The logical endpoint

Rebel Media did an interview recently worth watching.  The entire clip can be found here but there’s a small snippet below.  It is the logical endpoint to the immigration madness we’re seeing in the world today.  Diversity is not our strength.  It never has been and it never will be.  You think Muslims will seriously tolerate homosexuality when they become a majority?  You think they will continue to band with the left’s multicultural nonsense?

The majority of the globalist left are NPC naive sheep led by some seriously evil and duplicitous demons at the top.  This will not end in gumdrops and lollipops.  It will be brutally violent.  And the longer we string out this pipe dream and come up with stopgap solutions to delay the inevitable the worse it will be.  The band-aid needs to be ripped off.  This goes for immigration, finance, all of it.

Will Germany learn from history?

Germany is considering legislation that would essentially give Muslims separate liberties under the law.

The German government has withdrawn proposed legislation that would have banned immigrants in polygamous marriages from obtaining German citizenship. The proposed ban had been included in draft changes to Germany’s naturalization law, but was quietly removed from the final text, apparently in the interests of political correctness and multiculturalism.

Although German law clearly prohibits polygamy for German nationals, some have argued that the law is unclear as to whether the law applies to foreign nationals living in Germany. The interior ministers of Germany’s 16 states had unanimously called on the German government to clarify the issue by enshrining into law a blanket ban on German citizenship for polygamous migrants.

Critics say that the bill, as it currently stands, would not only create a legal backdoor for polygamous migrants to become German citizens, but would effectively legalize the practice for Muslim immigrants. The changes would, consequently, enshrine into German law two parallel legal systems, one based on German Civil Law and another based on Islamic Sharia law.

The German government has long been debating proposed changes to the country’s Nationality Act (Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetz, StAG) that would strip German dual-citizens of their German citizenship if they join jihadi groups abroad. The proposed changes would not be retroactive and would not, for instance, apply to German jihadis who joined the Islamic State.

The original draft included language that would have prohibited immigrants in polygamous marriages, as well as immigrants who lack legal identification, from becoming German citizens. The language was removed from the bill after a Cabinet meeting in early April. The removal of the text, first reported by the newspaper Welt am Sonntag on May 5, has been greeted with outrage.

The parliamentary spokesman for the Christian Democrats, Mathias Middelberg, blamed Justice Minister Katarina Barley, of the Social Democrats, for removing the language. “This is completely incomprehensible and unacceptable,” said Middelberg. “It should be self-evident that naturalization of persons living in polygamous marriages is out of the question in the Basic Law.”

It is really too bad we hardly ever learn from the mistakes we made in the past.  Diversity + proximity = war.  If you let people in that do not share a common religion or ancestry, problems inevitably arise.

Take the Jews in Spain.  The Church was, let’s say, just a touch angry when they learned what the Talmud, which they only recently discovered, said about Jesus Christ.  Even so, they continued to push Sicut Judaeis non, making sure not to harm Jews, but also making sure they did not undermine or subvert society.  They preferred to try conversion instead of violent reprisal.  It took with some, but others abused it by converting to enjoy benefits, like the ability to take public office and move up, while not actually practicing Christianity.  The consequences of reverting back to their old ways became somewhat watered down due to the controversy between voluntary and forced conversion.  Here’s what E. Michael Jones had to say about the situation at this point in his excellent The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History.

After victory at Toro in 1476 over the party of “L’a Beltraneja,” Henry’s putative daughter whom the Portuguese backed as claimant to the throne, the Cortes of Madrigal restored royal prerogatives.  Jews were even more beyond the law than the renegade nobles.  They were tried in their own courts.  They could be prosecuted in royal courts only for criminal offenses, but they could only be punished in accord with their own law.  They could not be summoned to court on the Sabbath.  Even polygamy was tolerated among the Jews, and so they became an ongoing incitement for contempt of the law and of the Christian faith.  The conversos quickly exploited the situation.  The Cura de los Palacios claimed the practice of Judaism was widespread among the conversos.  Lea claims that when the royal couple took the throne, the Judaizers were so powerful that “the clerks were on the point of preaching the law of Moses.”  In addition, the judaizing conversos “avoided baptizing their children, and, when they could not prevent it they washed off the baptism on returning from the church; they ate meat on fast days and unleavened bread at Passover.”  They also continued to benefit from usury, claiming “they were despoiling the Egyptians.”  As a result, they became wealthy and powerful enough to block the enforcement of the laws that would have restored order.  Anarchy thwarted the attempt to impose order.

