This is what your kids are learning in school

More indoctrination in the schools that I’m sure parents have zero idea about.  This is from the heart of the Western suicide movement, the UK.  In this episode, 6-year olds are being taught about gay marriage.  Here, the students are told they are Prince Henry, and they are to write a love letter to their servant, Thomas, about why it would be a “brilliant” idea for Thomas to marry him.  Watch the video for yourself here.

gender1

Most people in this country are of the mindset that anyone can do whatever they want that makes them happy so long as it’s not impinging on the happiness or freedoms of anyone else.  “Do not do to others what you wouldn’t want done to you” is something most people can agree with.  That said, I think most reasonable people would ALSO agree that it’s probably not healthy or normal or right to be indoctrinating kids in this way at such a young age when their minds are so malleable.  Make no mistake that’s what they are doing, indoctrinating these children.  I have no doubt the teacher thinks she is doing admirable, honorable work.  But the reality is what you’re doing is confusing children at a young age about what’s normal.  Yes, normal.  If they really wanted to teach inclusivity you could teach this story without forcing the child to assume the role of a homosexual.  You could just say “some people prefer people of the same sex” and leave it at that.  What they’re doing is deeper and darker.

gender2

If you don’t think they’re trying to indoctrinate the children read the screen captures posted from the video.  No boy or girl uniforms, again along the mindset of gender fluidity and “be whatever you want to be”.  All ages are forced to take part in these lessons.  I just have a hard time believing LGBT lessons are an essential part of a child’s curriculum at that juncture of their life.  Literally anything else from a classical education would be preferable to this.  Though something tells me these kids won’t be taught Shakespeare because he was part of the patriarchy or something.

If you’ve wondered why it feels like the times are more frenzied now, or that people are losing their minds, it’s because it’s true.  The communists took control of our education system a generation or two ago and we’re seeing the fruits of their labor.  College campuses were at the heart of all the social justice warrior nonsense that has sprung up.  It came to a head in 2014 and has only gotten worse now.  You think it’ll stop at LGBT?  Wait until they normalize pedophilia.  If you don’t think they’ll try and teach how it’s okay in some cases for a child to have a sexual relationship with an adult you haven’t been paying attention for the past few years.

 

California forces boards to have women members

California continues its crusade to social engineer.  In their latest battle nobody asked for, they are now making it a requirement to have at least one board member that is female by the end of 2019.  Via Reuters:

The law would mandate at least two female directors by the end of 2021 if the company has five directors and three women if the company has six or more directors. Violators face fines of at least $100,000 and up to $300,000 for multiple violations of the statute.

“Given all the special privileges that corporations have enjoyed for so long, it’s high time corporate boards include the people who constitute more than half the ‘persons’ in America,” California Governor Jerry Brown said in a statement announcing the bill’s signing.

Silicon Valley tech companies started disclosing workforce diversity figures in 2014, but progress at the top has been slow, underscoring the challenge of transforming cultures that critics say are too homogenous, white and male dominated.

Yes, the ever dangerous and terrible position of having a board that’s too white and male dominated in a country that was founded and cultivated largely by white males.  Definitely can’t have that!

They aren’t even trying to hide it anymore.  They want to replace white men.  Period.  Not that is has to be said, but deliberately placing arbitrary quotas that have nothing to do with job performance or logic is a dangerous precedent, and ultimately fruitless and destructive.  And why is this only a problem in corporate board rooms?  I notice a rather large absence of diversity of NBA basketball teams.  Should we place quotas to require more white people on NBA teams?  After all, they are not proportionally represented on a NBA roster as compared to their proportion of the population.

No, of course that would never happen.  Nor should it.  The free market, or what small idea of the free market we think we have is, only works when it’s allowed to run naturally.  Which means allowing companies to hire whomever they want and put whomever they want on their boards.  If women feel so slighted, here’s an idea, how about start more companies?  Yes, I know, patriarchy.  Privilege.  Victim mindset.

This will not end at corporate board rooms, nor will it end with just a quota for women on corporate boards.  Eventually boards will need to be 20, 50, 100 people large to accomodate all of the requirements to have x amount of women, x amount of Native Americans, x amount of African-Americans, etc etc etc.  Micro-managing into oblivion.