the true will be completely unable to recognize beauty if they’ve never experienced it.  How can you ever pull yourself out of that or of living in perpetual sin if you’ve never experienced or known anything else?

Former IKEA Employee Sues for being fired after posting Bible Quotes

More Christians need to start standing up for their beliefs, rather than remain silent while their culture and religion are attacked, undermined, and marginalized.  Via Christianpost.com:

The popular Sweden-based furniture retailer IKEA is being sued after it fired an employee in Poland for posting Bible verses to voice his objection to the company’s promotion of “LGBT rights.”

The former employee, identified only as Tomasz K., told state broadcaster TVP Info that he was let go from the store in Krakow after he declined to delete a comment he posted on the company’s intranet.

The comment in question was critical of an event the company hosted in May to show solidarity with the LGBT community.

“I was shaken up, I’ve been hired to sell furniture but I’m a Catholic and these aren’t my values,” Tomasz explained.

In a statement, the company said it published an article on May 16, the international day against homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, presenting IKEA’s “values and position” on the LGBT issues.

The statement added that the employee published a comment under the article voicing “his opinion in a way that could affect the rights and dignity of LGBT + persons.”

According to the Catholic News Agency, Tomasz posted two verses from Scripture in his objection to the company promoting homosexuality.

One verse was Matthew 18:6, which reads: “Woe to him through whom scandals come, it would be better for him to tie a millstone around his neck and plunge him in the depths of the sea.”

The other verse, Leviticus 20:13, reads: “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.”

Good on Tomasz, and good on Poland:

In addition to the lawsuit, Poland Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro ordered investigators to look into Tomasz’s case.

On Friday, Ziobro called the situation a “shocking matter.”

“It is absolutely scandalous if it was confirmed,” Ziobro added, according to TVP Info.

Poland, which is about 87 percent Catholic, is run by the conservative Law and Justice Party. Law and Justice Party leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski warned last month that the advancement of gay rights is a “grave danger” for families, according to Bloomberg.

This is not the first time that IKEA has drawn the ire of Polish Catholics.

In 2008, some Polish Catholics boycotted IKEA after the home-goods chain featured a gay couple in its catalog.

Proud Christian nations like Poland will end up okay.  It really shows how far the United States has fallen.  Once a Christian country, likely a majority of the country would go apeshit if the US government openly called for investigation of this sort or insinuate that the advancement of gay rights is a “grave danger” for families (which it obviously is).  One has to wonder if IKEA would deal with a Muslim quoting the Koran in the same way they reprimanded a Christian for quoting the Bible.  I forget where Islamophobia falls, is it above or below LGBTQ on the social justice pyramid?

A few interesting tidbits on the American music industry

It is interesting to see how a massive industry like the music industry in America can be molded and shaped with specific ideas and a specific endpoint in mind that is completely under the surface and invisible to anyone who purports to be a fan of it.  When you pull back the curtain, and see the aims that go into songwriting and how they try and shape the mind and culture, it is disturbing.

I am nearly complete E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit And Its Impact on World History.  It is long, over 1000 pages, but it is a very interesting read.  One section in particular touches revolution in music and how it opened the door to the sexual liberation movement, civil rights, and even had ties to Communism.  Given the length of some of the quotes below I will keep this portion short, but the basic premise is that there is a lot of evidence that prominent Jews, who were disproportionately represented in Bolshevism and kept it going, commandeered folk music in America to their own ends.

Alan Lomax implemented the changed party line by discovering the leading lights of the first generation of folk singers, Josh White, Burl Ives, Woody Gurthrie, Pete Seeger, and Leadbelly, fostering their careers by guiding them through the political eddies of Washington and New York society, “teaching them songs, socializing with them and serving as their intellectual guide” and ensuring their “unflagging commitment to left-wing ideology.”  Lomax was the ideal promoter, content to work behind the scenes.  By the 1940s, “the urban folk singers he had encouraged and who shared his worldview were ready to make a substantial imprint on American musical life, on the left-wing cultural scene, as well as on the national stage.”  It is not an exaggeration to say that Alan Lomax created American folk music as we know it today.  He certainly created it as it was known from 1940, when the radical choruses waned, until 1956, when the Lomax group of folksingers fell apart because of disillusionment with Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin and suppression of the Hungarian revolt.

Wealthy Jews did the same to African-Americans with jazz and you still see it to this day in the rap industry.  Who becomes big, and why, have nothing to do with actual talent.  Sure, some have some talent, but the messages in the songs and the pacts these artists make to ensure fame are much darker and more sinister than anyone thinks.  Think, selling your soul to the devil level sinister.  That is a topic for another time but a nice little snippet in the video below if you’re interested in going down that rabbit hole.

With the underpinning of folk music essentially controlled and run by prominent Communist Jews, it makes the Bob Dylan connection more interesting.  This essay by Miles Mathis is fantastic and goes into great detail on Bob Dylan and bridges the E. Michael Jones chapter with the Miles Mathis section below connecting Woody Guthrie and Bob Dylan.  He is not the man you thought he was.  His image was completely fabricated from the ground up.  He was not some regular old country boy from Minnesota that organically blew up.  Bob Dylan was born Robert Zimmerman to a prominent Jewish family in Minnesota with ties to the Rockefellers and Rothschilds.  Nothing about his rise was organic.  It was all orchestrated.  The devil is in the details.  Is it that surprising he uses popular culture in forms like music to influence?

We see more red flags early on, when in 1961, at age 20, Dylan scored a review in the New York Times.  As with Ezra Pound’s meteoric rise in London in 1908, Dylan’s meteoric rise in New York in 1961simply isn’t believable. He had been playing in Greenwich Village for only about six months, had no original material, hadn’t written any of his great early songs yet, and somehow the New York Times does a review of him? He was the opening act for the Greenbriar Boys at Gerde’s Folk City.  There probably weren’t ten people in the audience. So let’s ask the question begged. Who wrote the review?  Robert Shelton, who was really Robert Shapiro, from another family of wealthy Jews. Who was booking Gerde’s at the time? Charlie Rothschild. Does that name ring a bell? Do you think he might be Jewish also? Wealthy family? Also remember who is behind the New York Times. The Sulzberger family, extremely wealthy Jews who also founded the New York Stock Exchange. Even before the New York Times and all other media were taken over by the CIA in the 1950’s, that paper had been controlled by extremely vested interests, to say the least.  So clearly, someone had a plan for Dylan. Or, we should say, he was the front man for some operation.  We will call it Operation Rolling Stone.

We know Intelligence was running all sorts of secret operations in the 1960’s. Many of them have since been partially de-classified, like Operation Mockingbird, Operation Bluebird, Operation Chaos, MKULTRA, and many many more. But there appears to have been an even larger, more fundamental Operation beneath all of them. This was Operation Rolling Stone.  It was the promotion of change in all forms. To what end? The promotion of trade. The Jews and Gentiles that would run the 20th century were masters of trade. They were money lenders and money changers and money makers. These families had always been very good at making money, but in the 20th century they discovered a way to accelerate this money making beyond even their own dreams. They discovered that accelerated trade depended directly on accelerated change. The more change of any kind they could introduce into society, the more money they would make. This is simply because change can always be accompanied with new products. New products = new wealth. More products = more wealth. Therefore, the fundamental and underlying Operation of the 20th century has been CHANGE.

This was revolutionary in every way, since humans don’t really like change. Like cats and all other animals, they prefer things to stay as they are. Living creatures tend to equate change with discomfort.  So to promote change was to go against human nature. It wasn’t something that would happen on its own. It had to be manufactured and constantly sold.

It was revolutionary in another way, since it went against all tradition. Tradition had always taught that change was something to be avoided. All the major religions sought balance and harmony, neither of which could be maintained in times of rapid change.

And a little further down:

Robert Heinlein cryptically suggested the same thing as far back as 1952, in his story The Rolling Stones. It is about a family in search of adventure and money.

So the Rolling Stone meme was a creation of Intelligence. It was likely the title of their biggest and longest running Operation. In this way, it linked Dylan, the Rolling Stones, and the magazine. All were fronts for British/US intelligence. Their prime directive was the creation of rapid change.  Do you think it is a coincidence that one of Dylan’s most famous songs is “The times, they are a’changin”? Yes, they were and are, but who was changin’ them and why? Let’s look more closely at the lyrics.

Come writers and critics

Who prophesy with your pen

And keep your eyes wide

The chance won’t come again
And don’t speak too soon
For the wheel’s still in spin
And there’s no tellin’ who
That it’s namin’
Curious. Dylan is telling writers and critics not to speak too soon. In other words, to keep quiet. To go with it. This is curious because a lot of the change going on in the 1960’s wasn’t for the better.  These people conspicuously tied themselves to the civil rights movement—which was the positive change happening at the time; but far bigger things were going on which we now can see were negative: the rise of Intelligence, the rise of the corporate media, the rise of the police state, the continued rise of the war economy, and the permanent entrenchment of a secret government. And, we can now add to that the permanent acceleration of society, which would create both huge sums of new wealth and the complete dissolution of culture. Also curious are the lines “And there’s no tellin’ who that it’s namin’”. The songwriter is giving us a bit of a clue there, telling us there are unnamed people behind the spinning wheel. With very little digging, we have seen those names come up already: Rockefeller, Rothschild, Sulzberger, etc.
This is also curious:
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don’t stand in the doorway
Don’t block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
Senators are being told that they will get hurt if they stand in the way of this change. That’s not really a progressive sentiment in a Republic or Democracy, is it? Congressmen are supposed to be representatives of the people, and these representatives are being threatened here. Why does anyone think this song is progressive?
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin’
Please get out of the new one
If you can’t lend your hand
This is no better. It is fascism posing as progressive politics. If your sons and daughters are no longer your charges, who are they the charges of? That’s right, the State. The financiers want control of your kids, because they can then sell them things more easily and directly. That is precisely what has happened. Kids are now raised by the corporate media, to the benefit of no one but the billionaires and trillionaires.
The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The curse it is cast? What does that mean? How could positive change be a curse? If Dylan is just talking about civil rights here, as is the common interpretation, how is any curse being cast? Ask yourself that.

The order is

Rapidly fadin’

And the first one now

Will later be last

The old order is rapidly fading. What was the old order? The aristocracy. In the 20th century, we have seen the aristocracy replaced by the financiers as the controllers of society. The Jews, who were formerly last, will be first, and the aristocrats will now be last. The old houses will be pulled down and replaced by new mansions. These lines are usually read as Biblical references, as in the meek will inherit the Earth. But that hasn’t happened, has it? No, because that was never the plan. That isn’t what these lyrics mean. No one ever gave a damn about the meek. The same can be said of Lennon’s song Imagine, which is commonly misread as progressive. It is beautifully arranged and performed, which makes it so seductive, but it isn’t progressive at all.

Imagine there’s no heaven

It’s easy if you try

No hell below us

Above us only sky

Imagine all the people

Living for today…

Sounds great on a cursory reading, but if you read it in context of recent history, it becomes far more sinister. As I show in my paper on Theosophy, the financiers have been trying to destroy all religions in order to co-opt their tithe. If the religions are gone, you have no one to go to but your government. The government becomes your priest and confessor, your father, brother, sister and mother, and all your alms go to it.

Imagine there’s no countries

It isn’t hard to do

Nothing to kill or die for

And no religion too

Imagine all the people

Living life in peace…

No countries. Does New World Order mean anything to you? Without countries, there are no laws except the laws the financiers impose on you. For them, anything goes. That is precisely what we have seen in the past 50 years, and especially since the 1990’s, when NAFTA and GATT gutted all local laws in favor of corporate rapine.

Imagine no possessions

I wonder if you can

I can. After they take all your possessions, you are left with none. That’s what we’ve seen in the past decades, as the superrich have sucked the middle and lower classes dry with various grand thefts like LIBOR, quantitative easing, corporate bailouts, and a raft of others. And you don’t even possess your privacy anymore, since they are spying on you all the time, with satellites, appliances, street cameras, web snooping, illegal phone tapping, open emails, and so on.

What’s the point of all this?  It is to show how the evil one uses art, music, culture, pleasing sounds, to influence your thoughts and actions.  This isn’t an attack on the Jews as a people.  You can make a good case that they are more susceptible because they lack Logos in having denied Jesus Christ.  But they aren’t the ultimate enemy as so many fools will spew over and over again.  No.  The enemy is Satan.  He uses willing individuals, often times Jews, but definitely not exclusively, to attain his ends.  What does the example above in using the American music industry do?  It enacts revolution and change.  The call to break up nations, one world government.  As mentioned above, change is a huge moneymaker.  Whether that comes in the form of capitalism or communism what does it do?  As with all of the evil one’s deceptions, the entire point is TO PULL YOU AWAY FROM JESUS CHRIST.  Whether that is in the form of people worshipping money, or focused on revolution, or whatever else, the entire point is to pull you away from the Good, the Beautiful, and the True.

Hopefully the above snippets, even if you are not to the point yet where you realize it all boils down to good vs evil, it will get you wondering and thinking why and how so many things we assumed were true were really manufactured or made to look organic but in fact had underpinnings in government intelligence operations or wealthy financiers.  Start there.  Or the moon landing.  Or any of the other topics we’ll broach over the next few months.  Eventually, if you are honest with yourself, you will see there is a greater evil at work, and once you can get there, you will see that there is only one way to combat that evil.

A Heartfelt Thanks to Fathers

In an age where men are under subversive attack more than ever it is important for us to take some time out of our day to thank our fathers, grandfathers, uncles, the men who raised us and who built this country.  Children need strong role models, both a mother and a father.  The idea of a strong independent woman who can do both simply is not the case.  Children need both parents.  The one common thread amongst most of the mass shooters is that they came from single-parent households and did not have a father figure.

The attack on men and fatherhood is real.  I think we can all agree in the past year or two more than ever the push to try and remove the genders is as bad as ever.  As divorce rates climb and children are increasingly raised without a father figure the ripple effect in the next generation or two will be disastrous.  And the attacks are everywhere.  Even subtle crap, like Google not thanking fathers today, is a subversive cultural attack that does have an effect.  They will find any and every excuse to celebrate every accomplishment and holiday for every group other than straight (usually white) men.  Often times it is not noticeable in the moment, but it grows over time.

GoogleFathersDay

Can’t even do it today can ya Google?

Hug your pops if you can.  Say a quick prayer if he has passed on.  Get married.  Have children.  Raise families and raise your kids right so we can leave society (hopefully) a little better off than we found it.  For those fathers out there looking for a good blog for Christian men, check out Men of the West.

Vatican pushes back on gender theory

It’s nice to see the Vatican pushing back at least a little bit on at least one topic.  On June 12th, in the middle of Pride month, they released “MALE AND FEMALE HE CREATED THEM” which is to serve as an aid to Catholic school teachers on how to deal with the topic of gender theory.  National Catholic Reporter did a nice writeup on the document:

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican office responsible for overseeing Catholic educational institutions around the world has blasted modern gender theory, claiming in a new document that it seeks to “annihilate the concept of ‘nature.’ ”

In an instruction released June 10 as LGBT people globally are celebrating pride month, the Congregation for Catholic Education calls the idea of people’s gender identities existing along a spectrum “nothing more than a confused concept of freedom in the realm of feelings and wants.”

Labeling the biological differences between men and women “constitutive of human identity,” the office also questions the intentions of those who identify as intersex and transgender.

“Efforts to go beyond the constitutive male-female sexual difference, such as the ideas of ‘intersex’ or ‘transgender,’ lead to a masculinity or femininity that is ambiguous,” states the document.

“This oscillation between male and female becomes, at the end of the day, only a ‘provocative’ display against so-called ‘traditional frameworks,’ ” it continues.

The document, which carries the title “Male and female he created them,” was released by the Vatican June 10 without prior announcement. Described as an aid for Catholic schoolteachers and parents, it is signed by the educational congregation’s leaders: Italians Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi and Archbishop Angelo Zani.

The educational aid does not carry Pope Francis’ signature, and the text makes no reference of the pontiff reviewing the document.

Groups that minister to LGBT Catholics immediately criticized the document. New Ways Ministry, one such group, called it a “harmful tool that will be used to oppress and harm not only transgender people, but lesbian, gay, [and] bisexual people, too.”

And further down:

The new document, which is 31 pages in length, does not speak of accompanying transgender people. It instead issues fierce warnings and criticisms of how children and young people are being educated today.

The text opens by saying that society is facing “an educational crisis, especially in the field of affectivity and sexuality.”

It then claims that cultural “disorientation” has destabilized the family as an institution, “bringing with it a tendency to cancel out the differences between men and women, presenting them instead as merely the product of historical and cultural conditioning.”

The heart of the document critiques modern society’s detachment of an individual’s concept of gender from their biological sex.

“Gender theory … speaks of a gradual process of denaturalization, that is a move away from nature and towards an absolute option for the decision of the feelings of the human subject,” it states.

“In this understanding of things, the view of both sexuality identity and the family become subject to the same ‘liquidity’ and ‘fluidity’ that characterize other aspects of post-modern culture, often founded on nothing more than a confused concept of freedom in the realm of feelings and wants, or momentary desires provoked by emotional impulses and the will of the individual,” it continues.

The text claims that genetic studies have shown that male and female embryos differ “from the very moment of conception.” In cases where a child is born with ambiguous genitalia, it says “it is medical professionals who can make a therapeutic intervention.”

“In such situations, parents cannot make an arbitrary choice on the issue, let alone society,” it recommends. “Instead, medical science should act with purely therapeutic ends, and intervene in the least invasive fashion, on the basis of objective parameters and with a view to establishing the person’s constitutive identity.”

Retelling the Genesis story of God creating humans in his image as men and women, the document calls for a reaffirming of “the metaphysical roots of sexual difference.”

Of course Pope Francis didn’t sign the document.  The document makes too much sense so why would he?

It is nice to see the biggest Christian institution push back on this.  Setting aside Catholic/non-Catholic differences, all Christians need to unite.  We are at a dangerous time in society and infighting is not going to help at all.  Western Civilization is under attack, and Christendom, being the main pillar of the West, must band together to try and take back what is ours.  We as Christians also need to be more vocal about uncomfortable topics like gender theory and transgenderism.  Staying silent to some shows complicity and approval.  It allows these ideas to slowly creep in; subtly at first but eventually growing in confidence and strength as they gain more ground.  Stand firm in what you believe.  Be vocal.  It is not an act of love to watch someone do something harmful to themselves and encourage it.  Just like it is not an act of love to encourage an alcoholic to continue drinking, it is doing the individual no favors if we encourage them to mutilate his or her body as if it was something completely normal and acceptable.  Love sometimes requires telling difficult truths to those we care about.

Let this also serve as a stark warning that what you may take for granted in what our schools are teaching our children may not line up at all with what they are actually teaching.  This was a document for Catholic schools.  There are some horrendous things going on in public schools right now that many parents would be outraged if they discovered this is what their children are being taught.  Do you really want your 10 year old daughter competing in a condom race to see how quickly they can put on a condom?  Do you think it just ends there?  What do you think a school putting these events on is teaching your children about sex education?

It sounds cliche but our children really are the future.  At such a young age their minds are the most malleable, and the values and ideas that are instilled into them now serve as a foundation for how they conduct themselves and live the rest of their lives.  If we allow our educational system to plant seeds of degeneracy and teach values contrary to Western Civilization and contra Christian values they will never learn what truth and beauty are, and never gain the crucial faculties to combat the evil that they will be bombarded with every step of the way.

About Pride Month…

Doesn’t it feel like every other month is pride month?  At what point can we pump the brakes and treat these people like everyone else?  Is it possible to not have to glorify behavior which many people think is completely degenerate and corrosive to society?

CorporatePride

There’s a difference between allowing two consenting adults to do what they want to each other in privacy.  It is another thing to have it flaunted in front of you at every turn and be guilted into accepting their behavior.  Or worse, being forced to have your children indoctrinated into their perversions, whether it’s taught in schools or thrown in front of your face via parades and gigantic corporations virtue signaling how tolerant they are.

Tolerance of anything and everything is not a virtue.  It is evil.  It is how we’ve gone from letting two consenting adults do what they want to each other in the privacy of their own homes to having drag kids.  It is how we’ve gotten to the point where you can’t even bring up scientific studies that show that homosexuals are abused far more as children.  Where we can’t even point to science to even ask the question whether perhaps homosexuality is driven by trauma and the environment one lives in.  Now you are automatically vilified if you don’t immediately assume homosexuality is genetic.

It is becoming clear that because of toleration we have opened the floodgates.  It is everywhere.  Watch the above video.  He cites polls showing twice as many millennials identify as some sort of LGBTQ+ than other age groups.  At what point will people start to question whether this is because people are now comfortable to come out versus very real changes actually occurring based on a shift in psyche?  And how far are we willing to allow it to slide?  As I’ve said many times before, the next step down the ladder of degeneracy will be to try and normalize pedophilia.

84b5

It is actually possible to tolerate what two people do in private without ceding your entire society because of it.  Walk around Seattle or Portland and you still see rainbow signs with “Safe space” for LGBTQ+ nonsense.  Newsflash: they are safe everywhere in this country nowadays.  Gimme a break.  The pendulum has swung so ridiculously far in their direction that no longer is accepting them enough anymore.  If you’re not fawning constantly you are somehow a homophobic bigot.  So far has the pendulum swung that it is a huge plus if you are LGBT-whatever when applying for jobs.  It is an asset at this point.

It isn’t brave or edgy to side with LGBTQ+ like they want you to believe.  When multi-billion dollar corporations are on your side what you’re doing is none of the above.  What is brave is standing up against the tide of this degeneracy.  Only when people start to stand up and speak what they believe, rather than cower in silence, which on some level is tacitly submitting, will anything change.  More people agree with us than you’d think.  It’s the silent majority thing all over again.

Again, this isn’t a call to arms or anything like that.  Good Christians should love their enemy and their neighbor.  Look at it in a different light.  Perhaps if this really is more nurture rather than nature something can be done.  Pray for these people.  Many have gone through horrific trauma as children.  Now, if they want to change, and if people are willing to repent, good things can happen.  What won’t help is pretending like this slide into degeneracy and worse is somehow acceptable and totally normal and okay or in any way good.

A great conversation between JT and JLP

Jared Taylor and Jesse Lee Peterson had a great conversation recently on Renaissance Radio.  It seems to be one of the very few podcasts from RR not on YouTube…I can’t image why…but it can be found in its entirety here.  But a small snippet is included below.  It is refreshing to hear two Christians, one white and one African-American, have a frank discussion on difficult topics that are essentially verboten today.  I don’t necessarily agree with either one entirely on every take, but one they both agree on and that I think all of us can agree on is that government subsistence to African-Americans has done them zero favors.  They went from physical enslavement to a mental enslavement of sorts.  When self-responsibility is taken away, and you are taught that you are a victim, there is nothing you can do, and <insert group here> are the people to blame for your current lot in life, evil and derision will abound.

Jesse is not afraid to take on other “uncomfortable” topics head on like family structure, feminism, voting, and President Trump.  He attributes many of our nation’s problems to a lack of Christianity.  Take a listen of the small 4′ clip below for a taste.

Thanks, white men!

The Guardian put out this piece after the landmark decision in Alabama to ban abortion outright (other than serious threats to the woman’s health).  As if they are fighting for some grave injustice here.

Alabama’s new law mandating an almost blanket ban on abortion, the strictest in the United States, was passed by this group of exclusively white, male politicians.

The Alabama law will disproportionately affect black and poor women, because they are more likely to seek abortions, and less likely to have resources to obtain an abortion out-of-state.

Of the 27 Republicans, all white men, that dominate the 35-seat Alabama senate, 25 voted to pass the bill late on Tuesday.

This is what the Republican leadership group in the senate looks like, as presented on their caucus’s website:

<insert picture of heroic white men saving babies here>

There are only four women in the Alabama senate, who are among the eight-strong Democratic party minority in the upper chamber of the state legislature.

Two Republicans did not vote.

The legislation makes abortion a crime at any stage of pregnancy, with the only exception for a serious threat to the health of the woman.

This is how far we’ve come, where this rag of a news outlet can publish this article as if they are the heroes here by outing the white men who voted to ban abortion in Alabama.  As if you needed a diverse constituent of people to agree that killing babies is a bad thing.  Somehow I don’t think these feral leftists would have blamed Hillary Clinton, had she been elected president, to make a decision to start World War III with Russia given that all those men, fighting because of her decision, would die because of the decision of a woman.  But what do I know.

We need to stop cowering anytime the abortion question comes up in conversation.  We are not in the wrong for being pro-life.  They’re fighting to have the right to kill unborn children.  As someone reminded me recently, we are fighting against people who want to kill unborn children, who never had any say in life, but they will fight to abolish the death penalty for people who made conscious decisions to destroy other people’s lives.  Welcome to clown world.  Honk honk.  The next time you hear the “her body, her choice” argument calmly remind them that they made a choice to give their body away to somebody.  They made their choice.  Now they should act like adults and deal with the consequences.  I know, I know.  You may not be able to party all night and get blackout drunk once you have a kid.  What a Greek tragedy.

Birth rates continue to plummet in the West

They have declined across the board, save for women over 35.  The entire report from the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics can be found here.  Here’s a snippet from the results:

The provisional number of births for the United States in 2018 was 3,788,235, down 2% from 2017 and the lowest number of births in 32 years.  The general fertility rate was 59.0 per 1,000 women aged 15-44, down 2% from 2017 and another record low for the United States.  The total fertility rate declined 2% to 1,728.0 per 1,000 women in 2018, another record low for the nation.  Birth rates declined for nearly all age groups of women under 35, but rose for women in their late 30s and early 40s.  The birth rate for teenagers aged 15-19 was down 7% in 2018 to 17.4 births per 1,000 women; rates declined for both younger (aged 15-17) and older (aged 18-19) teenagers.

Screen Shot 2019-05-15 at 1.20.53 PM

While the birth rate overall dropping tells a story, what’s actually important is the birth rate by race.  Babies born in America aren’t magically a new race that is “American” so the total birth rate doesn’t really matter if a large portion of the country does not want to adhere to the standards and principles the country was founded on anyway.  Non-hispanic whites continue to lag behind, exacerbating the problem of what will soon be a majority non-white country.  But the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 won’t change the demographics of the country, right?  Not surprisingly, they don’t give the race statistics in the same way as every other statistic they cite.  Instead of telling us the birth rate by race, they simply supply the raw numbers.  This is a ploy.  Non-hispanic whites had more overall births, just over twice as many births as Hispanics, but when you consider non-Hispanic whites make up about 65% of the population and Hispanics just under 20% that tells quite a different story on who is breeding in larger numbers, by a noticeable margin.  People will continue to pretend they do not care or that this does not matter.  Just remember that when the percentages flip.  And remember where these people came from and how they ran their governments in their home countries.  This is what we have to look forward to.

Screen Shot 2019-05-15 at 1.31.37 PM.png

In an age where we are told to live for today, who cares about tomorrow, YOLO, etc, it is not surprising to see birth rates continue to drop in the West.  Christianity, which instills a mentality of planting seeds today for trees under which you will never enjoy the shade, has continued to be attacked and removed.  This, perhaps more than any other factor, has decimated birth rates too.  We have grown fat and lazy, indulge way too much in entertainment and other useless vices, and have grown complacent.  It is easy to see the mentality of “who wants the responsibility of kids” when there’s so much other entertainment and distraction out there.  Couple this with back-breaking taxes and the near impossibility of buying a house that won’t steep you in debt for 30 years and it only gets worse.  The only people who benefit from having more kids are those on welfare, further sucking the financial life out of hard-working people.

Sadly, the other factor nobody wants to talk about is the declining birth rate as women become more educated and work more.  One would hope we could have both, but clearly that is not happening.  If people were willing to have an open and honest conversation about this, perhaps something could be done about it.  Men and women age-wise might be better off taking different approaches to education and a career.  Might it not make more sense for women to marry and have kids before investing 10+ years in higher education and establishment in the workforce?  Is it even possible to wonder if this is a possibility without some people flipping out?  Just throwing it out there.

These birth rate trends cannot, and will not, last.  When the economic system finally becomes overloaded due to the combination of increased debt spending, yoking earners with ever more financial responsibility for those sucking off the government tit through welfare programs, and the demographic flip, the collapse will not be pretty.  And the longer it is put off the more it will hurt.

While this all sounds dour, there is hope.  At least for Christians.  That is one of the many beautiful things about Christianity; hope.  We are long overdue for a major correction.  It will come in the form of economic collapse and war.  Over 100 million immigrants and their descendants have come here since 1965 slowly eroding away the fabric of the country.  Eventually it will break.  Now is the time to move to a place and around people you can associate with and build strong communities.  Christians need to band together.  The inevitable loss of entertainment and “easy times” will help pave the way to higher birth rates, and honestly would it be such a bad thing to not be so globally connected and lost in our smart phones all day?  Strong, local, communities will spring up.  New nations will rise.

%d bloggers like this: