About that school shooter…

People wouldn’t hate the mainstream media so much if they simply presented the news in as unbiased a fashion as possible.  Every single school shooting we get the “ban guns” narrative shoved down our throats.  Anyone with a morsel of honesty in their bones knows that guns aren’t the problem.  You know what wasn’t really reported on in the MSM for the newest Colorado shooting?  One of the shooters was trans.  Both were very left-leaning.  Devon posted anti-Trump and anti-Christian posts, and praised Obama.  At least one of them came from a single parent household.  A little more about Maya McKinney.  Sorry, Alec McKinney.

Online postings apparently made by the younger suspect in the Colorado charter school shooting paint a conflicting picture — one of an average teen who likes hanging out with his friends, and another that shows a tortured kid who experimented with drugs, detested his classmates and was struggling to fit in.

Maya McKinney, a 16-year-old who’s undergoing a female-to-male transition and who goes by Alec, and Devon Erickson, 18, are accused of entering STEM School Highland Ranch outside Denver on Tuesday with two handguns that authorities say they used to kill one of their classmates and injure eight others.

And further down:

Another message he retweeted in November pointed to a possible mental health issue with the statement: “depression loves to seal everything I love.”

KoolCid1992 also tweeted about his mom and how she’s handled changes in his behavior.

“*my mom talking to me about how she hates the new alec*,” the tweet begins.

“Mom: I miss my Alec can you find him for me

Me: I miss my dad can you find him for me 🤠 yeeeehaw gotem.”

Finally, on April 29, just over a week before the shooting, he wrote an ominous tweet.

“When you’re putting yourself in life threatening danger 😘,” the suspect wrote, with no further explanation.

Screen Shot 2019-05-10 at 8.43.07 AM.png

But no, it’s the gun’s fault.  Always the guns.

Both of these teens were clearly very troubled.  Here in clown world, where values are inverted and morals are perverted, these shootings become less surprising every day.  The MSM winds these people up with their lies and sensationalism.  All sorts of bad behavior are normalized and praised.  This is what happens in a society devoid of any moral compass.

It has been talked about before, just not in the mainstream media, but the one rather consistent commonality between all of these shooters is that nearly all of them come from a single parent household, notably ones in which the father was absent.

As noted by University of Virginia Professor Brad Wilcox in 2013, “nearly every shooting over the last year in Wikipedia’s ‘list of U.S. school attacks’ involved a young man whose parents divorced or never married in the first place.” Additionally, a study on older male shooters found similar connections to growing up fatherless.

Writing at The Federalist in 2015, Peter Hasson highlighted the fact that of all the shootings on CNN’s “27 Deadliest Mass Shootings In U.S. History” list committed by young males since 2005, only one was raised by his biological father.

The most recent Florida school shooter, too, had no father figure, as his adoptive father died when the suspect was just a boy.

Hasson also distilled the jarring corelation between fatherless homes and general male violence:

Violence? There’s a direct correlation between fatherless children and teen violence. Suicide? Fatherless children are more than twice as likely to commit suicide. Dropping out of school? Seventy-one percent of high school dropouts came from a fatherless background. Drug use? According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Fatherless children are at a dramatically greater risk of drug and alcohol abuse.” How about guns? Two of the strongest correlations with gun homicides are growing up in a fatherless household and dropping out of school, which itself is directly related to lack of an active or present father.

This clear connection is being lazily and intentionally addressed by the Left — if at all— as more evidence to further squash masculinity, which they’ve deemed “toxic.” (Admitting the importance of the nuclear family and depriving feminists of their “go, girl!” salutes is apparently a bridge too far.)

Mental health issues and broken families are much more likely causes to the shooting than guns.  Why can’t that be honestly discussed?  We all know the reason why, but that’s the question the average American should be asking themselves.  Mainstream news is not to keep people informed, it is to shape their minds.  If people looked at who owned these outlets, and considered for a moment that just maybe these people had their own objectives in mind beyond reporting the news, we might actually get somewhere.

Look beyond the narrative

I am willing to bet most of you did not hear about the attack two weeks ago where at least 32 Christians were slaughtered in a village in Nigeria, along with having at least one of their churches burned to the ground and a hundred more displaced, by a Muslim group.

At least 32 Christians were killed by suspected Fulani extremists in Nigeria Tuesday, sources told a leading Christian persecution monitoring group.

The early-morning attack occurred in the district of Maro in the Kaduna state of north-central Nigeria, according to reports. In addition to the loss of life, homes and at least one church were burned as hundreds were displaced. Some homes even reportedly had sleeping residents inside when they were lit on fire.

“Please pray for peace in Kaduna state — hundreds have been displaced and hundreds killed by the Fulani jihadists,” The Rev. Bakari Ibrahim, director of the ECWA’s Evangelical Missionary Society, told Morning Star News. “We evacuated about a hundred EMS kids from Kufana for safety.”

Resident Mordecai Funom Ibrahim told the persecution news outlet that about 400 armed Fulanis attacked villages around Maro around 6 a.m. Tuesday.

At the time of the attack, a group of women affiliated with the ECWA had gathered for a meeting at the local church.

“We ran out of the church building as the shooting was going on,” one of the women from the group told Morning Star News. “Many have been killed, and I have not seen my family members since morning. I have escaped out of the area.”

This was not a one time event either.  Last week 52 more Christians were killed and the death toll is over 120 since February by the same alleged Fulani militant group.

Hmmm.  A religiously motivated attack on a large group of people.  Where have I heard about this recently?

This is not meant to take anything away from the horrific New Zealand attacks of the past week.  It is merely to point out the hypocrisy in the reporting and the absolutely disgusting state we are in.  There is a lot of speculation regarding the New Zealand shooter.  Whether this really was an attack pushing back on multiculturalism, was religiously motivated, or a false flag (there is credible evidence for both) the point is the mainstream media pushed one story very hard and the other one doesn’t even get a 10 second mention on most, if any, mainstream news sites.  Why?

We know why.  One fits the narrative and their motivations, the other does not.  What better way to push gun control than having a white guy slaughter dozens of people of color?  Sure, we can even paint him as a far-right extremist.  That works.  Given the ground the deep state has ceded and their obvious desperation this would not be at all surprising if this was done themselves.  There are a lot of attacks like that recently, and we have expected them for a while now as they continue to lose a battle not being talked about publicly.  And it gives them something to point to the right and say, “See!  They’re the violent ones!  Ban guns!” while the feral left continues to ramp up the violence themselves.  A story of (brown) Muslims slaughtering Christians does not help further their objectives at all.

They also do this to paint a false picture about the amount of violence or crime a particular group does; to either disproportionately pump up and make you think one group does a lot more violence of a particular sort, or to bury stories to cover up the amount of crime done by a particular group to make it seem like it’s far less than is actually happening.  Something tells me the general public would be far more vocal about 3rd world immigration if they saw the number of religiously motivated attacks that happen on a daily basis.  Or maybe they’d reconsider the underlying problem, if they really wanted to fix the problem, if they honestly reported on the amount of violence in Chicago every day.  Instead they push stories like this, which make you think insane white dudes regularly shoot up churches with big weapons and that it’s a glaring problem that requires support on both sides to fix immediately.

The mainstream media does not actually care about the victims of the New Zealand shooting.  They just used it as a way to push their agenda.  Christians are one of if not the most persecuted groups in the Middle East but you never hear about attacks on them.  When is the last time you heard a call from the MSM to accept more Christian refugees, aside from maybe Tucker Carlson?

Illinois to introduce bill that would allow for social media background check before approval of gun purchase

Because all that gun crime in Chicago is coming from people purchasing legal firearms, right?  Via CBS Chicago:

“This is something my community is demanding action on,” said Rep. Daniel Didech (D-Buffalo Grove).

That’s why Didech is proposing gun buyers reveal their public social media accounts to Illinois police before they’re approved for a firearm license.

“A lot of people who are having mental health issues will often post on their social media pages that they’re about to hurt themselves or others,” Didech said. “We need to give those people the help they need.”

Pro-gun groups are outraged.

“When people look at this everyone who has a Facebook account or email account or Twitter account will be incensed or should be,” said Richard Pearson with the Illinois State Rifle Association.

Either the community is really stupid or Didech is just saying that to push his gun control agenda.  Clearly the shootings in Chicago are not coming from law abiding citizens purchasing firearms legally.  Even Joe Scarborough realizes that the vast majority of shootings stem from firearms purchased illegally.  Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, and yet every week dozens of people are shot.  Heyjackass.com is a great site to keep track of Chicago’s shootings.

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.13 AM

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.38 AM.png

Something tells me whoever is making this determination of who is fit or not to purchase based on their social media in an ultra-liberal city like Chicago will probably preferentially penalize Trump supporters or anyone who has thoughts contrary to the narrative.  It is usually the SJWs who like to patrol for thoughtcrimes.

Many people will point to some of the school shootings and what was said on social media before them.  As if those guns are procured legally by the kids doing the crimes, or like that is the type of shooting that is common in Chicago.  It is not a stretch to think that parents may be prohibited from purchasing firearms if their kids post something edgy on social media.  After all, the kid could steal the gun and kill kids in school, amiright?  Whatever excuse they can come up with to take guns away from citizens.  They have no shame.

IMG_2915.JPG

FBI finds no motive in Vegas shooting. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Our trustworthy FBI has let us know that there is no specific motive in the deadliest shooting in modern American history.  So, just like, forget about it guys.  Move along.  Via Breitbart:

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A high-stakes gambler who rained a hail of gunfire down on a crowd of country music fans, killing 58, took any specific motive for the 2017 attack to his grave, the FBI said Tuesday as it concluded the investigation into the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

The agency found no “single or clear motivating factor” to explain why Stephen Paddock carried out the attack from his suite in a high-rise casino hotel. The 64-year-old fatally shot himself as police closed in.

“It wasn’t about MGM, Mandalay Bay or a specific casino or venue,” Aaron Rouse, the agent in charge of the FBI’s Las Vegas office, told The Associated Press. “It was all about doing the maximum amount of damage and him obtaining some form of infamy.”

The finding was contained in a long-awaited report compiled by the FBI’s Behavior Analysis Unit, a group of experts who spent months examining several factors that might have led to the rampage.

“This report comes as close to understanding the why as we’re ever going to get,” Rouse said.

Let me rephrase that last part for you.  This report comes as close as we want you, the American public, to understanding the why as we’re ever going to allow you to get.

They either really do take us as total suckers or they’re just scrambling at this point because they’ve needed to cover stuff up at a frenetic pace since President Trump took office and started shaking things up.  To be clear: this is a total FBI coverup.  They know exactly the motive, exactly who was involved, exactly why it happened.  It seems really strange that in Las Vegas, literally probably the most video taped city on Earth, there is no footage available?  Or how about the fact that a lot of people witnessed a second gunman?  Or the entire storyline regarding the Saudi prince and the floors right above the shooter’s floor?  I almost linked to the above theories but every link has YouTube videos that have been removed.  Probably just a coincidence.

They are covering up something they do not want us to see or ask about.  This is where we our with some of our alphabet institutions in the United States now.  This is why we’ve elected President Trump to drain the swamp and eliminate the rot.  The FBI seems to be rotten to the core.  I have no doubt there are many hard working patriots still there, but it has been completely infested with traitors from the top on down.  Much like the JFK assassination, 9/11, WACO, etc, you will likely never get the full picture of what really happened.  They’ve been at this gig a long time.

PS – Not saying this is the case, but would it shock you if this was a false flag to push gun control more?  The fact I can ask that question without immediately being laughed out of the room tells you how far we’ve fallen as a country for that to even be a potential consideration.

Now they can take your firearms on hearsay

Via a Fox News article earlier this week:

A middle school student in Vermont helped avert a possible school shooting after overhearing two classmates discussing bringing guns to campus, police say.

Investigators said a concerned parent from Middlebury Union Middle School called police on Saturday to inform them their child had expressed concern “over some conversation this student was privy to, where there was talk about using firearms to harm people in school.”

Middlebury Police Chief Tom Hanley told the Addison Independent on Tuesday that police and school officials immediately launched a probe into the allegation over the weekend.

“By early Monday, we had identified two people, one of whom had made a specific threat against a specific person in the school, with a date and time on when this was going to happen,” he told the newspaper.

He said the two 14-year-old students were planning to get guns from a relative and bring them to school on Tuesday.

“You had one juvenile making a very specific threat, another juvenile who was going to provide the guns for him to carry it out,” Hanley said. “There are relationship issues between all the people involved. We’re still getting through a lot of that.”

Prosecutors got an Extreme Risk Order and seized the guns from the relative’s home and police got the Vermont Department for Children & Families involved.

Hanley said more than 10 weapons were confiscated from the home, largely consisting of hunting rifles and handguns. He told the Independent he doesn’t believe any semi-automatic assault rifles or shotguns were among the confiscated weapons.

To recap:  student allegedly overhears two other students talking.  Student A wants to do harm to another student, C.  Student B is to get the firearms from a relative.

That alone appears to be all that was needed to confiscate this person’s firearms.  The relative, who had NOTHING to do with the entire incident, is now without firearms for who knows how long.

This story will be touted as a great example of “see something, say something” and as a crisis averted.  But the real story is how easy it is to take away someone’s firearms under totally unconstitutional grounds.  Again, the relative had nothing to do with the situation and unless the story is leaving something out posed no risk themselves to the threatened student in question.  Think about how dangerous a precedent this says.  There was no proof provided that what the initial student was even saying was an actual true story.  Does this mean I can allege I overheard a relative of Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi supposedly threaten someone with their guns and have their guns taken away?  Is this all it takes?

Obviously there is room to abuse this to disarm people.  It is not an overreaction to think that, especially given how under attack our second amendment rights are.

Black Facts Matter

Jerome Hudson wrote an excellent piece on Breitbart about black crime statistics.  It should be an eye-opener for those not paying attention and runs totally counter to what the MSM wants you to believe, mainly that white cops are racist and white people are out to get black people all the time, as if they had nothing better to do.  Five facts from the article:

FACT 1. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968.

According to FBI data, 4,906 black people murdered other blacks in 2010 and 2011. That is 1,460 more black Americans killed by other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968, according to the Tuskegee Institute.

FACT 2. Black People (mostly men) commit a grossly disproportionate amount of crime.

In 2012, white males were 38 percent of the population and committed 4,582 murders. That same year, black males were just 6.6 percent of the population but committed a staggering 5,531 murders.

In other words: black people–at just a fifth of the size–committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts.

The figures above highlight a horrific truth that black racialists and white liberals routinely ignore: Lawbreaking black Americans, young black males particularly, put themselves in close proximity to (mostly white male) police officers at rates sometimes five to 10 times higher than whites. This is a recipe for disaster. Thusly….

FACT 3. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years.

DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, black people committed 52% of homicides.

In 2013, black criminals committed 38% of the murders. Whites accounted for just 31 percent.

There are five times fewer black people than white people in America and, yet, they consistently carry out a larger share of the crimes? Given this rate, it’s no wonder that there aren’t more assistances where cops kill black criminals.

FACT 4. Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined.

There have been almost as many deaths in one American city as there have been in the two major wars carried out by the U.S. military this century.

Chicago’s death toll from 2001November, 26 2015 stands at 7,401. The combined total deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2015: 4,815) and Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan (2001-2015: 3,506), total 8,321.

FACT 5. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone.

University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest crime data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports and Centers for Disease Control and found that an average of 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012.

Professor Johnson’s research further concluded that 112 black men died from both justified and unjustified police-involved killings annually during this same period.

Black Lives Matter does not care about black people.  If they truly did you’d hear more about programs to end black on black violence.  Instead they only ever come out of the woodwork when there’s an altercation between a white cop and black man.  As the article points out, the rare white-cop-killing-black-man shouldn’t be surprising given the amount of times a cop is needed for a crime committed by a black man.  It has nothing to do with racism.  The recent onslaught of bodycam footage only confirms this.

And as with most causes the left supports these days, their motives are often hidden by superficial fronts of “equality” or “justice” or something of the sort.  The left pushes racism in this regard to further an agenda, much like they push school shootings to try and push gun control, when in reality the facts pretty much always discredit what they are saying.

This is why so many hold so much disdain for the mainstream media.  They push lies that are utterly destructive and divisive.  It’s why many think they are an enemy of the state, and rightfully so.  Mainstream journalism seems to have died years ago.  And when 6 companies control 90% of the media in America it used to be easy to set and control the narrative.  This has changed a bit in the past few years as alternative media has had a meteoric rise and chipped away at the credibility of the CNNs of the world.  Imagine if mainstream media actually worked to publish facts as they came up, not based on a narrative, but just to actually report the news as it happened.  The fact that sentence even needs to be typed out tells you all you need to know about the state we’re in.

Louisiana AG deny $600 million deal to BoA, Citibank over gun control

Louisiana firing shots across the bow!  Via Breitbart:

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and the state’s Bond Commission denied $600 million to Citibank and Bank of America over the gun control stance adopted by both companies.

Citibank and Bank of America were both to be part of a road financing plan in the state, but were omitted from the financial plan after arbitrarily placing new gun controls on banking customers.

Louisiana Executive Division press secretary Ruth Wisher told Breitbart News that Landry and State Treasurer John Schroder have been working on the state’s response to corporate gun control “for some time.” Omitting them from the $600 million is part of that response.

On March 23, 2018, Breitbart News reported Citibank’s new gun control regulations, which require gun store customers to quit selling “high capacity” magazines in order to do business with the bank. Citibank also demanded bank store customers refuse long gun sales to anyone 18-20 years old, even though long gun sales to 18-20-year-olds are legal (and 18-20-year-olds can use fully automatic weapons in the U.S. military).

On April 13, 2018, Reuters reported that Bank of America was reworking their policy so as to end with customers “who make military-style firearms for civilians”  Bank of America does not differentiate between the fact that military rifles are fully automatic, whereas civilian firearms are only semiautomatic.

I will never understand why large corporations with customers on both sides of a topic will alienate 50% of their clientele.  It’s probably a huge misread by their marketing departments thinking their virtue signaling will do them some good.  The reality is most customers don’t want the damn companies they’re buying products from to display any political opinion whatsoever.  This will only get them into trouble.

It’s sad how blind the left is to their own bullying and discriminatory tactics.  “All are welcome” so long as you agree with exactly everything they say.  They’ve done this before.  Last year Harvard had a commencement just for black students.  Willful segregation.  And I’m actually all for it; freedom of association.  I just want the response to be the same and just as accepted if ever the alternative were to occur.  Though I’m sure the response would not be the same.

It’s not hard to imagine a world where there’s one set of stores for conservatives and another for liberals at this pace.  That’s really what it appears that they want by having banks preferentially choosing which customers to serve.  The only option will be to have conservative only banks that do allow you to buy guns.  It’s nice to see Louisiana taking a hard stance on this subject.  The only way corporations will bend and change their ways is if they feel it in the wallet.  That’s the only pressure they will ever bow to.

Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signs gun seizure bill

RINO Charlie Baker has signed a bill for temporary gun confiscation with no due process.  Via Daily Caller:

Republican Gov. Charlie Baker signed a bill on Tuesday allowing for temporary gun confiscation without any due process in Massachusetts.

Bill H4670 enables the police, a family or household member, including roommates, relatives or significant others, to remove firearms, firearm identification cards and ammunition from any individual deemed to be a danger to oneself or others.

Surrendered goods can be confiscated for up to one year, with the ability to renew the order, but an individual can try to appeal the ruling.

In a time where there has been increased violence and threats to conservatives, for an alleged conservative to sign this bill is an absolute affront to our personal liberties.  The feral left has ramped up their attacks significantly since traitor Maxine Waters called for increased harassment to President Trump’s officials is unforgivable.  Consider for a second the fact that now in Boston you could have a feral SJW roommate, and on a whim she could decide to come into your room and take your gun away because her sick beliefs make it feel warranted.  Maybe she feels her safe space has been invaded.  You then have  to fight in court for potentially years to get it back.  Absolutely insane.  The second amendment has been rigorously attacked for decades now.  A new Supreme Court Justice needs to be appointed quickly, and they should repeal every law that chips away at our 2A rights.  It’s gone way too far.  Even mental background checks, do you feel like you can fully trust a professional’s opinion anymore?  What if that professional is a devout leftist and SJW?  Do you really think they could judge the situation dispassionately and objectively?  Neither do I.

The Kennedy retirement should bode well for 2A preservation

There are a lot of issues to discuss regarding Justice Kennedy’s upcoming retirement, which we will over the course of the next few weeks.  Justice Kennedy was a moderate conservative and often times the swing vote in very close cases, including those for gay rights and abortion.  With him gone, many on the feral left are freaking out.  Another area, which has been largely ignored by the Supreme Court in general, is the issue of gun control.  Via the Huffington Post:

There has been a lot of speculation about why the five court conservatives, including Kennedy, have not reviewed any of the lower court cases upholding various gun restrictions. The most common theory is that neither the four conservatives other than Kennedy, nor the four liberals, knew how Kennedy was going to vote.

Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor, and author of one of the most important books ever written on the Second Amendment, Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in Americaspeculated in 2014 that among the other justices that “there must be some concern about the way Kennedy is going to go” in future gun cases. Well, that concern is now moot.

And:

The Supreme Court has only ruled in favor of an individual right to own guns in two decisions, and in neither one did Kennedy write his own opinion. He did, however, make up one of the five votes in both 2008’s D.C. v. Heller, and 2010’s McDonald v. City of Chicago. Both cases invalidated complete bans on possessing handguns in each city. The Supreme Court has not, however, returned to the Second Amendment since McDonald was decided, despite thousands of lower court cases wrestling with the balance between the right to keep and bear arms and public safety.

So it looks like he begrudgingly upheld 2A in two cases, didn’t write an opinion piece on either, and the Supreme Court was afraid to review anymore 2A cases because they weren’t sure how he would vote.  This is all a moot point now with him gone.  President Trump will surely nominate someone much more conservative and pro 2A.  And with the changes to how one can be nominated by a simple majority rather than 60 votes, so long as President Trump nominates before any potential changes at the mid-term elections he should be able to get in whomever he wants.

This bodes well for America.  Pro-Western men need to constantly remind themselves that we are dealing with children on the left.  You need to drag them kicking and screaming to truth and what is right.  Treat them how you would treat your children.  You wouldn’t let your children stay up all hours of the night and eat candy just because they wanted to.  No.  The same goes here.  Even though they will not like it, the changes we are trying to make will benefit them just as much as they benefit us.

This is another reason I abhor “never-Trumpers” like little Ben Shapiro.  Supreme Court Justice nomination was the most important election issue of all, with immigration reform a close second.  With President Trump’s nomination this will cement a majority conservative Supreme Court for decades to come.  Especially considering one or two other leftist Justices will likely be retiring soon, it is game over at the Supreme Court level for some time.  And that is great for everyone.

%d bloggers like this: