Uniparty passes bill to end border national emergency

This is what I’m talking about with how deep the rot is.  Republicans are no better than Democrats.  They are all the same.  A nice analogy I’ve heard is that the Republicans are the Washington Generals playing the Globetrotters.  They are controlled opposition.  President Trump will now have to veto this to keep the national emergency at the border.

The Senate passed a resolution on Thursday that would end President Donald Trump’s national emergency on the border with less than a veto-proof majority; however, the president has already threatened to veto the legislation.

The Senate passed on a resolution Thursday, 59-41, that would end President Donald Trump’s national emergency. The vote featured strong Democrat support for the bill and a surprising amount of Republicans voting for it. The House passed its version of the resolution in February with the help of 13 Republicans.

Several Senate Republicans voted against President Trump’s national emergency..

Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Mike Lee (R-UT), Rand Paul (R-KY), Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Pat Toomey (R-PA), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Rob Portman (R-OH), Roger Wicker (R-MS), Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Roy Blunt (R-MO) voted in favor of eliminating Trump’s national emergency, which would make it harder to secure America’s southern border.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who previously signaled he would vote to end the emergency, said he will back Trump’s emergency after Trump said he will work with Republicans on a president’s national emergency authority. Tillis is up for re-election in 2020.

Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO), Mike Braun (R-IN), Richard Shelby (R-AL), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Joni Ernst (R-IA), and Pat Roberts (R-KS) voted in favor of the national emergency.

Conservatives conserve nothing.  They just forfeit more and more territory.  Spineless.  Hopefully this is the last nail in the coffin for anyone thinking anybody in Congress is working for them.  Of all the BS national emergencies put forth by clowns like Obama or Bush, the one that they strike down is one protecting our own border.  If tens of thousands of illegals trying to cross our border (read: invade) every month isn’t a national emergency then I don’t know what is.

The rot runs so deep you need to blow up the whole system.  It seems the best way to fix it at this point is appoint Trump as some kind of dictator.  Seriously.  He can’t do anything with Congress.  They block him every single time.  And if they don’t the courts do.  There is no way off this ride.

Fake Americans

I am really interested to see how the 2020 elections turn out if there is no voter ID put into place or if the rampant fraud that has occurred isn’t corrected.  Because the Democrats have not put forth a platform to run on that promotes anything of value to real Americans.  And they aren’t even bothering to lie anymore to real Americans to secure their vote.  Case in point, the latest abhorrent thing they have done – rejecting a motion to recommit before the final passage of H.R.1 that condemns illegals from voting in American elections:

Democrats blocked a motion Friday to affirm that illegal aliens voting in elections “devalues” the fundamental tenets of American democracy.

The House passed H.R. 1, known as the For the People Act, which was approved along staunch party lines on Friday. Conservatives and Republicans alike derided the bill at a “voter fraud and election theft” wish list.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) sponsored a motion to recommit before the final passage of H.R. 1, to express the sense that illegal aliens’ voting in elections violates fundamental tenets of American democracy. The motion to recommit failed, with 197 votes in favor of the motion and 228 against. One-hundred-and-ninety-one Republicans voted for Crenshaw’s motion, and six Democrats voted for the amendment.

Why isn’t this more roundly condemned by followers of both parties?  Have we finally reached the point where people will blindly vote for their party regardless of their take on certain issues?  Or are people just so afraid of being called racist that they will commit demographic suicide just to not be called a racist?  We seriously cannot even agree on the fact that only American citizens should vote in American elections?

This country is hardly recognizable anymore.  We have normalized lawlessness.  We are on the way to normalizing infanticide.  We have normalized the perversions of sodomy.  We cannot even agree that there are only two genders.  President Trump cannot even get anything through to protect our borders.  And the uniparty literally wants to allow people who do not belong here and have had no fight in making this country the right to vote and change laws and elect people so suit whatever interests they have.  Insane.

