South Africa begins seizing white-owned farms

This will not end well.  And it may be the canary in the coalmine of things to come for whites everywhere.  Via Express:

SOUTH AFRICA’s government has begun seizing land from white farmers, targeting two game farms in the northern province of Limpopo after talks with the owners to buy the properties collapsed.

Johannesburg-based newspaper City Press reported owners Akkerland Boerdery wanted 200 million rand (£16.7m) for the land, but that the country’s government were willing to offer them just a tenth of that at 20 million rand (£1.67m).

A letter sent to the owners earlier this year had said: “Notice is hereby given that a terrain inspection will be held on the farms on April 5, 2018 at 10am in order to conduct an audit of the assets and a handover of the farm’s keys to the state.”

Akkerland Boerdery immediately took out an urgent injunction to prevent eviction until a court had ruled on the issue, but the Department of Rural Development and Land Affairs has refused the application.

ANC spokesman ZiZi Kodwa refused to reveal details of the farms being targeted and has attempted to calm investor fears, adding the proposed seizures were “tied to addressing the injustices of the past”.

He told City Press: “Over time I think the markets as well as investors will appreciate that what we are doing is creating policy certainty and creating the conditions for future investment.”

Tensions among South Africa’s white farming community has been escalating since the election of Cyril Ramaphosa as President earlier the year, who committed his African National Congress (ANC) to land expropriation.

Last week, ANC chairman Gwede Mantashe sparked panic among the farming community when he said: “You shouldn’t own more than 25,000 acres of land.

“Therefore if you own more it should be taken without compensation.”

It should tell you all you need to know that this story is essentially buried by the mainstream media.  Could you imagine the coverage this would be getting if it was a white man in power seizing land from blacks or some other minority?  Again, it’s the double standard which will cause the next civil war.  It’s open season on the white race.  The only race that apparently cannot defend itself and cannot be discriminated against.  This is actual, legitimate, racism.  What’s worse, there has been a huge uptick of violent crime towards white South African farmers, again never remarked upon in the mainstream media.

Stefan Molyneux’s video below gives a good starting point for those not too familiar with the problems going on in South Africa.  It appears that South Africa is on the same trajectory as Zimbabwe.  Property rights is a core tenet to any free, stable, nation.  In Zimbabwe’s case the farmland was taken from white farmers and redistributed to black Zimbabweans.  As you may imagine, without the acumen or experience with farming the land, it quickly went downhill.  Eventually machinery broke, the land yielded less crops, and hunger and economic decline quickly followed.  It should also be noted that this land was legitimately found and farmed before many of the blacks currently in South Africa were even in South Africa.  It’s not like these white farmers kicked them off the land first.

This is a legitimate humanitarian crisis and would be the type of refugee who truly needs help and should be let in.  It’s a clear cut path to follow, and much easier to vet than the mess in the Middle East.  I imagine it’s easy to prove that your land has been taken away with zero compensation.  Of course, everyone would make a stink about it being white refugees and would get bad press, disgusting as that would be.  Thankfully, and smartly, Russia has agreed to fast track 15,000 white South Africans to seek asylum.  This is a prime example of how immigration could be a benefit.  These are farmers that bring a tangible skill.  Russia has a lot of land and will benefit from these refugees, which is a rarity these days.

 

248 counties have more registered voters than eligible voters

Eric Eggers in his new book “Fraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election” says that 248 counties have more registered voters than eligible voters.  Via Breitbart:

“You have 248 counties in this country that have more registered voters than you have citizens of legal voting age … nearly three million people are registered to vote in more than one state,” Egger said. “Even Barack Obama’s … administration said that yeah, maybe 16 million election registrations are completely inaccurate. And in some states, this is as many as one-in-seven [registrations].”

Eggers said Democrats and left-wing organizations funded by globalist billionaire George Soros fight “at every turn to keep any effort to increase [voter] security,” which he said, “includes leveling the charges of racism anytime a state wants to do anything” about combatting voter fraud.

In exclusive Breitbart News interviews, Eggers said the “Democratic Party political machine is built in part on the reliance of illegal votes cast by demographics that vote reliably for Democrats.”

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that election fraud is a very big problem and the left relies on this to have any shot of maintaining power in Congress.  There are just over 3,100 counties in America, which puts this figure at approximately 8% of all counties in the country.  That’s almost 10% of the country’s counties where fraud is much more possible and likely to happen.  It only takes maybe swaying 5% of the country to change an election.

It’s clear the left does not take voter fraud seriously, and indeed relies on it.  It’s also apparent that they do not take the Russia threat actually seriously or they would be screaming from the hilltops that we need voter ID to stop the problem.  The reality is voter ID would destroy their party.  This problem of more registered voters than voters possible would be put to bed immediately with voter ID requirements and a re-registering requirement perhaps every 2 years or so to ensure nobody who is ineligible, dead, or moved from being able to vote (or have someone fraudulently vote in their place).  That should also wipe away other fuckery like having 170 116-year olds in one county.

President Trump is obviously aware of this issue and has pushed for voter reform before.  I have to think he has some kind of checks in waiting to help with any potential fraud knowing what he knows about how the Cabal operates.

New Mexico compound destroyed

The plot thickens in the New Mexico compound story.  The compound has mysteriously been destroyed and all that is left is rubble.

It really makes one wonder if something more sinister is going on.  Perhaps this was a Cabal training ground discovered by local police.  Maybe the judge was told to go lenient on them, and in the meantime any shred of evidence or proper detective work is now contaminated and this case could maybe get thrown out.  The RV that was in the ground is now no longer even there and the tunnels where the dead child was found are destroyed.  How convenient.

Nothing surprises me anymore.  It feels more likely to be a Cabal job than anything else at this point.  We know for a fact our government has committed false flag attacks before and given the current climate is likely more now than ever as the Cabal fights for its life.  The next few months are sure to be mighty interesting.

Yazidi refugee flees Germany to escape ISIS man who bought her for $100…who has also claimed refugee status in Germany

This story really gives you a warm fuzzy feeling about the vetting process for these so-called refugees.  A Yazidi refugee now living in Germany was confronted there by a man who was in ISIS and bought her for $100.  She fled to Germany to escape that nightmare.  Now, she is fleeing to IRAQ to escape this man again in Germany.  What’s even more tragic is this man cannot be prosecuted properly as he too has refugee status.

What struck me first was the fact she actually put the time in to learn German.  Imagine that.

There is no doubt a small portion of refugees pouring into Germany are truly in need. Far far far less than the number they are actually allowing in.  And we’ve been told they are vetted thoroughly before being let in.  How?  Many do not have proper paperwork.  And the countries they are fleeing from hardly ever have helpful paperwork to thoroughly vet an incoming refugee.  With that in mind it’s not shocking at all that even ISIS members are easily infiltrating refugee ranks and claiming status throughout Europe.

And it’s not a problem isolated to Europe.  Just this week in the United States an ISIS man was arrested in Sacramento.  Via Fox News:

Ameen allegedly arrived in Rawah, Iraq “with a caravan of ISIS vehicles” — after the organization gained control of the town on June 21, 2014 — and made their way to the Rawah police officer’s home, officials said. The following day, multiple group members, including Ameen, allegedly shot the officer.

“Ameen then allegedly fired his weapon at the victim while the victim was on the ground, killing him,” officials said.

The suspect is accused of being a member of ISIS and al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), as well as carrying out tasks for the groups, “including helping to plant improvised explosive devices,” according to the news release.

Following the alleged incident, Ameen relocated to Sacramento from Iraq “as a purported refugee” and did not mention his alleged ties to the terrorist organizations when seeking refugee status and a green card in the U.S., officials said.

This is further proof it is simply too hard or we are not properly equipped to vet anyone from coming into our country.  Apparently this must be said explicitly: the health and safety of our own citizens should come before the health and safety of refugees who have zero allegiance to our country.  It seems it wasn’t too hard for this man to pretend to be a refugee and seek refugee status here.  The entire immigration system should be shut down until we can prove that we can responsibly start it up again.  Or does Ameen need to set off  a few IEDs first before we wake up?

A Good Start: President Trump looks to ban welfare for immigrants

This is a good and logical first step in reforming our broken welfare system.  Via Breitbart:

President Trump’s ban on allowing welfare-dependent legal immigrants to resettle permanently in the United States would likely save American taxpayers about $1,600 a year per immigrant.

As Breitbart News reported, the Trump administration is set to roll out a plan in the next month that bars foreign nationals who need government welfare in order to live from resettling in the U.S. Such a ban on welfare importation through immigration has been eyed by the Trump White House since February.

Such a plan would be a boon for American taxpayers, who currently spend about $57.4 billion a year on paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million new, mostly low skilled legal immigrants every year. In the last decade, the U.S. has imported more than 10 million foreign nationals and is on track to import the same amount in the coming decade if legal immigration controls are not implemented.

The National Academies of Science released a report two years ago, noting that state and local American taxpayers are billed about $1,600 each year per immigrant to pay for their welfare, where immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash welfare than American citizen households.

It’s nice to see the numbers so clearly laid out.  $57.4 Billion dollars a year on immigrants, who we’ve been told are a great strength to us as a nation.  If it isn’t clear by now the key strength of immigrants to our nation is cheap labor for corporations.  Period.  Usually when I think of strengths I don’t think of people leeching off a government they never put anything into.  Nowadays you’re called a monster or a racist for even saying that.  That’s the state we are in.  That number will only increase if we continue to add the equivalent population of New York City just in foreigners every decade to our country.  The math does not add up and it will not end well.  And that of course doesn’t include those immigrants having children in that time, which they often do at a higher birthrate.

The country needs to grow up and have an adult conversation about immigration in the United States.  It would amount to suicide if we continue our current immigration policies and our current welfare program.  It will not do us OR THE IMMIGRANTS any good if we drown trying to help every single soul on the planet that is in some kind of need.  Yes, many situations are sad.  But we need to stop acting like children about this.  The right has kowtowed to the left and their feelings-based decision making for too long.  The United States can do far more positive in the world if we ourselves as a nation are in good financial shape.  I’ve posted the below video before but it really is the perfect illustration to show how fruitless letting in unchecked numbers of immigrants is.

11 yr old hacks replica election office website in 10 minutes

The website r00tz.org put on a challenge this weekend to hack a replica of the election office website.  An 11-yr old girl was able to hack it in 10 minutes.  r00tz.org is “A place where kids learn white-hat hacking to better the world”.  Gives you a nice warm fuzzy feeling inside that it can be hacked that easily, right?

The election security budget for 2018 was $380 million dollars.  It should give one pause when a little girl can hack an election website that could be in a swing state in 10 minutes.

The takeaway message is clear.  Ensuring a high level of election security is very hard.  Electronic voting, while no doubt easier to tally votes, is also several levels of magnitude harder to defend against cyber threats, both from without and within.  As if a Soros voting machine gave one a warm fuzzy feeling to begin with.

No.  Go back to paper ballots and require voter ID.  The Democrats are caught.  You can’t whinge on about MUH RUSSIA on the one hand and cry that voter ID is racist because reasons on the other and expect us to allow these contradicting views to continue.  Use it against them.  If Russia truly is as dangerous in election meddling as you’ve been crying about for over two years now, then buckle down and eliminate that chance with paper ballots and voter ID.  That’s it.

The mid-term elections are right around the corner and there will inevitably be some foul play afoot.  Consider even now the special election in Ohio last week.  This article from Breitbart goes into detail how Soros has tried to obstruct attempts of improving election security.  Sorry, but I have a hard time believing there are 170 registered voters in just ONE Ohio district over 116 YEARS OLD.  Are there even 170 116 year olds in all of America?  Something tells me those 116 year olds weren’t voting Republican.

Where’s the benefit? Welfare usage by immigrants vs native households

A couple years ago the Center for Immigration Studies published this landmark study on welfare usage by immigrant households (both legal and illegal) as compared to native households.  Here are a few of the key findings from the study:

  • The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household.
  • The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups.
  • At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households.
  • Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378.
  • The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives. Over 24 percent of immigrant households are headed by a high school dropout, compared to just 8 percent of native households. In addition, 13 percent of immigrant households have three or more children, vs. just 6 percent of native households.

Beyond this, more than half (51%) of ALL IMMIGRANT-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS use at least one federal welfare program, compared to 30% for native households.  See below for additional figures from the study.  The results are conclusive and altogether not surprising for many who read here, but this information must be passed around for everyone to see.

Remember, we’re being sold this as if we will perish without immigration.  The reality is we’ll perish if we continue immigration at its current levels.  Immigrants cost more money than they produce, plain and simple.  The average immigrant household is a net negative to the American taxpayer.  The stats above already show that we have a big enough welfare problem with native households as it is.  Further, these are not your great-great-grandparents’ immigrants.  We’re constantly told this is a nation of immigrants, which is patently false, and that we’ve always been welcoming.  The reality is the immigrants who came to Ellis Island did not have welfare benefits to welcome them when they got off the ships.  The only reward once getting off the boat was the OPPORTUNITY to work.  That was the American Dream.  Today, the American Dream is to be on the public dole once they get here.

There’s something of a trend in the graph above that is also worrying, though not altogether surprising.  Since 1965 the type of immigrant that has come here has changed drastically.  During the initial wave of immigrants in the 19th century the vast majority of them were of European descent.  The vast majority of immigrants today (both legal and illegal) hail from Central and South America.  And as the graph above shows the immigrants from Central and South America cost the average taxpayer much more than other demographic groups.  Again, how is this a benefit to America and its citizens?  These are tough discussions, and make some people uncomfortable.  But a little discomfort is far preferable than to say nothing and watch the destruction occur without doing anything for fear of offending someone.

Here are some of the conclusions of the study:

This study implies that two competing narratives about immigration are both true. Immigrants do indeed have a strong attachment to the labor force, as immigration advocates often point out. At the same time, however, immigrants consume a large amount of welfare spending, just as critics claim. The reason that both narratives are true is that the American welfare system has become increasingly focused on buttressing low-wage workers rather than supporting non-workers. Put more simply, welfare and low-wage work go together. Just as natives with low levels of education and large numbers of children are apt to consume welfare, immigrants with those same characteristics are also likely to be on welfare. A strong work ethic does not change this reality.

In order to reduce the cost of immigrant welfare use, either the welfare system or the immigration system must change. The former option is sometimes described as “building a wall around the welfare state” to prevent new immigrants from accessing it. It is easier said than done. Loopholes and exceptions have weakened previous attempts to limit immigrant access to welfare.18 More importantly, Congress has no power to prevent the U.S.-born children of immigrants from using the same welfare programs that the children of natives do. No matter how strong the “wall around the welfare state” is built, it cannot stop immigrant parents from signing up their U.S.-born children for Medicaid, SNAP, free school lunch, etc., as long as native parents can do the same.

Only a full-scale rollback of the welfare state for both immigrants and natives would prevent immigrant families from consuming welfare dollars. Whatever one thinks of that proposal, it is not a policy change likely to occur in the near future.19 In fact, importing new clients of the welfare state likely makes it even harder to roll back.20 As long as the U.S. continues to admit large numbers of low-skill immigrants (legal or illegal), then immigrant welfare consumption will remain high.

I’ve said before it is simply not feasible to continue immigration as we are currently doing it and be a welfare state.  That is suicide.  There is no other word for it.  We need to drastically cut down on legal immigration, and make it easier to deport illegal aliens.  Anchor babies can become citizens automatically.  This needs to stop.  Chain migration will break the back of the country.

Unfortunately, the national deficit is an abstract enough concept that nobody ever really takes it seriously.  Because we do not feel the effects of it on our everyday lives (noticeably anyway) it doesn’t feel like it’s a serious problem to most people.  It should.  And the word needs to be spread.  If the national deficit is too abstract a concept, remind people that a constant stream of legal immigrants and illegal aliens means more housing.  When’s the last time you thought you were getting a great deal on rent?  Or that housing prices were too low?  Or how about traffic?  It sounds silly, but they need to drive too.  When’s the last time you thought California could handle more cars on the road?  Or use the liberal’s arguments against them.  You want higher wages for workers?  Well, less low-skilled labor in the workplace will reduce the supply and invariably raise the wages for the workers that are left.  We need to start shifting the argument.  We have the high ground, we just need to use it better.