Separate laws for separate people in the same country breeds contempt and derision.  Eventually it will boil over.  In Spain’s case, the situation became so tenuous the Jews were kicked out, a recurring theme, having happened over 100 times throughout history.  Again from E. Michael Jones:

The Inquisition and the expulsion undid the work of St. Vincent Ferrer.  Jews were convinced conversion was or would be a mistake.  After the Edict of Expulsion was announced, the clergy launched a conversion campaign, but the incentives were gone.  There were few conversions, and most Jews left.  Most went to Portugal, from whence they were expelled a few years later.  Many went to Turkey, which received them with open arms.  It was out of the Ladino community in Ismir that the false messiah Shabbetai Zevi would arise 150 years later, buoyed by the writings of the Lurianic Cabala, whose school had been established in Gaza as a result of the expulsion.

On July 31, 1492, the last Jew left Spain.  In 1494, Alexander VI granted Ferdinand and Isabella the title of Catholic Kings, listing the expulsion of the Jews as one of their accomplishments.  Gian Pico della Mirandola praised them for it too.  Guicciardini, the Florentine historian and statesman, praised them as well.  The expulsion of the Jews along with the defeat of the Moors had united Spain and “raised it to the rank of a great power.”  Guicciardini concluded “had the situation not been corrected, Spain would in a few years have forsaken the Catholic religion.”

Time will tell what Germany decides to do.  Spain became a super power after the expulsion.  Will Germany take the same course?  Or will they continue to allow the globalists to run their country into the ground?

Senegal man hijacks school bus, set it on fire with 51 kids inside, to protest migrant deaths

Sadly, it will probably take more events like this before Europe and the United States get serious about sending them all back.  Italy is probably the first country that will do it right.  Via Daily Mail:

A Senegalese man abducted 51 children when he hijacked an Italian school bus and set the vehicle alight in a protest over migrant deaths in the Mediterranean.

Ousseynou Sy, originally Senegalese but with Italian citizenship, stopped the bus he was driving, with two classes of high school students on board.

He was said to have ordered the children’s hands to be bound and threatened to kill them and himself during the drive, before setting the vehicle on fire when he was stopped by a police blockade today.

Officers broke the glass in the back door of the bus and got all the passengers to safety without serious injury before the flames destroyed the vehicle, authorities said.

As he was apprehended, the driver said he was protesting migrant deaths in the Mediterranean, Commander Luca De Marchis told Sky TG24.

These immigrants aren’t even grateful for the countries that have let them in, yet we are told we need to let MORE in.  This guy became an Italian citizen in 2004, 15 years ago, and I think we can all agree does not appear to be any more “Italian” than the day he got there.  What with setting a school bus with 51 Italian children on board.  Or how about the time he got arrested for molesting a minor?  I’m failing to see the cultural enrichment Italy is receiving by opening their doors here.

Rare is the case where immigrants come here and completely assimilate.  Those who come here illegally or via refugee status are much harder from an assimilation standpoint.  The sooner people realize that they will not assimilate, do not want to assimilate, and have no intention to assimilate, the quicker we can begin the process of sending them all back from whence they came.

 

Philadelphia mosque under investigation for child brides

Via 6 ABC:

PHILADELPHIA (WPVI) — Police are now investigating whether child weddings are being conducted at a Philadelphia mosque after a sexual assault victim comes forward to Action News.

In a Facebook video posted two weeks ago, one of the alleged victims describes her ordeal. She’s 17 now but says she first became a child bride at 14.

“At the time I was a virgin. It was going to be my first marriage of course,” said the teen.

She says it didn’t last. And in 2016, she says she was married off to Rajmann Sanders, a man more than twice her age who then allegedly began sexually assaulting her and her 10-year-old sister.

“The 10-year-old was not handled correctly and everything was swept under the rug. Not only was it wrong, it was wrong to me because at the time I was still his wife,” she said.

Sanders is charged with more than a dozen sexual offenses against the girls, including rape, indecent assault, and forcible compulsion. The criminal complaint reveals Sanders threatened to shoot the older victim during one sexual assault.

Police are now investigating whether child weddings are being conducted at the Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo mosque on the 4800 block of Paschall.

One of the victims says her unofficial marriage took place there.

Last Friday, police conducted search warrants at the mosque and the home of a mosque leader.

The alleged victim says she’s coming forward to warn others.

“This is not healthy for me or my kids. No one should want their kids around this, especially with the pedophilia, that should be enough to say no I don’t want my kids around this,” she said.

You didn’t think they’d stop marrying kids just because they were “American” now, did you?  Invite the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.  Christian, western societal values simply do not mix with Islam.  They cannot co-exist in the same society for very long.  We have to make a choice.  Do we want to have a country that upholds the Western, Christian values this country was founded on?  Or are you willing to accept every cultural norm from every 3rd world country we continue to import people from?  Are you okay with child brides?  Pedophilia?  Treating women as 2nd class citizens?  Because you can’t have both.  Either you submit to multiculturalism or we fight for our way of life, and stop importing people with a fundamentally incompatible worldview with our own.

#priorities

San Francisco is withholding surveillance videos of crime to avoid stereotypes.

SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX) — In the last three months, there have been at least three robberies on BART involving groups of teenagers.

“I think people are genuinely concerned — they are fearful about the stories that have come out about the recent attacks, the assaults, the thefts,” said Debora Allen, who is a member of the BART Board of Directors.

April 22: Forty to sixty kids boarded a train at the Coliseum stop and robbed seven passengers, beating up two;

June 28: A group of four kids assaulted a passenger and made off with a cell phone at Dublin; and

June 30: A woman on a train with about a dozen teenagers had her phone snatched by one them before the group got off at the Coliseum stop. Thankfully, a good Samaritan was on hand to retrieve the phone.

So far, BART has refused to turn over surveillance video for any of these incidents.

llen told us the agency issued an explanation for why it is being tight-lipped about the thefts.

“To release these videos would create a high level of racially insensitive commentary toward the district,” she was told. “And in addition it would create a racial bias in the riders against minorities on the trains.”

According to a memo distributed to BART Directors, the agency won’t do a press release on the June 30 theft because it was a “petty crime” that would make BART look “crime ridden.” Furthermore, it would “unfairly affect and characterize riders of color, leading to sweeping generalizations in media reports.”

The memo was from BART Assistant General Manager Kerry Hamill.

Allen emailed Hamill, “I don’t understand what role the color of one’s skin plays in this issue [of whether to divulge information]. Can you explain?”

Hamill responded, “If we were to regularly feed the news media video of crimes on our system that involve minority suspects, particularly when they are minors, we would certainly face questions as to why we were sensationalizing relatively minor crimes and perpetuating false stereotypes in the process.” And added her opinion of the media: “My view is that the media’s real interest in the videos of youth phone snatching incidents isn’t the desire for transparency but rather the pursuit of ratings. They know that video of these events will drive clicks to their websites and viewers to their programs because people are motivated by fear.”

Allen says scared passengers aren’t being unreasonable — being on a BART train is a vulnerable position.

“This is BART, people are sort of trapped in this train for awhile and they have a right to see what could potentially happen.”

She says all this raises questions, “What is the priority of BART? Is the safety of the passenger — of all passengers — is that a lesser priority than the race bias issue?”

This is a microcosm of one of western civilizations many problems.  We would rather commit societal suicide than potentially offend <insert minority group here>.  Isn’t that telling anyways, if every single crime is committed by the same group of people every single time?  Don’t we have a right to know that?  Of course they don’t think so.  That would ruin the narrative they’re trying to push that diversity is our strength and multiculturalism is amazing.  If people really knew the truth they would not be as open and willing.  They’re literally prioritizing the feelings of criminals over the safety of the general public.  Let that sink in.

And by the way, stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason.  They often times provide a useful heuristic.  And it would be cool if we held everyone in our society to the same standard, no?

Reparations? Here’s an idea.

The 2020 Democratic primaries are going to be a circus.  A contest, to see who can virtue signal the most.  One of the more ridiculous ideas going around right now are reparations for slavery.  Because nothing says making things equal like taking money from people who had nothing to do with slavery to give to people who were not slaves.

When Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was asked whether he endorsed reparations for the descendants of slaves in the U.S. during a CNN town hall earlier this week, he responded with another question: “What does that mean?”

The Democratic presidential hopeful wasn’t soliciting moderator Wolf Blitzer for a quick dictionary break—although the Associated Press notes that the Democratic candidates have been trying to “embrace a new meaning” of the word.

“I’m not sure anyone’s very clear,” Sanders, who didn’t support reparationsduring his unsuccessful 2016 presidential bid, continued.

While several other 2020 Democratic hopefuls, including Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris, have recently voiced support slavery reparations, what form those reparations would take is unclear.

Should reparations involve the literal payment of damages to the families of slaves? Or should those reparations be made, not through direct monetary compensation, but through policies that benefit black Americans to close opportunity gaps?

Maybe there is something to this, and maybe it can be fixed.  Make no mistake, it is an absurd idea to even broach the topic of reparations in any serious fashion.  Of course we shouldn’t have to pay a dime.  Only 5% of Americans ever owned slaves at its peak (here’s a normie source to confirm).  Nevertheless, slavery was the worst idea in American history, and in many ways has contributed to the downfall of America.  So when I say fixed, it has to be something that is reasonable, where both sides may come to an understanding, but also should benefit America given that nobody today has any obligation to pay anything to anyone with regards to reparations.

So here is an idea.  The whole Liberia thing didn’t really work out, and it wouldn’t be fair to just offer African-Americans a free one-way ticket back to Africa given that they never grew up there and it is not their home.  What if we gave them a country of their own, taken right from the land here in America?  Say, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama?  And what if we paid every African-American that went $100,000 to go and start a life there?  Might that be tempting and fair enough?

2000px-Map_of_USA_with_state_names.svg

The estimated population in 2019 is ~330 million people, with roughly 13% of the population being African-American.  This would come out to roughly $4.3 trillion dollars.  If they really, truly, wanted reparations, this would be a great way to go.  They would not be able to argue anymore, given a large sum of money and land of their own.  As laid out in the Forbes article linked above, candidates like Marianne Williamson will never be happy with “race-conscious policies” no matter how favorable they are to African-Americans.  It will only continue to sow derision and contempt amongst the US population.  This way, with more money and a land of their own, they can run things however they want to run them, and only have themselves to blame if it all goes to shit.

Of course, this is a rough idea and a lot would need to be ironed out.  Surely many citizens in the areas being appropriated would want to leave, and would also require compensation to either stay or move back to another state.  So let’s round out the above estimate to $6 trillion.

So how would we pay for this?  Well, here’s a proposal for that as well.  Eliminate welfare.  Let it be known the links I post to this are all from normie sources so as not to think I am cherry-picking stats that would boost my case.  I’ll go back to Newsweek for this one that states that 2.8 million blacks were “lifted above the poverty line” by these programs, or over 20% of the entire black population.  25% of African-Americans were also on the SNAP program (food stamps).  These are probably the most conservative estimates that any mainstream news source would cite.  Of course they spin them a different way, in raw numbers rather than by percentage to say that more whites are on the program than blacks.  So yes, by the same article there were 6.2 million whites on welfare…out of just over 197 million non-Hispanic whites, which comes out to just over 3%.  Spin the elimination of welfare however you want.  Say that it is the only way to make this happen and right the wrong done to African-Americans or something like that.  If you search the internet many estimates say we spend $1 trillion A YEAR on welfare.  The Washington Post says that is BS…but it is the WaPo…and I can’t see what their estimate actually is because of their paywall.  Let’s go conservative again and say it’s half of that.  You could have the entire thing paid for in less than 20 years.

Put that way, it doesn’t seem like such a bad deal, does it?  We can give African-Americans a new start, with the ball in their court, to make a life for themselves however they want.  It may help erase the stain of slavery and what it did to this country.  And maybe it will even alleviate the (wildly misplaced) white Christian guilt so many have.

The effects are obviously so much larger than that though.  Multi-racial tension is tearing America apart.  This would be a solution that truly has a chance of fixing the country in a non-violent fashion.  As things currently stand civil war is nearly inevitable.  The racial tensions will only continue to rise.  This should certainly alleviate that and also give African-Americans mentally a chance to feel like they finally hold their own destiny in their own hands.  Or at the very least, we will have removed any and all remaining excuses that they can use.

And by the way, this same approach could probably work for Hispanics as well.  When they inevitably demand something similar, though far less deserving than even the undeserved demands made by some of these Democratic hopefuls, let’s do something similar.  Hispanics are taking over the Southwestern part of the country already.  Let’s give Southern California and New Mexico to Mexico and build a gigantic 80 foot wall (50 feet above ground, 30 feet below) to cordon off the Southwest after that.  Given their desire to maintain their Mexican, or central, or south American heritages, the nice weather and being amongst their own people should be enough incentive for many if not a majority of Hispanics to move out of the rest of the country to this new land.  Would anyone really miss the den of vipers that is Los Angeles at this point anyways?

600 students pulled from school over LGBT agenda

Telling story that came out of Birminghan, UK recently:

Furious Muslim parents reportedly withdrew 600 children from Parkfield Community School today after claiming they were being ‘brainwashed’ over gay lifestyles.

The pupils were taken out of classes as the row surrounding LGBT lifestyles being taught openly in the classroom escalated.

Some reports suggest as many as 80 per cent of the children at Parkfield Community Schoolin Saltley have been removed – around 600.

Kids have been withdrawn over the school’s “undermining of parental rights and aggressively promoting homosexuality”, according to Alum Rock Community Forum.

The forum adds: “Dialogue, petitioning and protests by parents have been repeated and arrogantly ignored.

“Our children, Our Choice – Work with parents not against them.”

Repeat the mantra: DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH!

Something that only about half the population apparently realizes is that these rows will only get worse as we continue to promote and allow in people and cultures that fundamentally do not mix well together and will not live peacefully near each other.  As in England, you are already seeing in the United States the friction Muslims are having with Jews, the LGBTQSHDKSFHERUS community, and others.  This is not rocket science, nor is it surprising.  As a side note, if the above numbers are true and as many as 80% of the children have been removed, and we are to assume that they are Muslim, that tells you the state of England at the moment to even be able to have a school that is 80% Muslim in BRITAIN.

The multicultural dream is dead.  It always was an impossibility.  You know where you don’t have these kinds of problems?  Or problems of racism?  Largely homogeneous communities, where the majority of people share a common language, a common ancestry, a common religion, and a common culture and traditions.  That is a hard truth for many to swallow.  For many that mean well, and try and see the best in people and hope for the best.  These people are often used by higher-ups with far more sinister purposes, who know how this kind of multicultural mixing inevitably destroys states.  And it doesn’t make one racist to want to return to a nationalist mindset with countries comprising of largely homogeneous populations; by far the most stable scenario.  A country with 90+% of a nation of people, a nation by its strict definition, is ideal.  10% or less of minority groups is probably sustainable in this kind of environment.

Sadly, America is probably too far gone to ever return to that level of stability or demographic makeup.  On some level, accelerating the inevitable collapse may be less painful and bloody in the long run than letting this run its course.  America will split up into several different countries in the long run.  The country will largely be divided along racial lines.  One scenario is probably something like most whites moving to the midwest or maybe midwest/northeast, Hispanics largely (they already have) taking over the west and southwest, if not most of the south if you look at what’s happening in Florida too.  We shall see what happens.  Pray for the best, but prepare for the worst.

%d bloggers like this: