Trump to sign executive order ending birthright citizenship for illegals

YES!!!

That’s all that needs to be said.  This is a monumental step forward in an immigration debate that has stalled and sputtered for decades.  Via Fox News:

President Trump said in a newly released interview he plans to sign an executive order ending so-called “birthright citizenship” for babies of non-citizens born on U.S. soil — a move that would mark a major overhaul of immigration policy and trigger an almost-certain legal battle.

Birthright citizenship allows any baby born on U.S. soil to automatically be a U.S. citizen.

The policy, which stems from a disputed but long-recognized interpretation of the 14th Amendment, has given rise to what Trump considers abuse of the immigration system. Trump told “Axios on HBO” that the U.S. is the only country in the world “where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States … with all of those benefits.”

Despite Trump’s claim, the U.S. is not the only nation to have birthright citizenship, but the policy is rare outside of the Americas. Trump called birthright citizenship “ridiculous” and said that “it has to end.”

Under current policy, anyone born in the U.S. – regardless of whether they are delivered by a non-citizen or undocumented immigrant – is considered a citizen. The interpretation has been blamed for so-called ‘birth tourism’ and chain migration.

The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump, should he pursue the executive order, would face court challenges, and it remains unclear whether he could prevail. Many legal scholars would argue such a change requires a constitutional amendment. But some conservatives argue the existing amendment holds room for interpretation.

Take a look at this article I wrote a few months back regarding the interpretation of the 14th amendment for more insight.  The debate portion of this is that the 14th amendment does not explicitly say one way or the other whether it should be legal for non-citizens (or invaders) and there was historical precedence which would suggest illegals were NOT included in it.  As you would of course hope and expect, but sadly that has not been the case historically here.  Those against Trump’s executive order will say he cannot put an EO on something that isn’t technically law in this direction either.

Regardless if one thinks he can or cannot this will force the issue to make longstanding change to a broken immigration policy.  I’ve posted a video from Styxhexenhammer down below that expounds on this nicely.  In order to have a functioning country we need to be a nation of laws.  Laws that are upheld and followed.  Birth tourism, where people from other countries vacation here with the specific intent of having a baby here who is then a citizen and can then be used to gain citizenship themselves, is a huge industry.  Do we really think that people intent on breaking our laws from the beginning, literally from birth, will make upstanding citizens in the long term?  Seriously?

Of course not.  This should discourage a multitude of wannabe pseudo-Americans to try in the first place, which is a huge first step in stopping the problem.  Couple this with a wall, ending chain migration in general, and slowing down legal immigration to a trickle will all greatly improve the lives of AMERICAN citizens.  The people who, you know, should be the main priority of every politician running for office here in AMERICA.

Bravo to President Trump, yet again, for standing up against the mob and bully tactics of the mainstream media.  Politicians have caved for far too long to sad images of children on TV or the moral “outrage” from hysterical leftists.  It takes a real leader to ignore the noise, ignore the hysteria, and do what’s right, even if it paints a bigger target on his back.

NBC covered up news that would have helped Kavanaugh

It has come to light that NBC held key information that would have helped Kavanaugh during the toughest moments of his nomination but chose to withhold it.  I wonder why.  Per Breitbart:

On September 30, a week prior to Kavanaugh’s confirmation, during the most intense days of this scandal, when Kavanaugh’s confirmation was still very much in doubt, here is what NBC did not want the public to know…

If you recall, although he withheld the name, Avenatti tweeted out a sworn statement from a woman who backed up Swetnick’s outrageous rape allegations. In her statement, this second woman swore that she, too, had witnessed Kavanaugh spike punch bowls and take sexual advantage of girls.

Well, unbeknownst to us, NBC interviewed this anonymous witness on September 30, and she recanted!

But only now is NBC News bothering to report this bombshell:

Referring to Kavanaugh spiking the punch, “I didn’t ever think it was Brett,” the woman said to reporters in a phone interview arranged by Avenatti on Sept. 30 after repeated requests to speak with other witnesses who might corroborate Swetnick’s claims.

When asked in the phone interview if she ever witnessed Kavanaugh act inappropriately towards girls, the woman replied, “no.”

Wait, it gets worse…

On October 3, NBC News again spoke to this woman, and this time, she all but accused Avenatti of fabricating her statement:

[R]eached by phone independently from Avenatti on Oct. 3, the woman said she only “skimmed” the declaration. After reviewing the statement, she wrote in a text on Oct. 4 to NBC News: “It is incorrect that I saw Brett spike the punch. I didn’t see anyone spike the punch…I was very clear with Michael Avenatti from day one.”

When pressed about abusive behavior towards girls, she wrote in a text: “I would not ever allow anyone to be abusive in my presence. Male or female.”

And now, we come to the grand conclusion…

When asked about the total contradiction between his client’s sworn statement and what she told NBC, after it no longer matters, NBC now informs us, “At one point, in an apparent effort to thwart the reporting process, [Avenatti] added in the phone call, “How about this, on background, it’s not the same woman. What are you going to do with that?”

So Avenatti’s witness, the woman he brought forward to bolster Swetnick’s serial rape claim, totally recanted to NBC News, and NBC News hid this news until now.

Moreover, NBC News believed Kavanaugh’s chief tormentor —  Avenatti  — was attempting to “thwart the reporting process,” and NBC also chose to hide this information until long after it mattered.

So what we have here is an NBC News eager to publish completely unfounded allegations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh while at the same time hiding vitally important information that would have helped to clear Kavanaugh at the most crucial time of this scandal.

In other words, in a partisan effort to derail Kavanaugh’s confirmation, to do its part to keep Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court, NBC News published uncorroborated smears against him and then engaged in a deliberate cover up of a legitimate story that backed up Kavanaugh’s claim of his innocence and his claim that there was a coordinated campaign at work to personally destroy him.

And this is example #2349807523478902354789023548790235487902345 why you should not trust the mainstream media.  They do not present the news in anything close to an unbiased fashion.  Perhaps they never have.  35 years ago 90% of the media was controlled by 50 companies.  Today, 90% of the media is controlled by just 6.  Almost 300 million Americans rely on just these six companies to get their news.  You are simply being naive if you don’t think that they have an agenda.  They want you to think in a certain way.  They want to control what you buy, how you buy it, what you think, who you should vote for, and what you should feel about every event that happens across the globe.  And their reasons are not for your betterment.  NBC wanted you to think Kavanaugh was a serial rapist.  They had evidence to refute the one claim made against him for this and chose not to run with it.  Ask yourself this: why should NBC care whether Kavanaugh is nominated or not?  What reason would they have to not report this key information if they were an unbiased news network that didn’t care whether he was nominated or not but just wanted to report the news.  They put the effort in to do “investigative journalism” so why not actually report the findings?

Spread this to your friends who still rely on the MSM to get their news.  Gently remind them of things like this, or their election predictions, when you receive news of how the midterm polling is going or what shooter or bomber did today and what motivations they had.  Question why they may report on some things and not on others.  Here’s an infographic that’s a little old (sub Comcast in for GE and one or two other minor updates) but you’ll get an idea.  This is all just a big business.  They will report on what needs reporting to further their interests.  Not to keep you “in the know” on what’s happening here or around the world.

 

It will only get worse

Riots broke out in Chemnitz after a German man was killed by two migrants from Syria and Iraq.  Via RT:

German society must firmly stand against the outbursts of right-wing extremism, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said. His call came after right-wing protesters clashed with police at an anti-migrant rally.

“We must stand up to the right-wing extremists. We can’t duck away. We must show our faces against neo-Nazis and anti-Semites,” Maas told German paper Bild on Sunday. “Only then will Germany’s reputation not be permanently marred by xenophobic crimes.”

Reflecting on the violence, which erupted during anti-migrant demonstrations in Chemnitz the day before, the minister argued that Germans of his generation sometimes “take for granted” their existing freedoms and democracy, and that has to change.

Notice how the politicians come out in droves only when it’s coming from the native population or anything slightly right of center.  They must be “right-wing extremists” because they are angry that someone who doesn’t belong in their country in the first place is killing their fellow countrymen.  The absolute worst thing that could be suggested of a German is that they show any outward rejection of some other group of people.  World War 2 has utterly destroyed their psyches.  They continue on in a guilt-ridden stupor, ready to self-destruct and allow their country to be overrun and ruined for fear of being called a racist or xenophobe by expressing any semblance of doubt or resistance.  So sad.

Riots

As native populations continued to be overrun by non-stop 3rd world immigration these clashes will only get worse.  Notice how the media will always portray the natives who are trying to voice their concerns as the bad guys every single time.  Notice also how the immigration is only encouraged and expected in Western countries.  Israel, for one, is happy to tell other countries to take on more people, while they themselves strengthen their borders and impose strict immigration enforcement to prevent the exact invasion that is occurring everywhere else.

The end result here will not be good.  As much as they want you to believe it, this level of multiculturalism is suicide.  Especially when incoming migrants are no longer being taught to assimilate, but rather bring their cultures with them and spread these disparate cultures all throughout the land.  Which as we know will only lead to war.  The clash of cultures and differences in belief systems, differences in right and wrong, will inevitably lead to conflict as ideologies that cannot possibly live peacefully together are thrust ever closer to each other.

Black Facts Matter

Jerome Hudson wrote an excellent piece on Breitbart about black crime statistics.  It should be an eye-opener for those not paying attention and runs totally counter to what the MSM wants you to believe, mainly that white cops are racist and white people are out to get black people all the time, as if they had nothing better to do.  Five facts from the article:

FACT 1. Over 1,400 more black Americans murdered other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968.

According to FBI data, 4,906 black people murdered other blacks in 2010 and 2011. That is 1,460 more black Americans killed by other blacks in two years than were lynched from 1882 to 1968, according to the Tuskegee Institute.

FACT 2. Black People (mostly men) commit a grossly disproportionate amount of crime.

In 2012, white males were 38 percent of the population and committed 4,582 murders. That same year, black males were just 6.6 percent of the population but committed a staggering 5,531 murders.

In other words: black people–at just a fifth of the size–committed almost 1,000 more murders than their white counterparts.

The figures above highlight a horrific truth that black racialists and white liberals routinely ignore: Lawbreaking black Americans, young black males particularly, put themselves in close proximity to (mostly white male) police officers at rates sometimes five to 10 times higher than whites. This is a recipe for disaster. Thusly….

FACT 3. Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks committed half of homicides in the United States for nearly 30 years.

DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, black people committed 52% of homicides.

In 2013, black criminals committed 38% of the murders. Whites accounted for just 31 percent.

There are five times fewer black people than white people in America and, yet, they consistently carry out a larger share of the crimes? Given this rate, it’s no wonder that there aren’t more assistances where cops kill black criminals.

FACT 4. Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined.

There have been almost as many deaths in one American city as there have been in the two major wars carried out by the U.S. military this century.

Chicago’s death toll from 2001November, 26 2015 stands at 7,401. The combined total deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2015: 4,815) and Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan (2001-2015: 3,506), total 8,321.

FACT 5. It would take cops 40 years to kill as many black men as have died at the hands of others black men in 2012 alone.

University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest crime data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports and Centers for Disease Control and found that an average of 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012.

Professor Johnson’s research further concluded that 112 black men died from both justified and unjustified police-involved killings annually during this same period.

Black Lives Matter does not care about black people.  If they truly did you’d hear more about programs to end black on black violence.  Instead they only ever come out of the woodwork when there’s an altercation between a white cop and black man.  As the article points out, the rare white-cop-killing-black-man shouldn’t be surprising given the amount of times a cop is needed for a crime committed by a black man.  It has nothing to do with racism.  The recent onslaught of bodycam footage only confirms this.

And as with most causes the left supports these days, their motives are often hidden by superficial fronts of “equality” or “justice” or something of the sort.  The left pushes racism in this regard to further an agenda, much like they push school shootings to try and push gun control, when in reality the facts pretty much always discredit what they are saying.

This is why so many hold so much disdain for the mainstream media.  They push lies that are utterly destructive and divisive.  It’s why many think they are an enemy of the state, and rightfully so.  Mainstream journalism seems to have died years ago.  And when 6 companies control 90% of the media in America it used to be easy to set and control the narrative.  This has changed a bit in the past few years as alternative media has had a meteoric rise and chipped away at the credibility of the CNNs of the world.  Imagine if mainstream media actually worked to publish facts as they came up, not based on a narrative, but just to actually report the news as it happened.  The fact that sentence even needs to be typed out tells you all you need to know about the state we’re in.

MSM Folks – WaPo: ‘God bless the deep state’

Eugene Robinson of the dumpster fire known as the Washington Post has released an opinion piece praising the deep state.  Yep.  Seriously.  A few choice snippets from the article.

Before this harebrained and reckless administration is history, the nation will have cause to celebrate the public servants derided by Trumpists as the supposed “deep state.”

The term itself is propaganda, intended to cast a sinister light upon men and women whom Trump and his minions find annoyingly knowledgeable and experienced. They are not participants in any kind of dark conspiracy. Rather, they are feared and loathed by the president and his wrecking crew of know-nothings because they have spent years — often decades — mastering the details of foreign and domestic policy.

God bless them. With a supine Congress unwilling to play the role it is assigned by the Constitution, the deep state stands between us and the abyss.

Is it propaganda too that opposition research was used as the primary source to spy on a political opponent’s campaign, Eugene?  Or that there’s been a witch hunt to try and pin ANYTHING on President Trump to try and impeach him in a soft coup?  It goes on:

Thanks to a New York Times article published Wednesday night, we now know that the nation’s top intelligence officials briefed Trump in detail about the Russian meddling on Jan. 6, 2017 — two weeks before his inauguration. According to the Times, the officials shared with Trump powerful evidence that the interference, meant to boost Trump’s chances of winning, was ordered by Putin himself.

So we know that when Trump casts doubt on Russia’s culpability, he’s not speaking from a position of ignorance. It’s not that intelligence officials have asked him to take their conclusion on faith. They’ve shown him the goods. He’s just lying.

Who were the anonymous sources for the Times story? I have no idea. But if I had spent a career fighting for my country in the secrets world, and I heard my president give more credence to the former KGB officer who rules an undemocratic Russia than to his own intelligence chief, I would be angry.

Seriously dude.  Why in the flying FUCK would President Trump trust any of this intel, once again from anonymous sources no less.  It’s ALWAYS anonymous sources.  It’s been proven that people working on the Mueller team loathed President Trump and actively tried to derail his presidency.  Is this guy really this blind, or just shilling hard for his globalist masters?  Something tells me he wasn’t writing opinion pieces when Obama, or Hillary, or Schumer, or Bush was meeting with Putin.

The mainstream media is just as complicit as any deep state officials in all of this.  They peddle their lies and propaganda to the masses in a fear mongering attempt to control the narrative.  Why they think we will believe them now after they’ve been found out is beyond me.  I think their hubris truly makes them blind to how discredited and not believable they are.  Or they just think we are that stupid and that we’ll forget everything they’ve done up to this point to try and tear the nation apart.  People are waking up.  And some of the comments in the comment section give me hope that normies are waking up in record numbers too.

WaPoComment.JPG

“Journalism”

Huffington Post, folks!  This is what qualifies for journalism these days.  Some hard hitting stuff here.  Whether entirely serious or retroactively pretending to be coy, this is crap.  Innuendo.  They know exactly what they’re doing.

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 7.00.06 AM

Do not let up on these people and these organizations.  Could you ever picture them postulating this “this or that might exist” about Obama?  Neither could I.  Intentionally dishonest and misleading is the name of the game for these swamp creatures.