Some Sunday listening:
A kindergarten for Muslim children in Germany was shut down because it is “no longer grounded in the German constitution”.
A German kindergarten run by Muslim parents has been shut down over its alleged links to the Muslim Brotherhood and extremist ideology.
The Al-Nur kindergarten in Mainz, western Germany, will have to shut its doors by March 31 after losing its licence to operate.
The mosque which runs the kindergarten was accused of hosting extremist preachers and distributing dangerous materials.
The kindergarten’s leadership has hit back at the decision, calling it a ‘mystery’, SWRreported.
The state of Rheinland-Pfalz has now declared the Arab Nile-Rhine mosque to be ‘no longer grounded in the German constitution’ and ordered it to shut the kindergarten.
Concerns about the mosque were first raised in 2012 when Muhammad al-Arifi, a controversial preacher banned from Britain, Denmark and Switzerland, spoke at the Islamic centre.
In 2015 the mosque was accused of distributing written materials considered ‘dangerous to young people’.
Is it really so shocking that if you import the third world, they will bring their third world ideology with them and try to spread it? As has been stated far too many times to count, those coming into Western countries are not assimilating. They are not trying to assimilate. They have zero intent to assimilate. Instead, they are bringing the same ideologies (which made their countries what they are, by the way) they had from their home country to their new one.
Any time anybody tries to bully you about being racist or insensitive to <insert group of people from 3rd world here> you cannot cower anymore. By kowtowing to the SJW bullying you are directly sacrificing YOUR children’s futures in THEIR rightful homelands for foreigners who will inevitably change the country into something else entirely. It is your duty to protect your children and fight for their future as hard as you possibly can.
Joachim Paul of the AfD (Alternative for Germany) party in Germany is right to call out that the mosque that operates the school has been operating for 10 years with nary a concern from the German government at all. Do you really think that a mosque that invites an extremist speaker who is banned from countries such as the UK, Switzerland, and Denmark for extremist views is really going to teach good Western values to the children of this school? Something tells me that these kids are more likely to learn about Sharia law than learn about Hobbes or Locke. Already it has had ten years to indoctrinate kids with their Islamic ideology.
The educational system is how they infiltrate and infect. The US educational system has been infiltrated by far-left globalists for well over two generations now and you are seeing the effects today. This is how a 29-year-old moron like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can get elected and pitch absolutely retarded ideas like the Green New Deal.
Multiculturalism does not work. Islamic ideology is fundamentally incompatible with Western values. Those who seek to destroy our Western nations are targeting our children because they know they are the future and if they can indoctrinate them then it is all over.
It should never be this way, but there are a few areas of science that are untouchable for one reason or another. Questioning climate change will get you ridiculed and potentially risk your career. Other topics, like the investigation of IQ and differences across races, is subverted to the point that it is hardly studied at all anymore, and like climate change is career suicide. The theory of evolution by natural selection is another sacred cow that is all too often accepted as scientific fact. But the theory is falling apart, and more than 1,000 brave scientists are risking their careers to sign a dissent statement about it.
Earlier this month, a long kept list of Ph.D. scientists who “dissent from Darwinism” reached a milestone — it crossed the threshold of 1,000 signers.
“There are 1,043 scientists on the ‘A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism’ list. It passed the 1,000 mark this month,” said Sarah Chaffee, a program officer for the Discovery Institute, which maintains the list.
“A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism” is a simple, 32-word statement that reads: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
Launched in 2001, the list continues to collect support from scientists from universities across America and globally. Signers have earned their Ph.D.s at institutions that include Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Cornell, Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth and the University of Pennsylvania. Others on the list earned their doctorates at Clemson, UT Austin, Ohio State, UCLA, Duke, Stanford, Emory, UNC Chapel Hill and many others universities. Still other signers are currently employed as professors across the nation.
Those who sign it “must either hold a Ph.D. in a scientific field such as biology, chemistry, mathematics, engineering, computer science, or one of the other natural sciences; or they must hold an M.D. and serve as a professor of medicine,” according to the institute.
The group points out that signing the statement does not mean these scholars endorse “alternative theories such as self-organization, structuralism, or intelligent design,” but rather simply indicates “skepticism about modern Darwinian theories central claim that natural selection acting on random mutations is the driving force behind the complexity of life.”
According to Discovery Institute Senior Fellow David Klinghoffer, the signers “have all risked their careers or reputations in signing.”
The theory of evolution by natural selection, much like climate change, is one of those topics every lay person takes for granted assuming it is true because lots of scientists say that it is. And like climate change, you are roundly laughed at or worse if you even remotely question its validity.
If you are willing to keep an open mind, consider watching the three videos below. One is a debate between Vox Day and biologist Jean-Francois Gariépy. It is Vox Day essentially positing his theory to JF about why he doesn’t think TENS is a realistic possibility. What is interesting about it is he is coming at it from an economist point of view, as that is his background. In short, the math doesn’t add up.
Not exactly shocking news here.
Chicago may be known as the “Second City,” but it remains Number 1 in the ranking of most corrupt big cities in the nation, according to a new report.
The report, titled “Corruption in Chicago and Illinois,” released Monday from the University of Illinois at Chicago notes that while there’s been a decline in recent years of federal convictions for public corruption, the Windy City still leads other localities.
“Additionally, Illinois remains the third most corrupt state when compared on a per capita basis to other large states and the District of Columbia,” the report’s authors note.
The group used the most recent figures from the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, which found that there were a total of 25 public corruption convictions during 2017 in the Northern District of Illinois, which includes all of Chicago and the northern third of Illinois. That was down from 30 in 2016 and down an average of 33.6 per year over the last 10 years.
“There were a total of 34 cases of public corruption convictions in all of Illinois, proving that public corruption is not just a big city problem,” the authors noted.
Since 1976, when the DOJ began keeping track of public corruption statistics, there were 1,731 people convicted of public corruption in the Chicago area. In the same time period, there were 1,534 people in Los Angeles, 1,327 in New York, 1,165 in Miami and 1,159 in Washington D.C.
“These five districts, Chicago, Los Angeles, Manhattan, Miami and Washington D.C. led all of the 93 federal judicial districts for the 47-year period since 1976,” according to the report.
Let’s take a quick look at who has been running Chicago for the past 47 years, shall we?
Probably just a coincidence. Totally coincidental too that all of those five districts are heavily blue. I seem to remember some other guy coming out of Chicago who rose up the ranks too around 2008 or so. Probably totally clean.
Birth rates are declining in the west, and we have been told a lie that we need to import foreigners to make up for this difference. While proposing that as a solution is patently absurd and societal suicide, Hungary offers a different incentive.
Hungary’s prime minister has announced a raft of measures aimed at boosting the country’s declining birth rate and reducing immigration.
Giving his annual State of the Nation address Sunday, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced a seven-point “Family Protection Action Plan” designed to promote marriage and families.
Measures announced included waivers on personal income tax for women raising at least four children for the rest of their lives and subsidies for large families to buy larger cars. The ‘action plan’ also extended a loan program to help families with at least two children to buy homes. Every woman under 40 will also be eligible for a preferential loan when she first gets married.
The government has also said it will spend more on Hungary’s heathcare system and will create 21,000 creche places. In addition, grandparents will be eligible to receive a childcare fee if they look after young children instead of the parents, Orban said.
“There are fewer and fewer children born in Europe. For the West, the answer (to that challenge) is immigration. For every missing child there should be one coming in and then the numbers will be fine,” Orban said, Reuters reported.
“But we do not need numbers. We need Hungarian children,” he said, announcing the incentives program.
Victor Orban is a good man, concerned for the well being of his people, aka Hungarians. It is hard to say if this would work in America or not. On the one hand this should incentive whites to have more children, especially because they bear the brunt of the tax burden. There would be more of an incentive there for them than other racial groups who pay less in taxes already. On the other hand, if the idea is to increase the population of actual Americans (read: pre-1965 demographics) this may help but could potentially only exacerbate the problem if other groups take more advantage of it.
As always, people will freak out when you read something like that. The powers that be have successfully made the topic of race and demographics verboten. Toxic. But it is not toxic to want to preserve one’s own people. To defend one’s own country from enemies both within and beyond our borders. As has been stated many times before, there is no magic dirt here in the United States. You do not automatically become American, whatever American even means anymore, just because you now live in this country, and even become a citizen. Once upon a time America had a very distinct racial makeup. But the myth of the melting pot and post-1965 immigration have turned it into a fractured society. I doubt very much whether that trend can be reversed. Certainly closing the borders entirely and ending immigration altogether would be a good starting point. Again: it is not racist to want to live amongst your own people and preserve the demographic makeup this country historically was. Every other non-western country seems to have this right already. We should too.
This measure is really just symbolic, but could maybe lead to stricter regulations some day. Via azcentral:
Citing concerns about the proliferation of erotic images online and their “toxic” effect on behavior, Arizona lawmakers are pushing to declare pornography a public health crisis.
State Rep. Michelle Udall, R-Mesa, introduced a measure that declares the crisis and states porn “perpetuates a sexually toxic environment that damages all areas of our society.”
“Like the tobacco industry, the pornography industry has created a public health crisis,” Udall told lawmakers. “Pornography is used pervasively, even by minors.”
Udall’s proposal, House Concurrent Resolution 2009, is largely symbolic and has no legal effect, but supporters say they hope it opens the door to new restrictions on porn.
Similar measures declaring a crisis have passed in at least 11 states, using similar text from model legislation written by the National Center on Sexual Exploitation. The group, formerly known as Morality in Media, contends porn is directly connected to other acts of exploitation.
Issues like these are tricky. As I wrote about recently, porn is degenerate. Especially the kind of stuff the major porn websites push nowadays like incest and non-consensual sex. The issue is tricky because, much like drugs, I am not sure the government should have the right to determine what you do to yourself or watch. On the other hand, if there are serious adverse effects to society at large that may open the door to some regulations. For example, perhaps they could ban porn that pushes incest or rape because that truly is a net negative effect to society at large, much like drunk driving.
The reality is as Christianity and Christian morals continue to decline in the west, we will continue to see more and more debauchery and bad behavior. Unlike what they want you to believe, without that moral framework most people do not behave the same way. A Christian society would likely not need to enact laws like this in the first place. Perhaps some level of control is needed if we are to continue down this path straying further away from the Christian roots this country was founded on.
California governor Gavin Newsom has decided to pull nearly 400 National Guard troops from the border.
LOS ANGELES — Gov. Gavin Newsom of California announced Monday that he would withdraw nearly 400 of his state’s National Guard troops from deployment along the border with Mexico and assign them to other duties.
The step to rescind state authorization for the border deployment is a sharp rebuke of President Trump’s continued warnings that undocumented migrants present a national security risk to the United States. It follows a similar move last week by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico.
Under a “general order” that Mr. Newsom plans to sign, 110 California National Guard troops will be redirected to support the state’s central fire agency, Cal Fire, and another 100 will work on statewide “intelligence operations” aimed at international criminal drug gangs.
Mr. Newsom is also seeking to expand the state’s Counterdrug Task Force with 150 National Guard troops, which would require funding from the Department of Defense.
Since his election in November, Mr. Newsom has emphasized a progressive vision for California and the country, pitching his state as a leader on issues like immigration, climate change and income inequality. He promised last month to “offer an alternative to the corruption and incompetence in the White House.”
Mr. Newsom is expected to speak publicly about the redeployment during his State of the State address on Tuesday, with sharp criticism of the president’s immigration policies and rhetoric.
It is becoming increasingly clear that if the United States is to survive it would do a lot of good by building a wall that covers not only the southern border but that extends northwards to exclude California. This is absolute madness, and petty virtue signaling. This clown, who thinks he’s “offering an alternative to the corruption and incompetence in the White House” has some explaining to do. The United States is on pace to have the worst year of illegal immigration since 2007:
Illegal immigration across the southwest border is on pace for the worst year since 2007 — or the last time the country began a massive wall-building spree — according to new Homeland Security numbers.
Four months into the fiscal year the Border Patrol nabbed nearly 201,500 people, compared to about 109,500 at the same point in the previous year. If that 84 percent surge holds, it works out to 733,000 immigrants crossing illegally for fiscal year 2019, which would be by far the highest numbers in more than a decade.
Please then explain to me why you must pull National Guard troops away during the worst illegal immigration crisis in over a decade to fight fires when the worst of the fires was months ago?
It is not hyperbole to say that California poses an existential threat to the United States. Do you really think that these illegals just stay in California once they cross the border? Of course not. They spread throughout the country, taking jobs away from American citizens and lowering wages for everyone. California also accounts for 1/3 of all welfare recipients in the United States, despite being just 12% of the total population according to 2012 statistics. And when Californians get tired of California and leave, they bring their same destructive policies with them and vote the same exact way that ruined California in the first place.
Of course, Gavin Newsom won’t ever feel any of the negative effects of his BS virtue signaling. No. It will be average citizens who lose family members to illegal immigrants who were caught for crimes and released back onto the streets. California is fast becoming the albatross around America’s neck that will drown it. Cut it off. If you live there, get out sooner rather than later. It is sad it has to come to this. But California is fallen. Given the absolute horrific things that go on in Hollywood and what they allow into this country, it might not be worth saving anyway. Something Biblical needs to, and will, happen.
I am reading Martin van Creveld’s Equality: The Impossible Quest, which deals with the idea of equality and how it has tried to be implemented over the years. The title reveals his conclusions. This passage struck a chord given the similarities to the current situation in the United States.
Compared to the city-state in which Rome originated, and the chiefdoms in which all the rest did, empires were extremely un-egalitarian. Indeed one could argue that inequality, often buttressed by alleged divine descent or mission and enforced by mighty armed forces as well as sophisticated bureaucratic structures, was precisely the factor that tied them together. Some empires were remarkably long-lived – one need only think of ancient Egypt, China and Japan. Others, such as those of Mesopotamia, and the Middle East as well as Mexico, succeeded each other. Generally the more homogenous an empire, ethnically speaking, the longer it lasted, though nothing endures forever. The life of even the most homogeneous empires was punctuated by so-called intermediate periods during which emperors lost control both over provinces and the men who governed them. Such periods might last for decades, sometimes centuries. Supposing civil war did not lead to a total collapse, the outcome was decentralization and feudalism. Thus the line separating empire from feudalism was often a flexible one. That explains why historians have so often wondered whether the term may or may not be applied to the Arab Middle East, Persia, India, and Japan in addition to Europe.
America is more or less an empire, and it is becoming increasingly clear that whatever we like to say about everyone being equal under the law that is not the case at all. If you are part of the Cabal, perjury and treason are entirely acceptable without any consequences. There is a very clear distinction in whom the law applies to and whom it does not. I still hold out hope that President Trump will be able to drain the swamp and restore some semblance of order.
The other thing that is abundantly clear is that this experiment of diversity, throwing in way too many different groups of people with conflicting beliefs and ideas on how the government should be structured and run will not work and will only accelerate the collapse. It is inevitable. And while I do not think we will revert back to feudalism, it surely will result in a few smaller countries, likely divided by race, which is to say, back to the homogenous type society that made this country what it was in the first place. When you realize the end result between immigration and war is the same thing, you will see that immigration is essentially war itself.
Yemen has executed two men for abducting, raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy by shooting them in public.
Wadah Refat, 28, and Mohamed Khaled, 31, had been convicted of raping and murdering a boy named Mohamed Saad in May last year.
Hundreds had gathered in the port city of Aden on Thursday to watch the men get shot dead in front of the baying crowd.The boy had been playing next to a house where one of them lived, when the pair set upon him, dragged him into the home and raped him.
‘After the rape, they could not silence the cries of the child, who begged for help, so one of them grabbed a knife and slit his throat,’ court documents seen by El Mundo states.
A 33-year-old woman has also been sentenced to death for helping Refat and Khaled dismember the boy’s body.
Her execution has been postponed as she is pregnant, according to the website.
This is something I could absolutely get behind. There are few, if any, crimes worse than what these two guys did. We really should bring public executions back. Real justice. And it makes an example for anyone else considering it. Why should these animals get humane deaths when they treat a precious child like utter trash?
I am through with pleasantries and taking the high road. When the atrocious crimes those in Washington DC, Hollywood, and elsewhere have committed to children come out I am sure more people will agree that this is a better course of action than what we currently do, which is to say maybe, MAYBE jail time for some offenders of heinous crimes against children. I have zero tolerance for these people. And before anyone on the left throws their arms up about how horrible and barbaric this is, take note that they actually value human life and are making sure the baby is born before executing the woman. Maybe there is one silver lining to Londonistan becoming a Sharia country after all…
I came across this graphic recently showing some of stories the Washington Post has run about impeaching President Trump.
Could you imagine how much more unified this country might be if only the mainstream media honestly reported the news and facts? What sane person can honestly say President Trump should be impeached? What evidence is there? Please, if anyone has any, enlighten me in the comment section. I really would like to know if it did exist.
Absolutely nothing has been found in this BS Russia investigation. They have combed over every detail of his life, legally and illegally, for over two years now and haven’t found a shred of evidence in any realm to support the notion that he should be impeached. In a sane world, it should give American citizens a sense of relief that their President is squeaky clean. No President in US history has ever been under the scrutiny this one has and they have found nothing on him. I cannot seem to find a similar infographic on constant calls for impeachment for Obama from the Washington Post even though one could make a much more compelling case what with the illegal spying on Americans (and journalists), fast and furious, biased auditing of conservatives, the sketchiness around the Iran deal and the goings on in Syria, to name just a few. But hey, it would be racist to even suggest holding Obama up to the same standard as Trump, so I’ll just be quiet now.