248 counties have more registered voters than eligible voters

Eric Eggers in his new book “Fraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election” says that 248 counties have more registered voters than eligible voters.  Via Breitbart:

“You have 248 counties in this country that have more registered voters than you have citizens of legal voting age … nearly three million people are registered to vote in more than one state,” Egger said. “Even Barack Obama’s … administration said that yeah, maybe 16 million election registrations are completely inaccurate. And in some states, this is as many as one-in-seven [registrations].”

Eggers said Democrats and left-wing organizations funded by globalist billionaire George Soros fight “at every turn to keep any effort to increase [voter] security,” which he said, “includes leveling the charges of racism anytime a state wants to do anything” about combatting voter fraud.

In exclusive Breitbart News interviews, Eggers said the “Democratic Party political machine is built in part on the reliance of illegal votes cast by demographics that vote reliably for Democrats.”

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that election fraud is a very big problem and the left relies on this to have any shot of maintaining power in Congress.  There are just over 3,100 counties in America, which puts this figure at approximately 8% of all counties in the country.  That’s almost 10% of the country’s counties where fraud is much more possible and likely to happen.  It only takes maybe swaying 5% of the country to change an election.

It’s clear the left does not take voter fraud seriously, and indeed relies on it.  It’s also apparent that they do not take the Russia threat actually seriously or they would be screaming from the hilltops that we need voter ID to stop the problem.  The reality is voter ID would destroy their party.  This problem of more registered voters than voters possible would be put to bed immediately with voter ID requirements and a re-registering requirement perhaps every 2 years or so to ensure nobody who is ineligible, dead, or moved from being able to vote (or have someone fraudulently vote in their place).  That should also wipe away other fuckery like having 170 116-year olds in one county.

President Trump is obviously aware of this issue and has pushed for voter reform before.  I have to think he has some kind of checks in waiting to help with any potential fraud knowing what he knows about how the Cabal operates.

11 yr old hacks replica election office website in 10 minutes

The website r00tz.org put on a challenge this weekend to hack a replica of the election office website.  An 11-yr old girl was able to hack it in 10 minutes.  r00tz.org is “A place where kids learn white-hat hacking to better the world”.  Gives you a nice warm fuzzy feeling inside that it can be hacked that easily, right?

The election security budget for 2018 was $380 million dollars.  It should give one pause when a little girl can hack an election website that could be in a swing state in 10 minutes.

The takeaway message is clear.  Ensuring a high level of election security is very hard.  Electronic voting, while no doubt easier to tally votes, is also several levels of magnitude harder to defend against cyber threats, both from without and within.  As if a Soros voting machine gave one a warm fuzzy feeling to begin with.

No.  Go back to paper ballots and require voter ID.  The Democrats are caught.  You can’t whinge on about MUH RUSSIA on the one hand and cry that voter ID is racist because reasons on the other and expect us to allow these contradicting views to continue.  Use it against them.  If Russia truly is as dangerous in election meddling as you’ve been crying about for over two years now, then buckle down and eliminate that chance with paper ballots and voter ID.  That’s it.

The mid-term elections are right around the corner and there will inevitably be some foul play afoot.  Consider even now the special election in Ohio last week.  This article from Breitbart goes into detail how Soros has tried to obstruct attempts of improving election security.  Sorry, but I have a hard time believing there are 170 registered voters in just ONE Ohio district over 116 YEARS OLD.  Are there even 170 116 year olds in all of America?  Something tells me those 116 year olds weren’t voting Republican.

Nunes suggests paper ballots

Rep. Devin Nunes recently suggested banning electronic voting systems due to security concerns.  Via The Washington Times:

“The one thing we’ve been warning about for many, many years on the intelligence committee is about the electronic voting systems. Those are really dangerous in my opinion, and should not be used,” Mr. Nunes, California Republican, said in an interview aired Thursday on Hill.TV’s “Rising.”

“I think anybody that does that, and that’s communicating over the web, it’s going to be a challenge. So you have to make sure that you limit that as much as possible, and we need a paper trail so that you can go back in case you have to do a manual recount,” Mr. Nunes added.

The congressman suggested banning electronic voting systems in response to a question raised concerning the state of election security, and particularly whether the November 2018 midterms will be able to withstand any potential interference on par with efforts waged during the 2016 U.S. presidential race.

It’s safe to assume Rep. Nunes has more information than we have to deal with regarding election security.  He knows the hacking attempts and the voter fraud that’s occurred in the past election.  And I’m sure it’s much worse and much more rampant than the traitorous MSM has let on.  But not from Russia.  Lax voter ID laws I’m sure have led to massive amounts of illegals voting and being completely covered up.  It’s a great idea and I think ultimately is a major backfire against the Democrats.  All the hysteria they’ve drummed up about Russia meddling with our election yet their constant screaming that voter ID would be racist somehow to certain groups of people puts them in a real bind.  You can’t tighten up voter security without hurting a constituent that would be voting heavily in favor of the left.  Paper ballots greatly reduce a lot of security risks and also I’m sure makes it much harder to commit election fraud on a broad scale.

You make the bed you sleep in

Dough Schoen of Fox News has released this piece about how the Democrats are divided within the party in what could spell disaster in the upcoming elections.  From the article:

The lack of consensus between the two factions of the Democratic Party is clear, unambiguous and startling.

The progressive agenda focuses primarily on resisting President Trump at every step, labeling his every action a scandal, and calling for his impeachment without any vetted or verifiable evidence of wrongdoing. Progressives also advocate a redistribution of wealth without any long-term plan to fund policies such as Medicare-for-All or guaranteed employment.

The moderates offer a distinctly different worldview. They offer a plan for inclusive economic growth and an alternative set of policies to resolve the issues surrounding immigration and health care. At the same time, they reject party-line loyalty to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and calls for President Trump’s impeachment.

It was clear to anybody with half a brain and an objective viewpoint to see this was inevitable.  Identity politics has been the name of the game for the Dems for quite some time now.  And they assumed that all these wildly different groups of people would somehow miraculously get along and sing kumbaya together and live in harmony.  Free shit for everybody is another constant, and of course the impeachment of President Trump.

The cognitive dissonance is fascinating to watch.  The better the economy gets, the lower the unemployment, having more money in everyone’s pockets, contrasted with constant screaming and “outrage” from the other side really is a thing to behold.  The left has no platform for this coming mid-terms.  What exactly are they going to run on?  The country is objectively stronger, richer, and more prosperous under President Trump.

It was only a matter of time before the Socialists and Communists clashed with the moderate left.  And it couldn’t happen to a worse group of people.  The constant division they pushed within this country, especially during the past 10 years, has set this country back decades.  An absolute bloodbath in the coming mid-terms would be the best thing for this country.  Hopefully, some day, this will pave for way for a 3rd party.  The Republicans aren’t much better, and in some ways worse from a traitorous standpoint, than the Dems.  Strong Libertarian candidates would be the eventual ideal.  Perhaps, after this bloodbath, and a continued purging of the Cabal by our heroic President, the way will be paved for more than two shitty options in the future.

The Democratic leadership can and should achieve a compromise with President Trump and the Republicans on providing necessary funding to secure the Southern border and also create a pathway to citizenship for individuals who illegally entered the United States through no fault of their own, and since that time have contributed greatly to the American economy and our society.

I really don’t think Mr Schoen realizes that this will never happen.  The feral left needs open borders to have any chance of succeeding in the future. Their platform simply isn’t sustainable any other way.  They do not care about American citizens.  The drugs and human trafficking coming over the border, much as they can pretend they want to stop it, is essential for their survival.  Mass immigration still remains the biggest issue that needs addressing.  Our country cannot survive in its current state.

Illegals given right to vote in San Francisco

More head scratching, treasonous news out of San Francisco.  Via ABC7:

Monday the Department of Elections Issued Voter Registration Forms for non-citizens who are eligible to vote for members of the San Francisco Board of Education in the November 6th 2018 election. The measure passed in 2016 with a close vote of 54 percent to 46 percent following two failed previous attempts.

San Francisco is the first city in the state to allow non-citizens to vote in local elections.

“As a parent myself and a former member of the SF Board of Education it is critical that the voices of all parents are at the table particularly those that have historically been denied a voice in the process,” said Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer who represents District 1.

One of the sacred privileges and duties of citizens is the right to vote.  As with all things involving illegals, the left will try to rationalize this away or make it sound small.  “It’s just local education elections.”  It’s non-stop creep.  Local school elections today.  Mayor tomorrow.  Governor the next day.  President next month.

Sorry, Sandra.  There’s a reason these people have historically been denied a voice.  When you commit a crime of this magnitude, generally you do not deserve, and most definitely do not have the RIGHT, to exercise these kinds of liberties.  The level of either sheer stupidity or naivety is truly mind boggling.  Or they are legitimately traitors looking to destroy this nation.  Either way it needs to stop.  Do they really think this will end well for the natives?  Those who built this country?  What a sweet deal these people have.  Not paying their fair share of taxes, shouldering none of the burden of paying for health care, defending the country in wars, or any other of our duties, all the while reaping the benefits of our schools, hospitals, and it’s even looking like they’ll be able to choose who runs the country too.

Think about the ridiculous direction this is going.  Illegals, people who by definition do not belong here, can now vote, and some day will likely be able to vote for their own into office.  It’s already happening.  Legitimately there may be a day where illegals will run the country, voted in by their own.

New Hampshire Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of voter residency bill

Another potential area for Democrat abuse has been somewhat settled.  Via the Concord Monitor:

Currently, people voting in New Hampshire need only demonstrate that they are domiciled in the state, a status that requires voters count New Hampshire as their place of residence “more than any other place,” but which doesn’t carry the requirements of residency. HB 1264 would merge the definitions of “residency” and “domicile” in New Hampshire law, effectively making anyone who casts a ballot in an election a de facto resident.

Republican supporters of the bill have called the move a common-sense change that brings New Hampshire in line with 49 other states that require residency to vote. But Democrats and voting rights groups have attacked the bill as a voter suppression technique aimed at college students, arguing that the resulting requirement for voters to obtain New Hampshire driver’s licenses and car registrations amounts to a “poll tax.”

As most people know, New Hampshire features prominently in the primaries because they are the first primary.  The momentum that comes out of these very early elections can be the catalyst to propel candidates forward, or if they poll very low kill their election dreams before they really start.

This is a pretty significant ruling as New Hampshire gets a lot of attention early on and is a swing state.  A complaint some residents of New Hampshire have is the influence of ultra liberal Massachusetts.  Closing this loophole and putting New Hampshire in line with the rest of the country should help alleviate this a little bit.