Something absolutely drastic needs to happen soon.  I know the process takes a long time to make sure all the i’s are dotted and the t’s are crossed, but President Trump needs to unleash whatever sealed indictments he has.  These traitors and crooks need to be locked up and sent to Gitmo.  Drastic measures need to be taken to fix the rampant election fraud happening here and to secure the border.  The rot is likely too deep to fully save the country, but we can always hold out hope.  End immigration altogether.  We do not need it.  These are just a few of the things that MUST be done soon if there is any chance of keeping this country somewhat civil and not resorting to violence.  They are treading on very thin ice.

You cannot serve two masters.  How many people in Congress have dual citizenship?  Especially with a particular country in the Middle East?  Why is this even legal?  And where do their loyalties lie?  It really makes you wonder, as they clearly do not prioritize the needs and concerns of true Americans.  We seem to forget that these are supposed to be civil servants.  They are supposed to serve us and our needs.  If they’re not serving us, who are they serving?

Expect more of this

Not that this is entirely unheard of, but as I wrote just recently questioning whether you’d want to be tried by a jury of your peers, it works both ways.  Now it’s happening in Iowa:

The illegal alien charged with murdering 20-year-old college student Mollie Tibbetts is now requesting that jury selection for the September trial be moved to a county in Iowa with a Hispanic majority population.

In August 2018, Bahena-Rivera, an illegal alien from Mexico, was charged with Tibbetts’murder after police said he admitted to confronting and chasing down the young woman after her body was found in a cornfield in Poweshiek County, Iowa. The illegal alien lived in a region of Iowa that was surrounded by sanctuary cities, as Breitbart News noted, and worked on a dairy farm using a stolen ID and Social Security card after allegedly crossing the U.S.-Mexico border as a child.

In a motion filed by Bahena-Rivera’s attorneys and obtained by the Des Moines Register, the illegal alien requests that the jury selection be moved out of Poweshiek County — where the alleged murder took place — to a county in Iowa with a larger Hispanic population.

Set aside for the moment the fact that there is even any county with a sizable Hispanic population…in Iowa.  But if diversity is our strength and it works so well and these people have assimilated, surely it should not matter whether you are in a majority white or majority Hispanic county, right?  Aren’t we all Americans?  Except for Bahena-Rivera himself, of course, who is an illegal.  Oh wait, I’m not supposed to call him that:

The request to move jury selection to a minority-majority county is just the latest plea that Bahena-Rivera has made to the court. As Breitbart News reported, the illegal alien had initially requested that he not be called an “illegal alien” and his attorneys have said that he has a “constitutional right” to receive $5,000 in state taxpayer money to hire an independent investigative team for his defense.

According to prosecutors, Bahena-Rivera was the last person who saw Tibbetts jogging on the evening of July 18 in Brooklyn, Iowa, security camera footage reveals. That is the night Tibbetts went missing.

The illegal alien told police that Tibbetts was jogging when he saw her, according to prosecutors. That is when he said he approached Tibbetts and started talking to her. After Tibbetts told Bahena-Rivera that she would call the police if he did not stop following her, the illegal alien allegedly chased her and says he “blacked out” after this.

Police believe Bahena-Rivera stabbed Tibbetts to death, then drove to a cornfield where prosecutors say Bahena-Rivera placed corn stalks over her to hide her body. The illegal alien has been held on a $5 million bond and the murder trial is set for September.

Case closed guys.  He blacked out after he was told to leave her alone.  Much like the gun that accidentally went off in a pile of blankets in the Kate Steinle case, this guy is totally being persecuted!

Sigh.  Choose where you live wisely.  They will continue to tell you that we can all live together in harmony, but it has not been happening in this country.  When push comes to shove, and one’s back is up against the wall, they will always turn to their own.  It is natural.  Most foreigners will first identify with the nation of their racial roots, not America.  Expect to see more of these jury issues running along racial lines.  Again, you do not have these kinds of problems anywhere close to the same numbers in a country with a large racial majority of one group of people.

Only in California

Of course California would go to the courts to BRING BACK an illegal that was deported for burglary.

Deported five years ago, Veasna Meth has had to watch his family grow – and grow up – in Sacramento from nearly 8,000 miles away.

But he never lost hope.

“I knew one day I would be able to get back,” he said Thursday at San Francisco International Airport upon his return from Cambodia after he was deported in 2014.

Meth, who moved with his family to the United States when he was less than a year old and grew up in Sacramento, was deported after having served time for a residential burglary he committed when he was 19.

Further down:

“For me to get deported to a country I wasn’t born in, it’s crazy,” Meth said. “Growing up, all I thought I was, was a citizen. … Nobody ever taught me, ‘Hey if you commit a crime you’re going to get deported’ (until) it was too late.”

In 2008, when he was 19, Meth and a few friends decided to go through an open window of a house, Kim said. Meth later pleaded guilty to residential burglary and served a year-long sentence, she said.

When he was released the next year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials picked Meth up, but an immigration judge ruled that residential burglary was not a deportable offense and he was released. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, however, filed for an appeal of the decision with the Board of Immigration Appeals that was approved.

The new immigration judge determined Meth should be deported and issued the removal order in 2013. He was deported the next year.

You can always tell what side of the fence a newspaper is on by the slant they put on their stories.  Ah yes, he didn’t commit burglary, per se, it’s just that he and a few of his friends decided to go through an open window of a house.

About 1,900 Cambodians currently live in the United States with deportation orders.

Kim said these refugees often have similar stories – their families struggled financially after moving to the United States, and the children felt culturally isolated from their American peers.

“A lot of them got caught up in gang relationships” or strayed toward crime, Lo said. “For people who didn’t have much, the temptation to take from other people was higher.”

“We don’t believe in defining someone by one action they committed in their late teens, and part of it is, they fully served their sentences,” Lo said. “Everyone who commits residential burglary does their sentence and is released; the only difference is they’re not citizens.”

Like Meth, Tem said that growing up in the United States as a long-term permanent resident, he did not consider himself a non-citizen. “I thought I was normal,” Tem said. “All that rhetoric about, ‘We’re going’s to deport immigrants’ … I never thought I was an immigrant.”

Forgive me if I do not care to hear the sob story.  If anything the sob story only strengthens the case of why we need to have tighter immigration standards.  What do you think these families that are struggling to get by do when they get here?  Welfare for sure.  And yes, burglary and other crimes often times.  At best, if you can call it that, they’ll get a job under the table, not pay taxes on that money, and take away a job from an American worker.  Some of that money will probably be sent to their real home instead of injected back into the American economy too.  I guess that’s a step up from committing further crimes.  I guess.

And OF COURSE you will feel culturally isolated from your American peers when you do not speak the language and offer no skills to contribute to the country you just moved to.

The situation of many of these refugees is sad, no doubt.  But the solution is not to let hoardes of them into our country to suck off the government tit, commit crimes, and further break down any semblance of unity or American culture, whatever is left of it.  Simply put, America cannot support the entirety of the 3rd world.  It will be dragged down with it.  California is lost.  The court system is a joke and an enemy of the American people, clearly preferring non-Americans over actual citizens of this country with their continued actions to obstruct any sort of justice against those who should not be here in the first place and undoing actual justice against those who were tried and deported.  Yes, it is sad that a kid who was brought here when he was 1 had to be deported.  But ignorance to the law is no excuse.  You are not a citizen here so you really do not have a say.  And shame on your parents for putting you in that situation in the first place.  True refugees should go through the process legally, rather than abuse our laws and expect to have compassion for their careless and cavalier behavior.

Just a reminder: this is who voted against the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act”

They will want this one to disappear from the news cycle as quickly as possible.  Do not let it.  Write these senators.  More importantly, vote these monsters out when they are up for re-election.  At least three of these swamp creatures are running for president in 2020.  As a reminder, this is what they voted against:

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act”.

SEC. 2.FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) If an abortion results in the live birth of an infant, the infant is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States, and entitled to all the protections of such laws.

(2) Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.

They are literally voting to allow babies to be killed after an attempted late-term abortion.  When they are alive.  Infanticide.  Plain and simple.  It does not get any worse than this.

PostBirthAbortionNay

Illegals incarcerated at rates far higher than legal residents

If we are to truly address and fix the problem of illegal immigration we need to change the laws.  It is not compassionate, or “the right thing to do”, or any crap like that to give those entering our country illegally and committing violent crimes against our citizens the same due process as anybody else.  Try explaining to the father whose daughter was raped 3 times by an illegal why he’s only being held on a $100,000 bond.  If past experiences are any indicator, it would not be altogether surprising if he were released.

There is a particularly disturbing lie that is constantly thrown around that immigrants commit crimes at a smaller rate than legal residents.  As if that were any reason to let anyone else in.  Newsflash: the aggregate of crimes is what is important, not the rate.  Even so, I posted about this last year debunking this myth.  New data from earlier this month shows that illegal aliens commit crimes up to five times the rate of legal residents.

(February 5, 2019, Washington, D.C.) — Illegal aliens are incarcerated as much as five times the rate of legal residents – and on average three times the rate of legal residents – in states where they are most heavily concentrated, according to a new study published by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

The study analyzes the most recent illegal alien incarceration data available from the federal government’s State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP), which reimburses states for a small portion of the costs of incarcerating criminal illegal aliens. The report looks at SCAAP payments to states with large illegal alien populations and compares it to the public records of state and local prisons. The states analyzed include: Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Texas and Washington which, together, comprise the majority – 65 percent – of the nation’s illegal alien population. Importantly, the report does not include illegal aliens who have been convicted of federal criminal charges and are serving time in a Federal Bureau of Prison facility.

“This study should put to rest, once and for all, the notion that illegal aliens commit crimes at a lower rate than legal residents,” said FAIR President Dan Stein. “By focusing on states with significant illegal alien populations and that consistently report to the SCAAP program, FAIR’s study refutes this erroneous claim,” he said. “Contrary to the popular myth, this analysis shows that when applied nationally, SCAAP data from key states suggest that illegal aliens are incarcerated at three times the rate of legal residents, on average.”

You can read the full report in the link.  The problem of illegal immigration could be stopped very quickly if we really, truly, wanted to stop the problem once and for all.  One, a border wall.  Two, shoot to kill at the border anyone crossing illegally.  Three, accelerated trials for illegals.  If they are proven to be in the country illegally, then they should be deported immediately for minor offenses and punished swiftly and harshly for violent crimes like rape and murder.  I would probably prefer the death penalty over life imprisonment.

It is very simple.  If you come into this country illegally, and commit violent crimes against legal residents, you will be punished severely.  Plain and simple.  How many people do you think would need to be punished before people got the message and stopped abusing our laughable laws?  It would not be surprising at all to see illegals self-deport once the program got underway.  American citizens deserve better than what they currently receive.  The fact that we essentially shelter these monsters is horrific.

Would you want to be judged by a jury of your peers in 2019 America?

The United States is fracturing.  On the surface it appears to be mostly along political lines, but more and more it is clear that it is predominantly along racial lines.  There is a race war going on in this country, and the target is white America.  Straight, white men in particular are the group most targeted and hardest hit.  Most racial groups recognize this and form groups to vote and enact policy that best represents and helps their group.  Whites in America have been the last group to realize this or who want to play the identity politics game.  Whether it is the right thing to do or not, if they want any chance of survival they need to play the game too.  The egalitarian mindset that this country was founded on only works if the country is made up of like-minded people who actually think this way too.  As we continue to import more and more people who come from places that do not have this mindset we will only stray further from the tenets that this country was founded on.

This really is not an exaggeration.  Look at the number of hate hoaxes just within the first few weeks of 2019.  They so desperately want a group of white men to perform heinous acts in the name of racism to make Trump look bad.  The way in which grown adults treated the Covington boys is absolutely pathetic and disgraceful.  Notice that not only did they absolutely vilify a group of teenagers, but even after they were caught how many talking heads from the MSM did you hear rightly calling out the grown adult Native American?  Or how about the black supremacist group the Black Hebrew Israelites?  No.  They just went on their merry way to launch into hysterics about some other issue for the current news cycle.  No accountability.

The same goes for this poor excuse for an actor, Jussie Smollett and his abhorrent hate hoax claiming a couple of white guys, in Chicago, wearing MAGA hats, in freezing temperature, put a noose around him and poured bleach on him yelling racist and homophobic slurs.  Okay.  And look how the mainstream media took this story and ran with it before any facts came out whatsoever.  Stoking the fire.  Disgusting Ellen Page going off on her diatribe on Stephen Colbert.  Funny how many people erased tweets and thought we would forget how they vilified a group of people that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the fake attack.  In the end, it appears he hired two Nigererian brothers from the set of his show to stage the attack.  You can’t make this stuff up.

The media and the left are frothing at the mouth hoping to pounce on any one of these stories.  They want so desperately bad for these stories to be true.  Time and time again we are told that these are racist white dudes committing these heinous crimes and time and time again it is found that most of the hate hoaxes have been performed by the very same minority groups.

So I ask again – would you want to be judged by a jury of your peers in America in 2019?  Especially if you were a white man?  Perhaps, if you live in a largely homogeneous community, this may not be an issue.  But what if you live in an ultra liberal area and happen to be a conservative?  If I lived in San Francisco, arguably the ground zero cesspool of liberal ideas, it would give me pause to remain there.  Look at the trial of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, Kate Steinle’s killer.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a.k.a. Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, the illegal alien, five-time deportee, and seven-time convicted felon who killed 32-year-old American Kate Steinle in July 2015, was sentenced to time served on Friday after being convicted in November of possession of a firearm by a felon.

Zarate was acquitted of the murder and assault charges he faced, in what critics called an example of jury nullification in the politically-charged case.

Zarate was sentenced to three years in state prison, but “will be on parole for 48 months and will remain in custody to face federal charges,” according to Fox News.  Those federal charges include weapons and immigration offenses.

I wonder if the ultra liberal jury would have been as lenient on a white man who killed a black girl.  They let off a five-time deportee and seven-time convicted felon who should not have been here in the first place, essentially for political reasons and because he was a poor POC.  They let him off to TIME SERVED.

Or what if a black man plowed into a group of anti-racist protestors at a Black Lives Matter rally and killed one and injured dozens others.  Think he would get life in prison and an additional 419 years?  If he did, I do wonder if CNN or MSNBC might have their talking heads talking about how racist the sentencing is.  Claiming it was clearly not first-degree murder because he had just invited friends for lunch and had put his home address into Google maps.  In 2019 anyways that does not sound too far-fetched anyways.

In the court of public opinion, if you are a straight, white male you are guilty until proven innocent.  Recall the hysteria over the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco.  All those screeching liberals, who were quick to call the guy a gang-rapist, had nothing to lose in doing so because there are never any consequences to their actions.  You don’t read too many stories nowadays about all those concerned with Dr Ford or the other accusers still investigating to find evidence, do you?  No.  Now that he is on the Supreme Court there is no reason for them to do so because they never actually cared about any potential victim(s) in the first place.  That news cycle is over so they move on to the next issue they can screech about.

When there are no consequences to one’s actions they will continue their bad behavior.  If we do not immediately prosecute or kick out illegal immigrants they will continue to try and sneak into the country.  If we continue to let people off the hook for hate hoaxes or false accusations they will continue to accuse accuse accuse.  Some day, it could be you, or me, they may just accuse of something that cannot be proven or disproven.  The falsely accused thus far have been fortunate to have tangible evidence on their side.  But that may not be the case all the time.

Again, this country was founded on egalitarian values and Christian morals.  As both of these continue to erode it looks increasingly obvious that we are headed for civil war.  As we continue to import more people from countries that do not believe either in egalitarianism or Christian morality things like facts, logic, and evidence will become less important.  People will not judge a particular court case dispassionately based on the evidence.  Remember, immigrants are no longer trying to assimilate at all as they come here.  If we remove assimilation, and do not look at everyone living here as American but rather white, black, Hispanic, Asian, or whatever, then in-group preferences and tribalism will reign supreme.

Illinois to introduce bill that would allow for social media background check before approval of gun purchase

Because all that gun crime in Chicago is coming from people purchasing legal firearms, right?  Via CBS Chicago:

“This is something my community is demanding action on,” said Rep. Daniel Didech (D-Buffalo Grove).

That’s why Didech is proposing gun buyers reveal their public social media accounts to Illinois police before they’re approved for a firearm license.

“A lot of people who are having mental health issues will often post on their social media pages that they’re about to hurt themselves or others,” Didech said. “We need to give those people the help they need.”

Pro-gun groups are outraged.

“When people look at this everyone who has a Facebook account or email account or Twitter account will be incensed or should be,” said Richard Pearson with the Illinois State Rifle Association.

Either the community is really stupid or Didech is just saying that to push his gun control agenda.  Clearly the shootings in Chicago are not coming from law abiding citizens purchasing firearms legally.  Even Joe Scarborough realizes that the vast majority of shootings stem from firearms purchased illegally.  Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, and yet every week dozens of people are shot.  Heyjackass.com is a great site to keep track of Chicago’s shootings.

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.13 AM

Screen Shot 2019-02-08 at 8.34.38 AM.png

Something tells me whoever is making this determination of who is fit or not to purchase based on their social media in an ultra-liberal city like Chicago will probably preferentially penalize Trump supporters or anyone who has thoughts contrary to the narrative.  It is usually the SJWs who like to patrol for thoughtcrimes.

Many people will point to some of the school shootings and what was said on social media before them.  As if those guns are procured legally by the kids doing the crimes, or like that is the type of shooting that is common in Chicago.  It is not a stretch to think that parents may be prohibited from purchasing firearms if their kids post something edgy on social media.  After all, the kid could steal the gun and kill kids in school, amiright?  Whatever excuse they can come up with to take guns away from citizens.  They have no shame.

IMG_2915.JPG

End this nonsense once and for all

Via ice.gov:

SANTA ANA, Calif. – Following the arrests this morning of three defendants who allegedly operated “birth tourism” outfits that catered to Chinese clients, federal authorities today unsealed indictments that charge a total of 19 people linked to three schemes that operated across Southern California and charged clients tens of thousands of dollars to help them give birth in the United States.

The indictments charge operators and clients of three “maternity house” or “birthing house” schemes that were dismantled in March 2015 when federal agents executed 35 search warrants, which resulted from international undercover operations.

The 17 cases unsealed today contain the first-ever federal criminal charges brought against operators and customers of birth tourism businesses. The birth tourism operations not only committed widespread immigration fraud and engaged in international money laundering, they also defrauded property owners when leasing the apartments and houses used in their birth tourism schemes, according to the indictments.

These cases were investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Los Angeles. Substantial assistance was provided by IRS Criminal Investigation, as well as the Irvine Police Department and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department.

The indictments describe birth tourism schemes in which foreign nationals, mostly from China, applied for visitor visas to come to the United States and lied about the length of their trips, where they would stay, and the purposes of their trips – which were to come to the U.S. for three months to give birth so their children would receive U.S. birthright citizenship.

“America’s way of life is not for sale,” said Joseph Macias, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Los Angeles. “HSI will aggressively target those who would make a mockery of our laws and our values to benefit and enrich themselves. No one needs to be reminded about the national security and public safety implications of visa fraud and the crimes associated with it. Anyone who would exploit our nation’s generosity and our legal immigration system should be on notice – they may end up being the ones to pay a very steep price.”

And further down:

Three indictments returned Wednesday by a federal grand jury charge the operators of large birth tourism operations based in Orange, Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. Pursuant to this week’s indictments, federal authorities this morning arrested three defendants: Dongyuan Li (李冬媛), 41, of Irvine; Michael Wei Yueh Liu (刘维岳), 53, of Rancho Cucamonga; and Jing Dong (董晶), 42, of Fontana. All three are charged with conspiracy to commit immigration fraud, international money laundering and identity theft. Liu is also charged with filing three false tax returns.

As American as apple pie, right?  This shit needs to stop.  This was never how birthright citizenship was EVER supposed to be interpreted.  It is absolutely insane it ever got this far.  These firms alone have done this for thousands of babies.  It is surely in the tens or hundreds of thousands if not millions for all the other birth tourism centers they haven’t cracked down on yet.

This is how it works.  Whether they come here specifically to birth a child to have a US passport or they cross the border illegally, the result is the same.  More than 60 million people have immigrated to the United States since the disastrous Hart-Celler Act of 1965.  Along with changing the quotas of the kinds of people who could come here, it also opened the door to preferentially allowing relatives of these newcomers first, which has come to be known as chain migration.  If you include chain migration and the children of those who have come here it is around 100 million people since 1965; a rather sizable portion of the population here.

It is becoming increasingly clear that we need to stop immigration altogether if we are to keep any semblance of what we see as our country intact.  Stop both illegal and legal immigration.  Or limit legal immigration to an insanely low number like a few thousand people a year.  Increasingly they are assimilating less and less.  And clearly many do not care about our laws at all.  You think Jing Dong gives a shit about our laws or the wellbeing of our country?

We have been sold a lie.  As Lyndon Johnson famously said of the 1965 act:

This bill we sign today is not a revolutionary bill.  It does not affect the lives of millions.  It will not restructure the shape of our daily lives.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

IMG_8510.jpg

Didn’t change anything at all, huh?

As much as I love President Trump and what he has done for this country, it was a little bit worrying in his State of the Union address saying he wants more legal immigrants than ever.  God bless him, I am sure his heart is in the right place, but it is exactly the opposite of what we need right now if we want to preserve the tattered remains of this country.  But he is a civic nationalist, and strongly believes that those coming will assimilate.  This hasn’t been true for decades, if ever.  Close the birthright citizenship loopholes, tighten the laws, or end immigration altogether for the foreseeable future.  It may be the only thing that will give this country any chance of surviving.

More abortion atrocities

This time in Virginia.  A bill has been proposed there to abort up to…and after…birth.  Via freebeacon.com:

Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D.) commented Wednesday about a controversial 40-week abortion bill and in so doing said the law allows an abortion to take place after the infant’s birth.

“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.

A Democratic lawmaker in the Virginia House of Delegates proposed a bill Tuesday that would allow abortions through the end of the third trimester of pregnancy. The video of Delegate Kathy Tran presenting her bill led to an exchange where she admitted that her bill would allow for a mother to abort her child minutes before giving birth.

“How late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated that it would impair the mental health of the woman?” Majority Leader Todd Gilbert (R.) asked.

“Or physical health,” Tran said.

“Okay,” Gilbert replied. “I’m talking about the mental health.”

“I mean, through the third trimester,” Tran said. “The third trimester goes up to 40 weeks.”

“Okay, but to the end of the third trimester?” Gilbert asked.

“Yup, I don’t think we have a limit in the bill,” Tran said.

“Where it’s obvious that a woman is about to give birth, she has physical signs that she’s about to give birth, would that still be a point at which she could request an abortion if she was so certified?” Gilbert asked. “She’s dilating.”

Tran responded that is a decision between the woman and her doctor would have to make. Gilbert asked if her bill would allow an abortion right before the infant was born.

“My bill would allow that, yes,” Tran said.

And a little further down:

Northam continued by saying government shouldn’t be involved in these types of decisions and that legislators, especially male legislators, shouldn’t be telling women what to do.

“I think this was really blown out of proportion. But again we want the government not to be involved in these types of decisions. We want the decision to be made by the mothers and their providers. And this is why Julie, that legislators, most of whom are men by the way, shouldn’t be telling a woman what she should or shouldn’t be doing with her body,” Northam said.

I don’t need to be a woman to know that it’s fucking MURDER to abort a baby 10 seconds before a woman gives birth.  Lady, that is not your right.  Do these people have any compassion at all?  How utterly self-centered and morally deprived does one have to be to take the position that this is okay?  This is pure evil.

Again, as with the NY abortion law, this country may not be worth saving if this is the direction we are going to go.  I do not want to live in a country where this becomes acceptable.  We have to fight back against this.  Literally murdering children.

Are people enjoying the civilization we have now since we removed Christ from the equation?  Is this really better?  Do people really feel like we’ve hit some kind of moral nirvana, some higher level of moral consciousness, since we became a post-Christian nation?  I for one do not think allowing babies to be murdered seconds before they are born, or after they are born, is a step in the right direction.  I will post this video once again as long as the link stays up to remind people what a third trimester abortion entails.

%d bloggers like this: