Illinois to introduce bill that would allow for social media background check before approval of gun purchase

Because all that gun crime in Chicago is coming from people purchasing legal firearms, right?  Via CBS Chicago:

“This is something my community is demanding action on,” said Rep. Daniel Didech (D-Buffalo Grove).

That’s why Didech is proposing gun buyers reveal their public social media accounts to Illinois police before they’re approved for a firearm license.

“A lot of people who are having mental health issues will often post on their social media pages that they’re about to hurt themselves or others,” Didech said. “We need to give those people the help they need.”

Pro-gun groups are outraged.

“When people look at this everyone who has a Facebook account or email account or Twitter account will be incensed or should be,” said Richard Pearson with the Illinois State Rifle Association.

Either the community is really stupid or Didech is just saying that to push his gun control agenda.  Clearly the shootings in Chicago are not coming from law abiding citizens purchasing firearms legally.  Even Joe Scarborough realizes that the vast majority of shootings stem from firearms purchased illegally.  Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, and yet every week dozens of people are shot.  Heyjackass.com is a great site to keep track of Chicago’s shootings.

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.13 AM

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.38 AM.png

Something tells me whoever is making this determination of who is fit or not to purchase based on their social media in an ultra-liberal city like Chicago will probably preferentially penalize Trump supporters or anyone who has thoughts contrary to the narrative.  It is usually the SJWs who like to patrol for thoughtcrimes.

Many people will point to some of the school shootings and what was said on social media before them.  As if those guns are procured legally by the kids doing the crimes, or like that is the type of shooting that is common in Chicago.  It is not a stretch to think that parents may be prohibited from purchasing firearms if their kids post something edgy on social media.  After all, the kid could steal the gun and kill kids in school, amiright?  Whatever excuse they can come up with to take guns away from citizens.  They have no shame.

IMG_2915.JPG

End this nonsense once and for all

Via ice.gov:

SANTA ANA, Calif. – Following the arrests this morning of three defendants who allegedly operated “birth tourism” outfits that catered to Chinese clients, federal authorities today unsealed indictments that charge a total of 19 people linked to three schemes that operated across Southern California and charged clients tens of thousands of dollars to help them give birth in the United States.

The indictments charge operators and clients of three “maternity house” or “birthing house” schemes that were dismantled in March 2015 when federal agents executed 35 search warrants, which resulted from international undercover operations.

The 17 cases unsealed today contain the first-ever federal criminal charges brought against operators and customers of birth tourism businesses. The birth tourism operations not only committed widespread immigration fraud and engaged in international money laundering, they also defrauded property owners when leasing the apartments and houses used in their birth tourism schemes, according to the indictments.

These cases were investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Los Angeles. Substantial assistance was provided by IRS Criminal Investigation, as well as the Irvine Police Department and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department.

The indictments describe birth tourism schemes in which foreign nationals, mostly from China, applied for visitor visas to come to the United States and lied about the length of their trips, where they would stay, and the purposes of their trips – which were to come to the U.S. for three months to give birth so their children would receive U.S. birthright citizenship.

“America’s way of life is not for sale,” said Joseph Macias, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Los Angeles. “HSI will aggressively target those who would make a mockery of our laws and our values to benefit and enrich themselves. No one needs to be reminded about the national security and public safety implications of visa fraud and the crimes associated with it. Anyone who would exploit our nation’s generosity and our legal immigration system should be on notice – they may end up being the ones to pay a very steep price.”

And further down:

Three indictments returned Wednesday by a federal grand jury charge the operators of large birth tourism operations based in Orange, Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. Pursuant to this week’s indictments, federal authorities this morning arrested three defendants: Dongyuan Li (李冬媛), 41, of Irvine; Michael Wei Yueh Liu (刘维岳), 53, of Rancho Cucamonga; and Jing Dong (董晶), 42, of Fontana. All three are charged with conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, international money laundering and identity theft. Liu is also charged with filing three false tax returns.

As American as apple pie, right?  This shit needs to stop.  This was never how birthright citizenship was EVER supposed to be interpreted.  It is absolutely insane it ever got this far.  These firms alone have done this for thousands of babies.  It is surely in the tens or hundreds of thousands if not millions for all the other birth tourism centers they haven’t cracked down on yet.

This is how it works.  Whether they come here specifically to birth a child to have a US passport or they cross the border illegally, the result is the same.  More than 60 million people have immigrated to the United States since the disastrous Hart-Celler Act of 1965.  Along with changing the quotas of the kinds of people who could come here, it also opened the door to preferentially allowing relatives of these newcomers first, which has come to be known as chain migration.  If you include chain migration and the children of those who have come here it is around 100 million people since 1965; a rather sizable portion of the population here.

It is becoming increasingly clear that we need to stop immigration altogether if we are to keep any semblance of what we see as our country intact.  Stop both illegal and legal immigration.  Or limit legal immigration to an insanely low number like a few thousand people a year.  Increasingly they are assimilating less and less.  And clearly many do not care about our laws at all.  You think Jing Dong gives a shit about our laws or the wellbeing of our country?

We have been sold a lie.  As Lyndon Johnson famously said of the 1965 act:

This bill we sign today is not a revolutionary bill.  It does not affect the lives of millions.  It will not restructure the shape of our daily lives.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

IMG_8510.jpg

Didn’t change anything at all, huh?

As much as I love President Trump and what he has done for this country, it was a little bit worrying in his State of the Union address saying he wants more legal immigrants than ever.  God bless him, I am sure his heart is in the right place, but it is exactly the opposite of what we need right now if we want to preserve the tattered remains of this country.  But he is a civic nationalist, and strongly believes that those coming will assimilate.  This hasn’t been true for decades, if ever.  Close the birthright citizenship loopholes, tighten the laws, or end immigration altogether for the foreseeable future.  It may be the only thing that will give this country any chance of surviving.

Pure Evil

An old article from 2015 is circulating around voat about reports of Planned Parenthood keeping aborted babies alive to harvest organs.  This is the hill worth dying on, folks.  This is pure evil.  And it is not debatable.  Shame on any pro-choicer who defends funding this institution.  Enough with the pleasantries.  IT IS NOT OKAY TO KEEP BABIES ALIVE TO HARVEST THEIR ORGANS.  I thought I was once pro-choice for very early abortions.  No more.  Via the article:

In an undercover video released Wednesday, a former technician for a tissue-harvesting company details how an aborted baby was kept alive so that its heart could be harvested at a California Planned Parenthood facility, raising more legal questions about the group’s practices.

Holly O’Donnell, a former blood and tissue procurement technician for the biotech startup StemExpress, also said she was asked to harvest an intact brain from the late-term, male fetus whose heart was still beating after the abortion.

StemExpress supervisor “gave me the scissors and told me that I had to cut down the middle of the face. And I can’t even describe what that feels like,” said Ms. O’Donnell, who has been featured in earlier videos by the Center for Medical Progress, a pro-life group that previously had released six undercover clips involving Planned Parenthoodpersonnel and practices.

And a little further down:

California law also prohibits any kind of experimentation on a fetus with a discernible heartbeat, said the Center for Medical Progress, which is calling for the federal government to cease its $500 million a year support to Planned Parenthood and for it to be investigated.

“Today’s video is especially gruesome, and it shows, once again, the barbarity of what takes place at Planned Parenthood clinics across the country,” said Rep. Joseph R. Pitts, Pennsylvania Republican and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health, one of several congressional panels investigating Planned Parenthood.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican and chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said Wednesday that all the videos are “disturbing,” and his committee’s investigation will look into whether “any federal funding supported transactions involving fetal tissue.”

“Top-level employees of Planned Parenthood admit to changing their procedures to harvest intact bodies of unborn children for body-part trafficking,” said Rep. Trent Franks, Arizona Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution and civil justice.

Mr. Franks and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Republican, also said Wednesday that they have written to 58 Planned Parenthood affiliates. They are seeking 10 years of data about all abortions, late-term abortions, “born-alive” infants, fetal tissue collections and any modifications of abortion techniques to “increase the odds of preserving intact fetal tissue and organs.”

Five states — Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Utah and New Hampshire — already have defunded Planned Parenthood.

The video is posted below.  It is a little gruesome at parts, especially from the 5′ 30″ mark going forward.

The article was from 2015.  Planned Parenthood’s annual report from 2017-2018 shows that they are still well funded over half a billion dollars a year from the government.  That is your tax money, folks.

PPFunding2018PieChart

PPFunding2018

This is what happens when you turn away from God.  People can roll their eyes; once upon a time I would have too.  But it is true.  Since we have turned away from Christianity can we honestly say we are better off as a country?  Have we really progressed as a society?  No.  Christianity instilled a moral compass that has been eroded to the point where you are shamed if you question the KILLING OF BABIES.  Where some people will honestly justify this, like it is an acceptable moral position, saying a woman has a right to choose what to do with her body.  NO.  The moment you decide to make a bad decision, the moment you choose to get blackout drunk and sleep with someone you probably don’t even know, you have made your decision.  When another life now depends on your own, you do not have the right to kill it.  Shame on us for ever allowing it to come to this.  Where we cannot even hold that moral position without caving to some BS about “my body my choice”.  It is not progress to kill a human life because a woman wants carte blanche to sleep with as many partners as she wants and then not suffer any of the consequences of her actions.  Even worse is that we are all paying for it.  Why are we funding birth control measures?  Why are we funding abortions?  Yes, Planned Parenthood receives federal reimbursement through Medicaid.  Medicaid covers abortions.

Enough is enough.  Do not commit the sin of omission by sitting idly by knowing what you now know about the situation.  Write your state representatives.  Do not be afraid to call out pro-choicers, feminists, or anyone else who will try to justify this unjustifiable position.  Vote out the politicians who support funding Planned Parenthood.  Consider moving to states that will not fund this.  The reasons continue to pile up for why I should leave California and move back to New Hampshire.  California is at the very heart of all of this.  We all need to step up and take action.  Merely shaking our heads and saying how terrible it is is not enough.  Spread the word.

Girls can now join…Boy Scouts Program (now called Scouts BSA)

Via Breitbart:

A longtime American tradition ended Friday as the Boy Scouts of America officially changed its name to Scouts BSA. Now, girls ages 11 through 17 may join and participate in programs, including earning the Eagle Scout rank.

“For the first time in its 100+ year history, the iconic program of the Boy Scouts of America is open to both young men and young women,” the website states with a photo of girls accompanying the text.

“Scouts BSA is a year-round program for boys and girls in fifth grade through high school that provides fun, adventure, learning, challenge, and responsibility to help them become the best version of themselves,” the website reads.

The continued attack of our nation’s institutions from the SJWs plods on.  This Breitbart commentator put it nicely:

BSAComment

A lot of people will say that is nonsense.  But no, it is not.  This is what they do.  Chip away, chip away, chip away until they have everything and control everything so they can teach what they want and indoctrinate with their poison.  The Boy Scouts caved to pressure and allowed gay members in 2013 and gay leaders in 2015.  2017 opened it up to transgenders.  And 2019 is full-fledged female participation as well.  And on some level this has nothing to do with gays or transgenders or girls.  This isn’t an attack on them.  It is an attack on the BSA for caving to pressure because of identity politics.  And if I were a gambling man I would say the next thing they attack is the scout oath and scout law, which both allude to a duty to God.  Because, you know, this is alienating the atheists.  We cannot risk offending anybody!

Scout Oath
On my honor I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.

Scout Law

The Scout Law has 12 points. Each is a goal for every Scout. A Scout tries to live up to the Law every day. It is not always easy to do, but a Scout always tries.

A Scout is:

TRUSTWORTHY. Tell the truth and keep promises. People can depend on you.

LOYAL. Show that you care about your family, friends, Scout leaders, school, and country.

HELPFUL. Volunteer to help others without expecting a reward.

FRIENDLY. Be a friend to everyone, even people who are very different from you.

COURTEOUS. Be polite to everyone and always use good manners.

KIND. Treat others as you want to be treated . Never harm or kill any living thing without good reason.

OBEDIENT. Follow the rules of your family, school, and pack. Obey the laws of your community and country.

CHEERFUL. Look for the bright side of life. Cheerfully do tasks that come your way. Try to help others be happy.

THRIFTY. Work to pay your own way. Try not to be wasteful. Use time, food, supplies, and natural resources wisely.

BRAVE. Face difficult situations even when you feel afraid. Do what you think is right despite what others might be doing or saying.

CLEAN. Keep your body and mind fit . Help keep your home and community clean.

REVERENT. Be reverent toward God. Be faithful in your religious duties. Respect the beliefs of others.

As with all institutions that kowtow to identity politics, this will likely kill off the institution once and for all.  And given the extent of the metastases I say good riddance at this point.  It is sad it had to come to this.

They are already dealing with a bunch of sexual abuse lawsuits.  I cannot see the number of sexual lawsuits getting any smaller given the demographic of the group now.

The Girl Scouts are rightly disgruntled about this and have sued.  Both institutions are probably done now.  And whether you care about these institutions or not you should still care about how they’re being infested and ruined.  This is how they operate.  They infest.  They are cancer.  They have done it to the Boy Scouts, our schools, and our churches.  Most people will think it is harmless: what does it matter if they allow <insert group here> into <insert institution here>.  You think it stops there?  No.  They take control and then push an agenda that aligns with their ideology.  Much like what is happening now with huge groups of immigrants coming in.  You think they won’t push their own policies when they elect their own people into office?  Of course not.

Forever Victims

An opinion piece from AZCentral:

A few weeks ago, I attended a holiday party at a downtown Phoenix restaurant. I walked around to view the photographs on the wall.

Then a photograph caught my attention.

Friends said, “It’s coal miners at a pub after work.” It was a photograph of coal miners with blackened faces. I asked a Latinx and white woman for their opinion. They said it looked like coal miners at a pub after work. Then they stepped back, frowned and said it’s men in blackface.

I asked the waitress to speak with a manager. Instead, I spoke with a white restaurant owner. I explained to him why the photograph was offensive. Evidently, someone else had made a similar comment about the photograph before.

Yet, the photograph remained on the wall. He said he would talk to the other owners and get back to me. While leaving, I asked him had he spoke with the other owners. He had not spoken with them, but mentioned Google said it’s coal miners after work.

In art, everyone sees something different

Who determines what’s offensive?

For me, the coal miners disappeared and a film honored for its artistic merit, despite being the most racist propaganda films ever, D.W. Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation” (1915) surfaces, in which white actors appeared in blackface. The white owner saw coal miners in the photograph. Therefore, it was not offensive.

And a little further down:

Viewers cannot determine the intention of an artist’s work. Art also exposes society’s blind spots. Blackface is only a glimpse of a larger issue. The larger issue is the lack of representation of marginalized people and their voices in Phoenix.

Frequently, I enter art galleries and I am not represented in the art, which leads to uneducated curation for exhibitions. While shopping I am ignored because it is assumed I unable to purchase anything, or I am followed by a security guard because it is assumed that I am a threat to the store.

Each assumption is based on a stereotype. Blackface caricatures stereotypes of black people.

At the downtown Phoenix restaurant, my concern that the photograph of men in blackface was a threat to me and my face and voice were ignored.

A business’ photograph of men with blackened faces culturally says to me, “Whites Only.” It says people like me are not welcome.

Here is the photograph in question.

coalminers

Coal miners enjoying a beer after work: RACIST!!!

It really is quite sad.  I could not possibly live my life acting like a victim for every single thing I perceive as some kind of assault to my existence.  Newsflash, Rashaad, it is not all about you.  I’m sorry (no) that you aren’t represented in the art at the art gallery you went to.  Similarly, white people don’t sit around all day wondering how we can offend and marginalize black people.  We honestly don’t care that much about you.  Most of us just want to live our lives and be left alone.  You should do the same.

Perpetual victimhood is almost like a disease.  It is the ressentiment that Nietzsche frequently wrote about.  And it is the kind of internal negativity that can destroy a person.  Who wants to live their life as a victim anyways?  Why would you want to give anyone that much control over how you feel and act?  Stop being so pathetically weak and whiny.

Lastly, Rashaad, the world you are asking for would be a totalitarian shithole.  You could not possibly put out any art if the deciding factor was whether it offended someone or not.  That is completely insane.

More abortion atrocities

This time in Virginia.  A bill has been proposed there to abort up to…and after…birth.  Via freebeacon.com:

Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D.) commented Wednesday about a controversial 40-week abortion bill and in so doing said the law allows an abortion to take place after the infant’s birth.

“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.

A Democratic lawmaker in the Virginia House of Delegates proposed a bill Tuesday that would allow abortions through the end of the third trimester of pregnancy. The video of Delegate Kathy Tran presenting her bill led to an exchange where she admitted that her bill would allow for a mother to abort her child minutes before giving birth.

“How late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated that it would impair the mental health of the woman?” Majority Leader Todd Gilbert (R.) asked.

“Or physical health,” Tran said.

“Okay,” Gilbert replied. “I’m talking about the mental health.”

“I mean, through the third trimester,” Tran said. “The third trimester goes up to 40 weeks.”

“Okay, but to the end of the third trimester?” Gilbert asked.

“Yup, I don’t think we have a limit in the bill,” Tran said.

“Where it’s obvious that a woman is about to give birth, she has physical signs that she’s about to give birth, would that still be a point at which she could request an abortion if she was so certified?” Gilbert asked. “She’s dilating.”

Tran responded that is a decision between the woman and her doctor would have to make. Gilbert asked if her bill would allow an abortion right before the infant was born.

“My bill would allow that, yes,” Tran said.

And a little further down:

Northam continued by saying government shouldn’t be involved in these types of decisions and that legislators, especially male legislators, shouldn’t be telling women what to do.

“I think this was really blown out of proportion. But again we want the government not to be involved in these types of decisions. We want the decision to be made by the mothers and their providers. And this is why Julie, that legislators, most of whom are men by the way, shouldn’t be telling a woman what she should or shouldn’t be doing with her body,” Northam said.

I don’t need to be a woman to know that it’s fucking MURDER to abort a baby 10 seconds before a woman gives birth.  Lady, that is not your right.  Do these people have any compassion at all?  How utterly self-centered and morally deprived does one have to be to take the position that this is okay?  This is pure evil.

Again, as with the NY abortion law, this country may not be worth saving if this is the direction we are going to go.  I do not want to live in a country where this becomes acceptable.  We have to fight back against this.  Literally murdering children.

Are people enjoying the civilization we have now since we removed Christ from the equation?  Is this really better?  Do people really feel like we’ve hit some kind of moral nirvana, some higher level of moral consciousness, since we became a post-Christian nation?  I for one do not think allowing babies to be murdered seconds before they are born, or after they are born, is a step in the right direction.  I will post this video once again as long as the link stays up to remind people what a third trimester abortion entails.

FBI finds no motive in Vegas shooting. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Our trustworthy FBI has let us know that there is no specific motive in the deadliest shooting in modern American history.  So, just like, forget about it guys.  Move along.  Via Breitbart:

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A high-stakes gambler who rained a hail of gunfire down on a crowd of country music fans, killing 58, took any specific motive for the 2017 attack to his grave, the FBI said Tuesday as it concluded the investigation into the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

The agency found no “single or clear motivating factor” to explain why Stephen Paddock carried out the attack from his suite in a high-rise casino hotel. The 64-year-old fatally shot himself as police closed in.

“It wasn’t about MGM, Mandalay Bay or a specific casino or venue,” Aaron Rouse, the agent in charge of the FBI’s Las Vegas office, told The Associated Press. “It was all about doing the maximum amount of damage and him obtaining some form of infamy.”

The finding was contained in a long-awaited report compiled by the FBI’s Behavior Analysis Unit, a group of experts who spent months examining several factors that might have led to the rampage.

“This report comes as close to understanding the why as we’re ever going to get,” Rouse said.

Let me rephrase that last part for you.  This report comes as close as we want you, the American public, to understanding the why as we’re ever going to allow you to get.

They either really do take us as total suckers or they’re just scrambling at this point because they’ve needed to cover stuff up at a frenetic pace since President Trump took office and started shaking things up.  To be clear: this is a total FBI coverup.  They know exactly the motive, exactly who was involved, exactly why it happened.  It seems really strange that in Las Vegas, literally probably the most video taped city on Earth, there is no footage available?  Or how about the fact that a lot of people witnessed a second gunman?  Or the entire storyline regarding the Saudi prince and the floors right above the shooter’s floor?  I almost linked to the above theories but every link has YouTube videos that have been removed.  Probably just a coincidence.

They are covering up something they do not want us to see or ask about.  This is where we our with some of our alphabet institutions in the United States now.  This is why we’ve elected President Trump to drain the swamp and eliminate the rot.  The FBI seems to be rotten to the core.  I have no doubt there are many hard working patriots still there, but it has been completely infested with traitors from the top on down.  Much like the JFK assassination, 9/11, WACO, etc, you will likely never get the full picture of what really happened.  They’ve been at this gig a long time.

PS – Not saying this is the case, but would it shock you if this was a false flag to push gun control more?  The fact I can ask that question without immediately being laughed out of the room tells you how far we’ve fallen as a country for that to even be a potential consideration.

Decision time for the Catholic Church

The Catholic Church, in some respects rightfully so, has lost some of its clout and its standing as a positive institution to the general public, especially in the last few decades.  There are myriad reasons for this but sexual abuse scandals in particular have been a huge part of it.  Author Frédéric Martel, a homosexual socialist himself, is releasing a book soon, In the Closet of the Vatican, which is to shine more light on the situation.  In a press conference set for today lifesitenews.com reports:

According to the press release, the new book will “expose the rot at the heart of the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church today.” For this book, the author has done research for four years and in thirty different countries, and he has conducted “extensive interviews with those in power.”

Martel claims to be able to show us with his new book the underlying connection between the following topics: the celibacy of priests, the condemnation of the use of contraceptives, the cover-up of countless cases of sexual abuse, the resignation of Benedict XVI, misogyny among the clergy, the dramatic fall of  vocations to the priesthood, the plotting against Pope Francis.” His book is meant to “reveal these secrets.”

Martel describes in his book, according to the press release, a “system founded on a clerical culture of secrecy which starts in junior seminars and continues right up to the Vatican itself.” It is also based on “the double lives of priests and on extreme homophobia.” Thus, according to this book, there exists a certain “schizophrenia in the Church.”

According to the press release, however, “the more a prelate is homophobic, the more likely it is that he is himself gay.” “Behind rigidity there is always something hidden, in many cases a double life.” These words of Pope Francis are being specifically quoted because he himself  “unlocked the Closet” of the Vatican.

And a little bit further down:

While these pro-homosexual authors like Sullivan and Martel might wish to promote the acceptance of homosexuality in the Church, Michael Voris explains, people like Father James Martin, S.J. go into a similar direction, though not yet fully claiming: “change the Church’s teaching!” “But he has said,” Voris adds, “change that [expression] ‘objectively disordered’, get rid of that in the Catechism.”

Voris actually calls Father Martin out, saying that “we have various Jesuit seminarians telling us that in private at their private retreats, Martin admits to [his] being gay.”

“[Father Martin,] Refute what we are saying,” Voris adds. “You now have the opportunity to deny it.” For Voris, the Jesuit Martin is “another gay priest who is going around trying to change the Church’s teaching.”

Further discussing the article written by Andrew Sullivan, Voris comments “Sullivan thinks ‘dump the teaching [on homosexuality].’” “We would say: […] don’t dump the teaching,” as Church Militant’s Bradley Eli responds. Voris adds that he recently spoke with a bishop who told him that “he knows a number of bishops who are gay.”

Commenting on Martel’s upcoming book, Christine Niles says: “Nobody likes a hypocrite, nobody likes a liar. Nobody likes people who lead double lives.” “If you take a vow,” she continues, “and you promised chastity and continence, but you are secretly breaking that vow, people like him [Martel] they don’t like that.” Niles and Voris agree with Martel on this point, saying “he is correct on that.”

Commenting on Martel’s claim that the homosexual network within the Vatican is much bigger than expected, Niles says that the book will be an “eye opener” for many Catholic lay people about the fact that “the Vatican is essentially being run, largely, by homosexuals.” Voris also then mentions the Polish priest, Father Dariusz Oko, who told Church Militant years ago that “half of the guys running the Vatican are gay.” (See here for an interview with Father Oko.)

This is a pretty huge decision point for the Church.  They have an opportunity here to either push back against the horrifying amounts of rot and decay amongst their ranks, or make it even worse by normalizing and accepting it.  There is an interesting subplot of the whole book release in the intentions of the author.  Everyone agrees the homosexuality and abuse scandals need to be exposed and dealt with.  The author clearly has an agenda of outing this stuff to normalize homosexuality in the Catholic Church.  And it wouldn’t shock me for one second if it was discovered Pope Francis was gay.

But the Church needs to decide what to do with this now.  I suspect I know the direction they will go, but we will see.  They have an opportunity to use the book to bare all, acknowledge a huge problem, and deal with it swiftly by expelling all of these priests who lead these double lives, against their vows, and start anew.  Anything less would likely be a continued decay of the Church into obscurity and even more of an enemy to true Christianity.

Whether you are Catholic or not, all Christians should hope and pray for true reform in the Catholic Church.  The opinion of Christianity, fair or not, is usually linked to that of the Catholic Church.  When the Catholic Church is engaging in un-Christian activities, fair or not that is viewed across the entirety of Christianity as a whole.  This ripple effect is what turns many people off to Christianity, when in reality they are seeing decisions made by humans misinterpreting (or even more sinister, on purpose) Christ’s teachings and applying it to the Church.  It would be a very slippery slope to normalize homosexuality in the Church and I think it would turn off many of the Church’s members.  If the Church were smart, going forward they would allow the clergy to marry, and maybe even require it.  Whether you agree with homosexuality or not it should trouble everyone when clergy LIE about it and bottle it up to the point it becomes so repressed that the pressure is released through terrible acts.  Allow clergy to marry and not only will it flush out some of the rot but will open the door to many more potential clergy, given that they are having problems attracting more anyway.  The alternative, as the author hopes, in normalizing homosexuality and opening it up more in the Church, I fear, would be another step down the ladder away from true Christianity in an institution that is already struggling greatly.

Duke professor steps down after suggesting students should speak English on campus

Diversity is our strength.  Diversity is our strength.  Diversity is our strength.  Tell yourself this mantra day and night for the next year.  It will totally make it true.  Via Inside Higher Ed:

Duke University asked a professor to step down from her administrative role after she sent an email to students advising them not to speak Chinese in the medical school building and suggesting that failure to speak in English in nonclassroom settings could make it harder for them to get jobs and internships and secure research opportunities with faculty.

Megan Neely, an assistant professor and director of graduate studies for a master’s program in biostatistics, sent an email Friday to first- and second-year students in the program warning them of what she wrote were complaints from two other unnamed professors about students speaking in Chinese in the student lounge and study areas.

“Hi All,” Neely wrote. “I had two separate faculty members come to my office today and ask if I had pictures of the [master’s in biostatistics] students. I shared with them the head shots of the first- and second-year cohorts taken during orientation. Both faculty members picked out a small group of first-year students who they observed speaking Chinese (in their words, VERY LOUDLY) in the student lounge/study areas. I asked why they were curious about the students’ names. Both faculty members replied that they wanted to write down the names so they could remember them if the students ever interviewed for an internship or asked to work with them for a master’s project. They were disappointed that these students were not taking the opportunity to improve their English and were being so impolite as to have a conversation that not everyone on the floor could understand.” (Emphasis per original email.)

Neely’s email continued, “To international students, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE keep these unintended consequences in mind when you choose to speak in Chinese in the building. I have no idea how hard it has been and still is for you to come to the U.S. and have to learn in a non-native language. As such, I have the upmost respect for what you are doing. That being said, I encourage you to commit to using English 100 percent of the time when you are in Hock or any other professional setting.”

And the reaction from the Asian Students Association:

“This behavior is not only hypocritical — given Duke’s dependence on international students and faculty for their undergraduate and graduate programs, desire to present itself as a ‘global university’, and partnership with Duke Kunshan University — but also discriminatory,” the Asian Students Association at Duke and the Duke International Association said in a joint statement about the emails on Facebook. Duke Kunshan is a reference to Duke’s branch campus in China.

Inevitable in 2019 in America.  Everyone is a victim and there is no common language or culture or shared values.  This is what happens when you import all that multiculturalism has to offer.

To recap: professor is told by other professors that some students were speaking obnoxiously loud in another language.  Professor, looking out for the students, mind you, suggests that they should take advantage of the opportunity to practice their English skills while on campus, which may even help them get research opportunities.  Reaction: outrage and she has to step down.

A few things.  This wouldn’t be an issue in a predominantly homogeneous society.  A country with 90%+ of people of the same nationality, with the same culture, the same language, the same beliefs, makes things a lot easier and run a lot smoother.  That ship has clearly sailed for the United States in its current form.  As mentioned yesterday, it should always behoove the guests of a country to respect the laws and the customs of the host country.  Expressing outrage, at a SUGGESTION, is not respecting the host country.  Though we are seeing this increasingly more and more from visitors.  As if it needed to be said again, apologizing to the outrage mob will never absolve you in their eyes.  It will only show weakness and they will continue to pounce until you are out.

College campuses have been the breeding ground for this type of behavior since at least the 1960s.  It will only get worse.  With the current trajectories there will be a time in the not so distant future where students demand signs and translators in English, Spanish, Chinese, and who knows what else.  This is what happens when you do not encourage assimilation.  Every tribe of people will bring THEIR same customs and cultures and languages to America and not bother learning OUR customs, our culture, our language.  Remind me again, who wants this?

Porn is degenerate: bad for you, and destroys society

It has been written about many times before but it always deserves a revisit or refresher; watching copious amounts of porn is terrible for you.  And as we have seen with many other topics of late, whether it is the mainstream media, the pharmaceutical industry, or Google and YouTube censoring search results and/or promoting certain websites over others, there’s probably a much darker side to it as well, which is really more what I’m interested in with this post.

But it would be foolish not to reiterate the former point too.  Watching porn on a regular basis is not healthy.  It can lead to a loss of libido and the ability to get and maintain an erection.  Repeated dopamine hits reduces the stimulation and can lead to needing to find more and more, kinkier and kinkier videos to keep the sensation up.  It is probably a similar feeling to drug addicts chasing that first high.

But is there really more to this?  Is there really anything more dark or sinister going on or any worse than just a few teenagers not being able to perform?  Knowing what we know about how the likes of Facebook, Google, YouTube, Apple, etc censor what we see or skew search results to drive certain narratives, would it really be that surprising if the same were happening with porn as well?  I don’t think many people realize the level of programming that goes on in this country.  The subliminal messages in every commercial (or really shitty attempts at it, Gillette).  We have targeted ads thrown at us in our social media and email accounts.  A constant bombardment of sensory input, much of it with a very specific goal or idea in mind.

Back to the porn.  Pornhub is one of, if not the biggest, porn sites on the internet.  In 2018 they had over 33.5 billion visits.  Billion.  With a B.  And this was a 5 billion visit increase from 2017…not a trivial amount.  Which probably points to a more worrying trend in that the amount of porn being watched is probably going up, not going down.  Pornhub has a section called “Insights” and it is part of a very detailed report they have put out for the past 6 or so years.  It offers details on search trends, broken down by category and country, average visit times, and much more.  As mentioned before, porn destroys not only the individual man but society on the whole as well.  An increase towards more porn being watched, if current trends continue, does not bode well for society.  Birth rates are already at a 30-year low.  Testosterone levels are dropping.  Porn may be causally linked to both of these.  Even if it is not it does not portend good things in the long term.

But is it even worse than that?  Porn is already a cheap dopamine hit to the system…a superficial payoff with none of the work or buildup required.  Generally speaking the more porn one watches, the more desensitized they get to it as well.  Which requires watching more porn, or perhaps kinkier porn.  Might this also be an area one could control one’s thoughts and habits and desires?  Let’s take a look at some of the most common porn search terms on Pornhub through the years, starting with 2013.

pornhub-top-searches-worldwide-2013a.png

For all intents and purposes that looks like a pretty normal set of search terms.  Something is noticeably different starting in 2014…

pornhub-2014-top-searches-world

Something you’ll notice with a lot of these searches throughout the years is they have a partially cultural input to them.  Other terms really get you wondering psychologically.    But the whole, mom, step mom, step sister thing is bad.  Incest porn is not healthy.  There is no place for it in society.  Whether or not it’s free or legal to do it or post videos on it doesn’t mean we should.  I was thinking perhaps it was caused by Game of Thrones and the incest subplot going on in there.  You’ll see in the later years video games often drive top results too.  Or the fact that Stormy Daniels was the most searched for porn star in 2018.  This incest trend continues all the way through 2018.

2-pornhub-insights-2016-year-review-top-search-terms.png

Incest porn, or “taboo” as they sometimes call it, continued to surge in 2016 taking 3 of the top 6 spots overall.  Notice overwatch jumping up there.  Every year there’s a porn star or genre that surges because of current events or currently hot games or TV shows.  Most die out after a year or two.  The incest thing keeps chugging along though.  2017…

1-pornhub-insights-2017-year-review-most-searched-terms-world.png

Incest continued to keep 3 of the top 6 slots in 2017.  There is a bit of an anomaly in 2018 but it is mostly consistent…

1-pornhub-insights-2018-year-review-most-searched-terms-2018.png

This one is a bit stranger.  Mom and step mom are still top 10 but step sister disappears completely.  Note that in all previous years that nothing in the top 10 ever drops so utterly off the map that you don’t see it in the next year.  It is only ever one of the lower genres that gets knocked off by the game of the moment (fortnight) or something along those lines.  It doesn’t really add up.

Maybe something else is at play.  Maybe the search result really is just going down.  Though I find that hard to believe when I click on “This week’s most viewed porn videos in US” and literally the first video is entitled: “Bratty Sis – Cock teasing StepSis Gets P**** Creamed S7:E6”.  Yeah it’s old-fashioned but I put the asterisks there.  Three of the top six most viewed are incest related, the other two being step mom/son fantasies.

This is not normal.  This is not healthy.  I don’t care if it’s technically legal to show this stuff.  It is not healthy for the individual or for society at large.  In 2019, would you really be so flabbergasted or shocked to learn that maybe they’re also trying to brainwash you with all the porn you’re watching?  And who knows for what twisted, perverted, fucked up purpose.  Encouraging incest IS NOT GOOD.  You can say that people can tell the difference, or that it would never lead anywhere, but are you really so sure of that?  Imagine planting that little seed into someone’s head every day that maybe it’s okay.  Oh, it’s just a step sibling, not blood related.  Oh, it’s just fantasy.  Is it really so far fetched to see that maybe some people would take that as enough of a cue to rationalize it being okay?  Where do we end up long term if that seed ever takes root?

These people are trying to destroy the nuclear family.  They are trying to introduce degeneracy and destruction into your lives.  These are dark, sick, twisted people.  If you haven’t already, take a look at the work that Jamie Dlux is doing reporting on the absolute abhorrent stuff coming out of Hollywood.  It’s not like the porn industry is any cleaner.  Suffice to say I’m a little suspicious with the amount of twisted incest porn and interracial sex videos posted (especially when the latter is a search term that is never in the top searches yet these videos seem to be pushed incessantly hard).  At the very least, consider the possibility that maybe there’s more going on here than just an innocent fap.