About that school shooter…

People wouldn’t hate the mainstream media so much if they simply presented the news in as unbiased a fashion as possible.  Every single school shooting we get the “ban guns” narrative shoved down our throats.  Anyone with a morsel of honesty in their bones knows that guns aren’t the problem.  You know what wasn’t really reported on in the MSM for the newest Colorado shooting?  One of the shooters was trans.  Both were very left-leaning.  Devon posted anti-Trump and anti-Christian posts, and praised Obama.  At least one of them came from a single parent household.  A little more about Maya McKinney.  Sorry, Alec McKinney.

Online postings apparently made by the younger suspect in the Colorado charter school shooting paint a conflicting picture — one of an average teen who likes hanging out with his friends, and another that shows a tortured kid who experimented with drugs, detested his classmates and was struggling to fit in.

Maya McKinney, a 16-year-old who’s undergoing a female-to-male transition and who goes by Alec, and Devon Erickson, 18, are accused of entering STEM School Highland Ranch outside Denver on Tuesday with two handguns that authorities say they used to kill one of their classmates and injure eight others.

And further down:

Another message he retweeted in November pointed to a possible mental health issue with the statement: “depression loves to seal everything I love.”

KoolCid1992 also tweeted about his mom and how she’s handled changes in his behavior.

“*my mom talking to me about how she hates the new alec*,” the tweet begins.

“Mom: I miss my Alec can you find him for me

Me: I miss my dad can you find him for me 🤠 yeeeehaw gotem.”

Finally, on April 29, just over a week before the shooting, he wrote an ominous tweet.

“When you’re putting yourself in life threatening danger 😘,” the suspect wrote, with no further explanation.

Screen Shot 2019-05-10 at 8.43.07 AM.png

But no, it’s the gun’s fault.  Always the guns.

Both of these teens were clearly very troubled.  Here in clown world, where values are inverted and morals are perverted, these shootings become less surprising every day.  The MSM winds these people up with their lies and sensationalism.  All sorts of bad behavior are normalized and praised.  This is what happens in a society devoid of any moral compass.

It has been talked about before, just not in the mainstream media, but the one rather consistent commonality between all of these shooters is that nearly all of them come from a single parent household, notably ones in which the father was absent.

As noted by University of Virginia Professor Brad Wilcox in 2013, “nearly every shooting over the last year in Wikipedia’s ‘list of U.S. school attacks’ involved a young man whose parents divorced or never married in the first place.” Additionally, a study on older male shooters found similar connections to growing up fatherless.

Writing at The Federalist in 2015, Peter Hasson highlighted the fact that of all the shootings on CNN’s “27 Deadliest Mass Shootings In U.S. History” list committed by young males since 2005, only one was raised by his biological father.

The most recent Florida school shooter, too, had no father figure, as his adoptive father died when the suspect was just a boy.

Hasson also distilled the jarring corelation between fatherless homes and general male violence:

Violence? There’s a direct correlation between fatherless children and teen violence. Suicide? Fatherless children are more than twice as likely to commit suicide. Dropping out of school? Seventy-one percent of high school dropouts came from a fatherless background. Drug use? According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Fatherless children are at a dramatically greater risk of drug and alcohol abuse.” How about guns? Two of the strongest correlations with gun homicides are growing up in a fatherless household and dropping out of school, which itself is directly related to lack of an active or present father.

This clear connection is being lazily and intentionally addressed by the Left — if at all— as more evidence to further squash masculinity, which they’ve deemed “toxic.” (Admitting the importance of the nuclear family and depriving feminists of their “go, girl!” salutes is apparently a bridge too far.)

Mental health issues and broken families are much more likely causes to the shooting than guns.  Why can’t that be honestly discussed?  We all know the reason why, but that’s the question the average American should be asking themselves.  Mainstream news is not to keep people informed, it is to shape their minds.  If people looked at who owned these outlets, and considered for a moment that just maybe these people had their own objectives in mind beyond reporting the news, we might actually get somewhere.

“Americans” know hardly anything about America

A recent survey came out showing what most of us have known for some time: most Americans don’t know the first thing about America.

New research shows that while many Americans fear the First Amendment is under threat, three quarters don’t even know how many amendments make up the Bill of Rights.


NEW YORK — Nearly 6 in 10 Americans believe the First Amendment is under threat, according to a new survey, yet a large portion of respondents couldn’t correctly name what the amendment protects.

Of the 2,000 adults who took part in the poll, half thought that “liberty” is one of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, while nearly half (49 percent) believed “the pursuit of happiness” was included. Thankfully, only 3 percent named “life” as one of the protected freedoms.

What’s more, barely more than a quarter (26 percent) of participants knew how many amendments even comprise the Bill of Rights. In fact, 1 in 5 people wasn’t even familiarwith the Bill of Rights when asked.

Despite the struggle with what should be common American knowledge, the survey — commissioned by the Samuel Hubbard Shoe Company — revealed that 57 percent of respondents feel the First Amendment is at risk in the nation’s current climate. Many people point to bias in the media and the rise of fake news as main reasons for their concern. One in seven admit they have trouble telling the difference between real and fake news, while 31 percent agree the mainstream media struggles to report the news of the day without inserting bias within their coverage.

A sad state of affairs.  More proof our education system is broken and the Department of Education should be abolished entirely.  Put education back in state’s hands.  Encourage more homeschooling.

It is all on purpose, by the way.  The more disconnected Americans are from the founding doctrines and principles, the less patriotic and attached to the country they will be.  It’s just another prong in the many-pronged approach to attack nationalism, and specifically in this case what it means to be American.  That term has functionally lost pretty much all its meaning at this point.

It’s also a bit scary that the majority of the country doesn’t even recognize the mainstream media bias out there today.

Look beyond the narrative

I am willing to bet most of you did not hear about the attack two weeks ago where at least 32 Christians were slaughtered in a village in Nigeria, along with having at least one of their churches burned to the ground and a hundred more displaced, by a Muslim group.

At least 32 Christians were killed by suspected Fulani extremists in Nigeria Tuesday, sources told a leading Christian persecution monitoring group.

The early-morning attack occurred in the district of Maro in the Kaduna state of north-central Nigeria, according to reports. In addition to the loss of life, homes and at least one church were burned as hundreds were displaced. Some homes even reportedly had sleeping residents inside when they were lit on fire.

“Please pray for peace in Kaduna state — hundreds have been displaced and hundreds killed by the Fulani jihadists,” The Rev. Bakari Ibrahim, director of the ECWA’s Evangelical Missionary Society, told Morning Star News. “We evacuated about a hundred EMS kids from Kufana for safety.”

Resident Mordecai Funom Ibrahim told the persecution news outlet that about 400 armed Fulanis attacked villages around Maro around 6 a.m. Tuesday.

At the time of the attack, a group of women affiliated with the ECWA had gathered for a meeting at the local church.

“We ran out of the church building as the shooting was going on,” one of the women from the group told Morning Star News. “Many have been killed, and I have not seen my family members since morning. I have escaped out of the area.”

This was not a one time event either.  Last week 52 more Christians were killed and the death toll is over 120 since February by the same alleged Fulani militant group.

Hmmm.  A religiously motivated attack on a large group of people.  Where have I heard about this recently?

This is not meant to take anything away from the horrific New Zealand attacks of the past week.  It is merely to point out the hypocrisy in the reporting and the absolutely disgusting state we are in.  There is a lot of speculation regarding the New Zealand shooter.  Whether this really was an attack pushing back on multiculturalism, was religiously motivated, or a false flag (there is credible evidence for both) the point is the mainstream media pushed one story very hard and the other one doesn’t even get a 10 second mention on most, if any, mainstream news sites.  Why?

We know why.  One fits the narrative and their motivations, the other does not.  What better way to push gun control than having a white guy slaughter dozens of people of color?  Sure, we can even paint him as a far-right extremist.  That works.  Given the ground the deep state has ceded and their obvious desperation this would not be at all surprising if this was done themselves.  There are a lot of attacks like that recently, and we have expected them for a while now as they continue to lose a battle not being talked about publicly.  And it gives them something to point to the right and say, “See!  They’re the violent ones!  Ban guns!” while the feral left continues to ramp up the violence themselves.  A story of (brown) Muslims slaughtering Christians does not help further their objectives at all.

They also do this to paint a false picture about the amount of violence or crime a particular group does; to either disproportionately pump up and make you think one group does a lot more violence of a particular sort, or to bury stories to cover up the amount of crime done by a particular group to make it seem like it’s far less than is actually happening.  Something tells me the general public would be far more vocal about 3rd world immigration if they saw the number of religiously motivated attacks that happen on a daily basis.  Or maybe they’d reconsider the underlying problem, if they really wanted to fix the problem, if they honestly reported on the amount of violence in Chicago every day.  Instead they push stories like this, which make you think insane white dudes regularly shoot up churches with big weapons and that it’s a glaring problem that requires support on both sides to fix immediately.

The mainstream media does not actually care about the victims of the New Zealand shooting.  They just used it as a way to push their agenda.  Christians are one of if not the most persecuted groups in the Middle East but you never hear about attacks on them.  When is the last time you heard a call from the MSM to accept more Christian refugees, aside from maybe Tucker Carlson?

Would you want to be judged by a jury of your peers in 2019 America?

The United States is fracturing.  On the surface it appears to be mostly along political lines, but more and more it is clear that it is predominantly along racial lines.  There is a race war going on in this country, and the target is white America.  Straight, white men in particular are the group most targeted and hardest hit.  Most racial groups recognize this and form groups to vote and enact policy that best represents and helps their group.  Whites in America have been the last group to realize this or who want to play the identity politics game.  Whether it is the right thing to do or not, if they want any chance of survival they need to play the game too.  The egalitarian mindset that this country was founded on only works if the country is made up of like-minded people who actually think this way too.  As we continue to import more and more people who come from places that do not have this mindset we will only stray further from the tenets that this country was founded on.

This really is not an exaggeration.  Look at the number of hate hoaxes just within the first few weeks of 2019.  They so desperately want a group of white men to perform heinous acts in the name of racism to make Trump look bad.  The way in which grown adults treated the Covington boys is absolutely pathetic and disgraceful.  Notice that not only did they absolutely vilify a group of teenagers, but even after they were caught how many talking heads from the MSM did you hear rightly calling out the grown adult Native American?  Or how about the black supremacist group the Black Hebrew Israelites?  No.  They just went on their merry way to launch into hysterics about some other issue for the current news cycle.  No accountability.

The same goes for this poor excuse for an actor, Jussie Smollett and his abhorrent hate hoax claiming a couple of white guys, in Chicago, wearing MAGA hats, in freezing temperature, put a noose around him and poured bleach on him yelling racist and homophobic slurs.  Okay.  And look how the mainstream media took this story and ran with it before any facts came out whatsoever.  Stoking the fire.  Disgusting Ellen Page going off on her diatribe on Stephen Colbert.  Funny how many people erased tweets and thought we would forget how they vilified a group of people that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the fake attack.  In the end, it appears he hired two Nigererian brothers from the set of his show to stage the attack.  You can’t make this stuff up.

The media and the left are frothing at the mouth hoping to pounce on any one of these stories.  They want so desperately bad for these stories to be true.  Time and time again we are told that these are racist white dudes committing these heinous crimes and time and time again it is found that most of the hate hoaxes have been performed by the very same minority groups.

So I ask again – would you want to be judged by a jury of your peers in America in 2019?  Especially if you were a white man?  Perhaps, if you live in a largely homogeneous community, this may not be an issue.  But what if you live in an ultra liberal area and happen to be a conservative?  If I lived in San Francisco, arguably the ground zero cesspool of liberal ideas, it would give me pause to remain there.  Look at the trial of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, Kate Steinle’s killer.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a.k.a. Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, the illegal alien, five-time deportee, and seven-time convicted felon who killed 32-year-old American Kate Steinle in July 2015, was sentenced to time served on Friday after being convicted in November of possession of a firearm by a felon.

Zarate was acquitted of the murder and assault charges he faced, in what critics called an example of jury nullification in the politically-charged case.

Zarate was sentenced to three years in state prison, but “will be on parole for 48 months and will remain in custody to face federal charges,” according to Fox News.  Those federal charges include weapons and immigration offenses.

I wonder if the ultra liberal jury would have been as lenient on a white man who killed a black girl.  They let off a five-time deportee and seven-time convicted felon who should not have been here in the first place, essentially for political reasons and because he was a poor POC.  They let him off to TIME SERVED.

Or what if a black man plowed into a group of anti-racist protestors at a Black Lives Matter rally and killed one and injured dozens others.  Think he would get life in prison and an additional 419 years?  If he did, I do wonder if CNN or MSNBC might have their talking heads talking about how racist the sentencing is.  Claiming it was clearly not first-degree murder because he had just invited friends for lunch and had put his home address into Google maps.  In 2019 anyways that does not sound too far-fetched anyways.

In the court of public opinion, if you are a straight, white male you are guilty until proven innocent.  Recall the hysteria over the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco.  All those screeching liberals, who were quick to call the guy a gang-rapist, had nothing to lose in doing so because there are never any consequences to their actions.  You don’t read too many stories nowadays about all those concerned with Dr Ford or the other accusers still investigating to find evidence, do you?  No.  Now that he is on the Supreme Court there is no reason for them to do so because they never actually cared about any potential victim(s) in the first place.  That news cycle is over so they move on to the next issue they can screech about.

When there are no consequences to one’s actions they will continue their bad behavior.  If we do not immediately prosecute or kick out illegal immigrants they will continue to try and sneak into the country.  If we continue to let people off the hook for hate hoaxes or false accusations they will continue to accuse accuse accuse.  Some day, it could be you, or me, they may just accuse of something that cannot be proven or disproven.  The falsely accused thus far have been fortunate to have tangible evidence on their side.  But that may not be the case all the time.

Again, this country was founded on egalitarian values and Christian morals.  As both of these continue to erode it looks increasingly obvious that we are headed for civil war.  As we continue to import more people from countries that do not believe either in egalitarianism or Christian morality things like facts, logic, and evidence will become less important.  People will not judge a particular court case dispassionately based on the evidence.  Remember, immigrants are no longer trying to assimilate at all as they come here.  If we remove assimilation, and do not look at everyone living here as American but rather white, black, Hispanic, Asian, or whatever, then in-group preferences and tribalism will reign supreme.

Just a reminder: the mainstream media is the enemy of the people

I came across this graphic recently showing some of stories the Washington Post has run about impeaching President Trump.

IMG_2922

Could you imagine how much more unified this country might be if only the mainstream media honestly reported the news and facts?  What sane person can honestly say President Trump should be impeached?  What evidence is there?  Please, if anyone has any, enlighten me in the comment section.  I really would like to know if it did exist.

Absolutely nothing has been found in this BS Russia investigation.  They have combed over every detail of his life, legally and illegally, for over two years now and haven’t found a shred of evidence in any realm to support the notion that he should be impeached.  In a sane world, it should give American citizens a sense of relief that their President is squeaky clean.  No President in US history has ever been under the scrutiny this one has and they have found nothing on him.  I cannot seem to find a similar infographic on constant calls for impeachment for Obama from the Washington Post even though one could make a much more compelling case what with the illegal spying on Americans (and journalists), fast and furious, biased auditing of conservatives, the sketchiness around the Iran deal and the goings on in Syria, to name just a few.  But hey, it would be racist to even suggest holding Obama up to the same standard as Trump, so I’ll just be quiet now.

A Friendly Reminder

Could you imagine how big a story it would be if it was discovered that a Republican Congressman had a Chinese spy working on his staff for 20 years?  That’s a question posed, surprisingly, by The Washington Post in an article from August of 2018 with regards to the revelation that Diane Feinstein had just that.  It is now six months later and this story has been completely forgotten.  From that article:

Feinstein acknowledged the infiltration but played down its significance. “Five years ago the FBI informed me it had concerns that an administrative member of my California staff was potentially being sought out by the Chinese government to provide information,” Feinstein said in a statement — which means the breach took place while Feinstein was heading the Intelligence Committee. But, Feinstein insisted, “he never had access to classified or sensitive information or legislative matters” and was immediately fired. In other words: junior staffer, no policy role, no access to secrets, quickly fired — no big deal.

But it is a big deal. I asked several former senior intelligence and law enforcement officials how serious this breach might have been. “It’s plenty serious,” one former top Justice Department official told me. “Focusing on his driver function alone, in Mafia families, the boss’s driver was among the most trusted men in the crew, because among other things he heard everything that was discussed in the car.”

A former top CIA clandestine officer explained to me what the agency would do if it had recruited the driver of a senior official such as Feinstein. “We would have the driver record on his phone all conversations that Feinstein would have with passengers and phone calls in her car. If she left her phone, iPad or laptop in the car while she went to meetings, social events, dinners, etc., we would have the driver download all her devices. If the driver drove for her for 20 years, he would probably would have had access to her office and homes. We would have had the source put down an audio device in her office or homes if the opportunity presented itself. Depending on the take from all of what the source reported, we would use the info to target others that were close to her and exhibited some type of vulnerability.”

“In short,” this officer said, “we would have had a field day.”

This would be nonstop coverage from the mainstream media if it were indeed a Republican Congressman.  Don Lemon would be crying and demanding justice on a nightly basis.  Dig a little deeper and you notice that they certainly try to obfuscate this fact and cover it up.  Snopes.com, whom we are to believe is the bastion of truth, says this claim is unproven.  Because any company that does the fact-checking for Facebook should be blindly believed, right?  But we are a society with an ever decreasing attention span, so once a story leaves the news cycle I guess that means the issue is settled, huh?

If the story doesn’t fit the narrative…bury it

CNN requested a local perspective in San Diego regarding the border.  Of course, when the reporter reported that the barrier actually has been working…they no longer wanted the report:

We believe CNN declined a report from KUSI because we informed them that most Border Patrol Agents we have spoken to told us the barrier does in fact work.

We have continuously been told by Border Patrol Agents that the barrier along the Southern border helps prevent illegal entries, drugs, and weapons from entering the United States, and the numbers prove it.

Meanwhile, California has spent $5 billion on a bullet train that isn’t anywhere near completed.  I wonder what one could buy with roughly $5 billion right about now…

#priorities

A Race to the Bottom

As the Government shutdown continues to drag on one thing seems apparent: those opposing the wall are hoping their constituents aren’t paying attention or just don’t care.  Consider a few of the facts presented by President Trump in a letter President Trump sent to Congress earlier this month:

  • In fiscal year (FY) 2018, 17,000 adults at the border with existing criminal records were arrested by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and border agents.
  • In FY2017 and FY2018, ICE officers arrested approximately 235,000 aliens on various criminal charges or convictions within the interior of the United States—including roughly 100,000 for assault, 30,000 for sex crimes, and 4,000 for homicides.
  • We are now averaging 60,000 illegal and inadmissible aliens a month on our Southern Border.
  • Last month alone, more than 20,000 minors were smuggled into the United States.
  • The immigration court backlog is nearly 800,000 cases.
  • There has been a 2,000 percent increase in asylum claims over the last five years, with the largest growth coming from Central America—while around 9 in 10 claims from Central American migrants are ultimately rejected by the immigration courts, the applicant has long since been released into the interior of the United States.
  • In FY2017, roughly 135,000 illegal and inadmissible family units arrived from Central America. Of those, less than 2 percent have been successfully removed from the country due to a shortage of resources and glaring loopholes in our federal laws.
  • So far in FY2019, we have seen a 280 percent increase in family units from FY2018.
  • 300 Americans are killed every week from heroin—90 percent of which floods across our Southern Border.
  • Illegal immigration is a humanitarian crisis: 1 in 3 migrant women is sexually assaulted on the journey northward to the U.S. border; 50 illegal migrants a day are referred for emergency medical care; and CBP rescues 4,300 people a year who are in danger and distress.

That is an airtight case that there is a problem at the border and that a wall is one of many things that needs to be done to help curb the problem.  Then consider that through restructuring NAFTA we are saving billions of dollars (Mexico indirectly paying), or consider the staggering amounts of wasteful government spending that occurs on a daily basis.  Or how about the amount of money we spend on foreign wars that we shouldn’t even be a part of?  Or this; Rand Paul recently tweeted that we give foreign aid to China and borrow money from them to pay them back…

screen shot 2019-01-12 at 8.54.58 am

The point being that we waste so much money on so much crap that even if the wall was a complete waste of money, $5.7 billion dollars is less than a drop in the bucket compared to the amount we spend each year and why not give it a shot to see if it does anything?

It gets even worse.  Chuck and Nancy, the two-headed monster that is the mouthpiece of the opposition party, voted for fencing several times, as did then Senators Obama and Clinton.  We even had the money earmarked for it and the fence was simply never built.  So we’re supposed to take Chuck and Nancy on their word that it’s immoral and just bad for *reasons* while they previously voted for it in the past?  And for the cherry on top, why is it okay that we fund a wall in Jordan but cannot do the same for ourselves?  Why is it okay for Israel to have a wall but not for ourselves?  Did you know Chuck Schumer, as well as many other members of Congress have dual citizenship and are Israeli citizens as well?  Why is it okay for them to defend their borders, Chuck, but we aren’t?

It is clear they do not care about Americans and in fact think so little of us that they think we’re stupid enough to listen to them deride the wall without noticing their past track record or their current stances in general.  It is downright insulting and shows the absolute disdain with which they view the American public.

Which leads to the thrust of the idea.  I really believe these people are hoping that they can dumb down the American public faster than they think we can catch onto their lies.  Watch a news broadcast from even 15 years ago compared to today.  You may once in a while actually find a spirited debate where opposing views are actually debated at the same time and both viewpoints being heard.  Take a look at this video of Jared Taylor talking with Donahue about race in America.  This conversation would NEVER occur today.  They would NEVER want you to hear the facts or hear the viewpoint that Jared brings to the table.  No.  Now segments are one-sided and they are so short nothing of substance is ever said before another commercial break or topic change takes place.  The “opponent” in today’s segments are usually controlled opposition (read: approved).  Sometimes someone like Tucker will get someone on where there is genuine pushback but the segments are so short that neither side can really have the time to get their point across and it often ends in a screaming match that Tucker needs to end because they aren’t getting anywhere.

This isn’t a coincidence.  The mainstream media is dumbing down the American public.  They are removing the critical thinking skills that we all once had in much greater abundance.  Couple that with distracting smart phones, shorter video clips, more commercials, and less people reading, and you get a genuinely dumbed down public.  IQ scores are falling worldwide.  Mainstream media will want you to believe that is due to climate change…but it is more likely due to the reasons stated in the Unz article.  Either way, the fact is they really are falling.  People really are getting dumber.  You are not just imagining it.  And Americans are reading less and less every year which cannot help critical thinking skills or holding attention spans.

All of this adds up to people like Chuck and Nancy thinking they can somehow justify their current position on the wall and not think anyone will notice how patently absurd it is.  Or worse, maybe they do know and just don’t think anyone will care.  Entertainment has been the opiate of the masses.  So long as people are comfortable and distracted many simply will not care about a wall or the hypocrisies of these people.  I fear a majority of the population will be in for a rude awakening when civilization as we know it begins to break down because we never addressed these problems and let them fester and metastasize to the point that they become uncontrollable.  Perhaps we have already passed the point of no return.  The trend certainly seems to be pointing that way.  But maybe it has not.  And I’m thankful we have a President who is standing his ground and genuinely fighting to reverse this trend.

Looking ahead into 2019

There was a lot to be learned in 2018 if one was paying attention.  Here’s a few observations that we can learn from to use in 2019.

The Programming Runs Deep

People really can be programmed.  The more someone listens to the mainstream media news, or talk shows, or Netflix, or a variety of other narrative-approved sources, the stronger the connection.  Scott Adams likens it to two movies on the same screen.  Essentially people’s opinions and thoughts can be altered by the information they allow to feed into their brains.  This sounds obvious on the surface.  But the level of control and the amount of control is scary.  Social engineering.  This has been known for a long time.  Check out Edward Bernays and the Art of Public Manipulation.

It starts small.  Maybe it’s an innocuous image or two of a multi-racial family in a print ad or TV commercial.  Innocent in and of itself until you realize what they’re trying to do.  Or maybe it’s a slight change of lettering or wording.  The Berenstain Bears instead of the Berenstein Bears.  Or inventing terms like Judeo-Christian.  Or how about using Google vs Bing for your search results.  If you can accept that maybe there is a deeper, darker, more sinister objective to these types of seemingly innocent things you can begin to see what is going on.

IMG_2749.JPG

This has gone on for years.  It is not a new phenomena.  But it has hit a tipping point with many people.  Changes are happening faster over a shorter time period now.  Heck, look at Democratic talking points from 2018 vs 2008.  A 2008 Democrat was very anti-war.  Now they are mad President Trump is pulling out of an illegal war in Syria.  Once they were for the “little guy”.  Now they are all about big corporation funding.  A fence/wall, which they were all for in 2006 and 2013, is all of a sudden now the hill they’re willing to die on.  Most Democrats weren’t for gay marriage until about 10 years ago either.  Nor were they for illegal immigration.

All this is to say to be careful about what you watch and what you allow your loved ones to watch.  They do not report the news in an unbiased manner.  They have an agenda.  Look up who owns the NY Times or the Washington Post.  Do you really think these billionaires don’t have an ulterior motive other than presenting the news and facts as they are?  Of course not.  It’ll only get worse.  And the inversion of our values will only get worse.

For better or worse, it’s made me question a lot of the things I once took for granted.  We’ll get into this more later this year but even things like the moon landing are now questionable events that I once took for undisputed truth.  You will never go wrong by pursuing the truth.  You may get led down dark paths and discover things you never wanted to know, but this is ALWAYS preferable to lying to yourself.  Once you lie to yourself you can rationalize all sorts of evil and undesirable behavior and actions.

Evil is Real

This ties in a bit with the first point.  True evil does exist out there.  We’ve spoken about the rampant pedophelia problem in DC and Hollywood.  One of the ways the Cabal controls people is through blackmail.  Subscribe to Owen Benjamin if you want a rational, down to Earth view of the dark, sinister shit that goes on in these circles.  He was in these circles but couldn’t give in to the evil that necessarily seems to go along with making it “big” in Hollywood or DC.

Evil is real.  Sometimes it’s easier to spot evil than it is to spot good.  For me, I began to really notice and take seriously true evil around the time of Pizzagate.  That link is a pretty good starting point.  Check out neonrevolt.com and crazydaysandnights.net to go down that rabbit hole a little bit more.  It is not for the faint of heart.  If you can accept that evil is a real thing then you are on the path to truth.  It has rejuvenated my interest in Christianity, something I took for granted but now realize how much it has shaped our civilization and we’ve all gotten a glimpse of what a post-Christian Western civilization world looks like without it.  It is not pretty.  If you can accept that true evil exists then that is a good starting point to seeing that truth and true good also exists.  This is the path to Christ.

Protect Yourselves

2018 saw an unprecedented amount of censorship and deplatforming.  Dissident personalities like Alex Jones were rigorously ostracized and attacked for having views that did not fit with the accepted narrative.  Alternative news sources and individuals were demonetized and deplatformed on Twitter and YouTube like never before.  This is not an accident.  They are trying to silence the voices of those who speak truth and offer alternative viewpoints to the thoughts and opinions they want you to think.  “They” being the Master of the Universe aka Silicon Valley and their Deep State backers.  The cat is out of the bag.  This isn’t some tinfoil hat conspiracy theory anymore.

It’s a dangerous time to be a conservative in America.  You can easily be doxxed and have your life ruined for sharing your opinions.  I debated using a pseudonym or not when starting this site.  It’s certainly a risk to use one’s real name these days.  Be careful with what you post.  Consider what is at stake and what you’re willing to risk to share your opinions.  One should always post and profess the truth.  Just be careful with whom and how you share the truth.  It is not an even playing field out there.

2019 is going to be a good year.  The pieces are in place to have the hammer drop on the swamp creatures in DC and Hollywood.  Let’s learn from what happened in 2018 and continue to grow and adapt.  The attacks that come at us will only make us stronger.  Our arguments and positions are sharpened from all the criticism and vitriol.  We are antifragile.

Jerry Brown thinks climate change is as serious as WWII

Outgoing California governor Jerry Brown thinks fighting climate change is as important as fighting the Nazis in World War II.  A few snippets from his Meet the Press interview:

California Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown warned that America and the rest of the world are falling behind in the fight against climate change and likened the challenge to fighting the Nazis in World War II.

In an interview for Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” the outgoing governor called on President Donald Trump to take the lead in addressing the issue. “Instead of worrying about tariffs, I’d like to see the president and the Congress invest tens of billions in renewable energy, in more-efficient batteries, to get us off fossil fuel as quickly as we can,” Brown said.

“I would point to the fact that it took Roosevelt many, many years to get America willing to go into World War II and fight the Nazis. Well, we have an enemy, though different, but perhaps, very much devastating in a similar way. And we’ve got to fight climate change. And the president’s got to lead on that.”

And further:

Trump’s lack of urgency on the issue exemplifies the partisan divide on climate change. A recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released this month found that more than 70 percent of Democrats believe climate change is both “serious” and requires “immediate action,” but that just 15 percent of Republicans felt the same way.

Overall, people are growing more and more convinced of the urgency of the issue—45 percent of all Americans said they eel that sense of urgency, the highest since the poll started to ask the question in 1999.

Do you think maybe more people are being convinced of the urgency of the issue because you, the mainstream media, sensationalize and exaggerate?  Because you use fear-mongering to push your agenda?  Do you think maybe that has something to do with it?  Check out some of the #climate change posts to see how out of control their lying is.  The reality is they have no idea how good or bad the climate really is.  Their models are consistently wrong.

Think about how absurd and utterly despicable it is to compare climate change to the events of World War II.  Think about the hubris and/or utter disregard for the reactions of people to these BS statements.  It’s downright evil to peddle this line of thinking.  It is pure fear-mongering to even suggest this is as bad as that time more than 60 or so MILLION people died.  He’s essentially asking us to destroy our economy by investing billions of dollars to combat an alleged problem we’re not even sure we have.  And sorry, polling Republicans and Democrats doesn’t make the problem all of a sudden appear or disappear.  It really does not matter what anyone thinks…it does not change whether there is a problem or not.

If the Democrats really, truly, cared about climate change, they would immediately curb all immigration to first world countries.  If the “carbon footprint” thing is still the way they’re measuring our effects (it will probably change when they realize this doesn’t really help their case as much as they hope) then why would you import more people into 1st world countries, where the carbon footprint is vastly bigger?  The sooner one realizes that today’s liberals contradict themselves on nearly every issue, the sooner one can quit wasting their time arguing with them…arguments where facts don’t matter because they fall on deaf ears or because they only understand rhetoric.

%d bloggers like this: