Black Facts Matter

Jerome Hudson wrote an excellent piece on Breitbart about black crime statistics.  It should be an eye-opener for those not paying attention and runs totally counter to what the MSM wants you to believe, mainly that white cops are racist and white people are out to get black people all the time, as if they had nothing better to do.  Five facts from the article:

FACT 1. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968.

According to FBI data, 4,906 black people murdered other blacks in 2010 and 2011. That is 1,460 more black Americans killed by other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968, according to the Tuskegee Institute.

FACT 2. Black People (mostly men) commit a grossly disproportionate amount of crime.

In 2012, white males were 38 percent of the population and committed 4,582 murders. That same year, black males were just 6.6 percent of the population but committed a staggering 5,531 murders.

In other words: black people–at just a fifth of the size–committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts.

The figures above highlight a horrific truth that black racialists and white liberals routinely ignore: Lawbreaking black Americans, young black males particularly, put themselves in close proximity to (mostly white male) police officers at rates sometimes five to 10 times higher than whites. This is a recipe for disaster. Thusly….

FACT 3. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years.

DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, black people committed 52% of homicides.

In 2013, black criminals committed 38% of the murders. Whites accounted for just 31 percent.

There are five times fewer black people than white people in America and, yet, they consistently carry out a larger share of the crimes? Given this rate, it’s no wonder that there aren’t more assistances where cops kill black criminals.

FACT 4. Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined.

There have been almost as many deaths in one American city as there have been in the two major wars carried out by the U.S. military this century.

Chicago’s death toll from 2001November, 26 2015 stands at 7,401. The combined total deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2015: 4,815) and Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan (2001-2015: 3,506), total 8,321.

FACT 5. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone.

University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest crime data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports and Centers for Disease Control and found that an average of 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012.

Professor Johnson’s research further concluded that 112 black men died from both justified and unjustified police-involved killings annually during this same period.

Black Lives Matter does not care about black people.  If they truly did you’d hear more about programs to end black on black violence.  Instead they only ever come out of the woodwork when there’s an altercation between a white cop and black man.  As the article points out, the rare white-cop-killing-black-man shouldn’t be surprising given the amount of times a cop is needed for a crime committed by a black man.  It has nothing to do with racism.  The recent onslaught of bodycam footage only confirms this.

And as with most causes the left supports these days, their motives are often hidden by superficial fronts of “equality” or “justice” or something of the sort.  The left pushes racism in this regard to further an agenda, much like they push school shootings to try and push gun control, when in reality the facts pretty much always discredit what they are saying.

This is why so many hold so much disdain for the mainstream media.  They push lies that are utterly destructive and divisive.  It’s why many think they are an enemy of the state, and rightfully so.  Mainstream journalism seems to have died years ago.  And when 6 companies control 90% of the media in America it used to be easy to set and control the narrative.  This has changed a bit in the past few years as alternative media has had a meteoric rise and chipped away at the credibility of the CNNs of the world.  Imagine if mainstream media actually worked to publish facts as they came up, not based on a narrative, but just to actually report the news as it happened.  The fact that sentence even needs to be typed out tells you all you need to know about the state we’re in.

Louisiana AG deny $600 million deal to BoA, Citibank over gun control

Louisiana firing shots across the bow!  Via Breitbart:

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and the state’s Bond Commission denied $600 million to Citibank and Bank of America over the gun control stance adopted by both companies.

Citibank and Bank of America were both to be part of a road financing plan in the state, but were omitted from the financial plan after arbitrarily placing new gun controls on banking customers.

Louisiana Executive Division press secretary Ruth Wisher told Breitbart News that Landry and State Treasurer John Schroder have been working on the state’s response to corporate gun control “for some time.” Omitting them from the $600 million is part of that response.

On March 23, 2018, Breitbart News reported Citibank’s new gun control regulations, which require gun store customers to quit selling “high capacity” magazines in order to do business with the bank. Citibank also demanded bank store customers refuse long gun sales to anyone 18-20 years old, even though long gun sales to 18-20-year-olds are legal (and 18-20-year-olds can use fully automatic weapons in the U.S. military).

On April 13, 2018, Reuters reported that Bank of America was reworking their policy so as to end with customers “who make military-style firearms for civilians”  Bank of America does not differentiate between the fact that military rifles are fully automatic, whereas civilian firearms are only semiautomatic.

I will never understand why large corporations with customers on both sides of a topic will alienate 50% of their clientele.  It’s probably a huge misread by their marketing departments thinking their virtue signaling will do them some good.  The reality is most customers don’t want the damn companies they’re buying products from to display any political opinion whatsoever.  This will only get them into trouble.

It’s sad how blind the left is to their own bullying and discriminatory tactics.  “All are welcome” so long as you agree with exactly everything they say.  They’ve done this before.  Last year Harvard had a commencement just for black students.  Willful segregation.  And I’m actually all for it; freedom of association.  I just want the response to be the same and just as accepted if ever the alternative were to occur.  Though I’m sure the response would not be the same.

It’s not hard to imagine a world where there’s one set of stores for conservatives and another for liberals at this pace.  That’s really what it appears that they want by having banks preferentially choosing which customers to serve.  The only option will be to have conservative only banks that do allow you to buy guns.  It’s nice to see Louisiana taking a hard stance on this subject.  The only way corporations will bend and change their ways is if they feel it in the wallet.  That’s the only pressure they will ever bow to.

The Most Dangerous Game

The left is crossing into dangerous territory.  It’s not just hyperbole when I say they are pushing us ever closer to a civil war.  They are continually attacking Constitutional liberties that were set in place to protect all citizens.

For a long time the second amendment was their issue du jour.  Their ultimate goal is to ban all firearms, an incredibly naive and short sighted move.  The power players on the left use the majority of the left as “useful idiots” to further their actual agenda.  The useful idiots push the narrative under the guise that they think everyone will be safer if nobody has weapons.  This is a common tactic we’ll see throughout our dealings with the Cabal and the agenda they are pushing.  Whether it’s guns, free speech, or other forms of indoctrination they will continually use the left to push these points under the guise of a different reason.

Anybody who has studied any history knows that disarming the populace is not the path towards a safer society but rather towards an oppressive regime and genocide.  There are well known examples in Russia, China, and Germany.  Great Britain likes to boast they are basically gun-free and how is it going for them?  Or Venezuela?  Hitler famously said, “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.“.

This issue tends to creep up after another shooting.  Always in a gun-free zone, but that’s besides the point.  Of course, only when it suits their agenda.  Did you hear about the 72 people shot, 13 people killed in Chicago this weekend?  Me neither.  MSM will not report this stuff on a grand scale.

At the moment, they’ve moved up to attacking our greatest freedom, which is of course freedom of speech.  This past week has been a circus, with much buzz about InfoWars being deplatformed on Facebook, Google, Apple, and Spotify.  Again, this is a blatant attempt of the left to suppress free speech, and more specifically speech they disagree with.  A few sites have stuck up for Alex Jones, notably Twitter (surprisingly).

How do they think this will end?  We know what the ultimate goal of the Cabal is in this case, but your ordinary, garden variety left leaning person agreeing with this is troubling.  How short sighted are these people?  Do they really see that this precedent could someday (and inevitably) be used against them?  We already see it now.  When Obama was in office and they had control of the House and Senate they used tactics and many executive orders to get what they wanted.  Now that the other side uses similar tactics all they do is complain.

So called “hate speech”, a completely absurd yet clever spin concocted by the left is what needs to be protected most of all.  It’s easy to defend the stuff you agree with, not so much the stuff you don’t want to hear.  It’s clear many on the left are short sighted so they cannot see the implications of their actions when they cry for the government or big tech companies to ban websites and personalities they do not like.  And given that big tech is almost completely comprised of left leaning types at this point in time it’s easy for them to suppress voices and opinions they disagree with.  Facebook and Twitter have recently come under attack for selectively censoring viewpoints they do not agree with.

I say again, how do they think this will end?  Do they really think the portion of the country that is selectively policed by the other side, while they’re being told “hey it’s for your own good” is just going to sit there and take it when they see the rules used differently for some people as compared to others?  We’re continually told “don’t worry, we can be trusted in how we police” yet there is zero evidence they can be trusted and a mountain of evidence on the contrary.  We know this to be entirely true.  Recently, conservative journalist Candace Owens retweeted something racist NY Times journalist Sarah Jeong wrote about white people, but replaced “white” with “Jewish” and “black”.  What was the result?

Twitter later responded by saying it was a mistake.  Right.  Funny how these mistakes only seem to happen to people on the right.  This is the double standard I speak about all the time.  As if the useful idiots won’t have this turned against them once the purge is complete.

Rightly so, conservatives are pushing alt-tech to create new platforms that truly respect freedom of speech.  Sites like BitChute and Gab have made some nice inroads but have a long way to go.  Sadly, even these sites are not entirely safe from leftist policing.  Microsoft has threatened to stop hosting Gab due to supposed “hate speech” posts.  They truly are pushing for such segregation that nothing will be able to be shared between those who believe in freedom and those who want more government control and suppression.

This will not end well.  Those who still believe in the principles this country were founded on will only take so much before they finally snap and hit back.  It is imperative we try and solve this peacefully if at all possible.  I wish I could say for sure that this was achievable, but the violent and oppressive tactics the left have been using will force the hand of those reasonable people on the other side eventually.  Perhaps it’s as good a time as any to remind ourselves of Rudyard Kipling’s poem, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon.

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

St Paul residents arming up

St Paul, Minnesota is traditionally not known as a hotbed for shootings.  That seems to be changing, as many residents are arming up due a summer crime spree.  Via kstp.com:

“They are so scared and to have 24 people in less than two-and-a-half months applying for permits to carry in one area is unheard of,” Gene said.

Dee Walsh told KSTP she’s lived in the North End neighborhood for 38 years and just this week she witnessed a gun incident at a nearby store and an even more frightening experience outside her home last summer.

“There were two cars shooting at each other at the end of the driveway,” Walsh said. “So, I had to run inside and check on my grandson and husband to make sure none of the bullets ended up in the house.”

Walsh said the situation has reached, for her family, a point of no return.

“In my neighborhood, it is gunshots every day. Night, or day, it doesn’t matter and we don’t even go into the backyard anymore, my garden is dying and we are moving,” Walsh said. “We are putting our house up for sale.”

Anyone should hesitate to draw conclusions, but some demographic data for Minnesota shows some revealing trends that may shine some light on the situation.  While these stats may be shocking (or not) or disturbing they still need to be shared and considered in the overall grand scheme.

MinnesotaChangeByRace

Minnesota, like so many other parts of the country, is experiencing a significant change in their demographics.  Minnesota Compass has done a nice job amassing stats and providing trends.  Two in particular that stand out:

Minnesota is home to a smaller share of residents of color than many other states, but the pace of population growth among people of color is relatively quick. Among the 50 states, Minnesota continues to rank among the states with smaller shares of residents of color (38th). The state has seen 20 percent growth in its population of color since 2010 – tenth highest among states.

And

Since 2010, four regions have experienced a net loss of non-Hispanic white residents: Northland, Northwest, Southern, and Southwest. Net gains in residents of color in the Northwest and Southern regions have helped these regions maintain positive population growth. Net gains in residents of color in the other two regions have not been large enough to offset overall population decline.

MinnesotaPOC

Minnesota’s population is seeing a decline in non-Hispanic whites and a significant increase in persons of color.  African Americans and Hispanics in particular continue to make up a greater portion of the overall population.

MinnesotaTrend

Perhaps it’s just a coincidence, but the noticeable increase in shootings coupled with the demographic change should give one pause.  It’s often said that diversity + proximity = war.  Perhaps the magic soil of America hasn’t worked its hocus pocus yet on the new population to create law abiding and productive members of society.  It won’t be very surprising how they explain away these statistics in order to shield the guilty parties, whomever they may be, but the more people wake up to what’s going on the better off we will all be.  I wonder why they just don’t make St Paul a gun-free zone?

Connecticut man jailed for defending himself instead of running away

Via ctpost:

A Bridgeport man who was assaulted by three juveniles while he was at work in Norwalk will have to spend 18 months in jail for stabbing one of the attackers.

“I was defending myself,” Jeffrey Sumpter, 21, told Judge John Blawie on Monday morning at the Stamford courthouse when he was sentenced for stabbing one of the males in the leg last October. Blawie told Sumpter that he understood and believed his version of events, but he said he had to follow the letter of the law.

Sumpter, dressed in a white prison jumpsuit with short sleeves, did not reply. His public defender Howard Ehring said unlike a state like Florida, which has a law allowing its residents to stand their ground, Connecticut law requires Sumpter to retreat from the beating he was given at the Dunkin’ Donuts where he worked. After being assaulted inside the coffee shop, Sumpter ran outside and stabbed one of the men.

Under Connecticut law victims cannot use deadly force if they’re able to retreat.  Pathetic.  It was 3 on 1, and one of the attackers had shotgun shells.  Where are we that you can get thrown in jail for defending yourself in a 3 on 1 attack.  On the other side of the coin, 27 states have “stand your ground” laws that allow you to defend yourself.  The fact that this has to be a law at all is ridiculous.

Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signs gun seizure bill

RINO Charlie Baker has signed a bill for temporary gun confiscation with no due process.  Via Daily Caller:

Republican Gov. Charlie Baker signed a bill on Tuesday allowing for temporary gun confiscation without any due process in Massachusetts.

Bill H4670 enables the police, a family or household member, including roommates, relatives or significant others, to remove firearms, firearm identification cards and ammunition from any individual deemed to be a danger to oneself or others.

Surrendered goods can be confiscated for up to one year, with the ability to renew the order, but an individual can try to appeal the ruling.

In a time where there has been increased violence and threats to conservatives, for an alleged conservative to sign this bill is an absolute affront to our personal liberties.  The feral left has ramped up their attacks significantly since traitor Maxine Waters called for increased harassment to President Trump’s officials is unforgivable.  Consider for a second the fact that now in Boston you could have a feral SJW roommate, and on a whim she could decide to come into your room and take your gun away because her sick beliefs make it feel warranted.  Maybe she feels her safe space has been invaded.  You then have  to fight in court for potentially years to get it back.  Absolutely insane.  The second amendment has been rigorously attacked for decades now.  A new Supreme Court Justice needs to be appointed quickly, and they should repeal every law that chips away at our 2A rights.  It’s gone way too far.  Even mental background checks, do you feel like you can fully trust a professional’s opinion anymore?  What if that professional is a devout leftist and SJW?  Do you really think they could judge the situation dispassionately and objectively?  Neither do I.

The Kennedy retirement should bode well for 2A preservation

There are a lot of issues to discuss regarding Justice Kennedy’s upcoming retirement, which we will over the course of the next few weeks.  Justice Kennedy was a moderate conservative and often times the swing vote in very close cases, including those for gay rights and abortion.  With him gone, many on the feral left are freaking out.  Another area, which has been largely ignored by the Supreme Court in general, is the issue of gun control.  Via the Huffington Post:

There has been a lot of speculation about why the five court conservatives, including Kennedy, have not reviewed any of the lower court cases upholding various gun restrictions. The most common theory is that neither the four conservatives other than Kennedy, nor the four liberals, knew how Kennedy was going to vote.

Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor, and author of one of the most important books ever written on the Second Amendment, Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in Americaspeculated in 2014 that among the other justices that “there must be some concern about the way Kennedy is going to go” in future gun cases. Well, that concern is now moot.

And:

The Supreme Court has only ruled in favor of an individual right to own guns in two decisions, and in neither one did Kennedy write his own opinion. He did, however, make up one of the five votes in both 2008’s D.C. v. Heller, and 2010’s McDonald v. City of Chicago. Both cases invalidated complete bans on possessing handguns in each city. The Supreme Court has not, however, returned to the Second Amendment since McDonald was decided, despite thousands of lower court cases wrestling with the balance between the right to keep and bear arms and public safety.

So it looks like he begrudgingly upheld 2A in two cases, didn’t write an opinion piece on either, and the Supreme Court was afraid to review anymore 2A cases because they weren’t sure how he would vote.  This is all a moot point now with him gone.  President Trump will surely nominate someone much more conservative and pro 2A.  And with the changes to how one can be nominated by a simple majority rather than 60 votes, so long as President Trump nominates before any potential changes at the mid-term elections he should be able to get in whomever he wants.

This bodes well for America.  Pro-Western men need to constantly remind themselves that we are dealing with children on the left.  You need to drag them kicking and screaming to truth and what is right.  Treat them how you would treat your children.  You wouldn’t let your children stay up all hours of the night and eat candy just because they wanted to.  No.  The same goes here.  Even though they will not like it, the changes we are trying to make will benefit them just as much as they benefit us.

This is another reason I abhor “never-Trumpers” like little Ben Shapiro.  Supreme Court Justice nomination was the most important election issue of all, with immigration reform a close second.  With President Trump’s nomination this will cement a majority conservative Supreme Court for decades to come.  Especially considering one or two other leftist Justices will likely be retiring soon, it is game over at the Supreme Court level for some time.  And that is great for everyone.